ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › 1. e4 e5 - Non-Spanish › Kings Gambit › C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit
 Pages: [1]
 C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit (Read 98426 times)
 buddho Junior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 72 Joined: 04/21/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #151 - 03/11/17 at 12:27:00 after 10.Qf2 Qxf2+ 11.Kxf2 Ne7! 12.Nb5 Kd8 13.Bxf4 a6 14.Nc3 Nbc6 15.Rd1 white seems to have full compensation for the pawn. IP Logged
 brabo God Member Offline Welcome chessfriend Posts: 771 Joined: 02/02/07 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #150 - 03/11/17 at 12:11:01 buddho wrote on 03/11/17 at 12:00:50:Hi Brabo, yes that's the solution - great!Without deep analysis of this line the engines are initially deterred by 10.Qf2 g3, which turns out to be great for white after 11.Qxf4.Many thanks. After 10.Qf2 g3 11.Qxf4 g2+ 12.Qxh4 gxh1(Q) black is a rook up but the engine coolly plays 13.Kf2 and doesn't see any rescue anymore for blacks second queen. The Kingsgambit is definitely not boring. I doubt very much that I would see all this in advance when playing unprepared a standard game. IP Logged
 buddho Junior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 72 Joined: 04/21/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #149 - 03/11/17 at 12:00:50 Hi Brabo, yes that's the solution - great!Without deep analysis of this line the engines are initially deterred by 10.Qf2 g3, which turns out to be great for white after 11.Qxf4.Many thanks. IP Logged
 brabo God Member Offline Welcome chessfriend Posts: 771 Joined: 02/02/07 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #148 - 03/11/17 at 10:20:54 This analysis has of course nothing anymore to do with OTB chess as I expect chance is close to 0% such lines can occur in normal practice. IP Logged
 mn Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 126 Location: Ottawa Joined: 09/22/16 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #147 - 03/10/17 at 16:21:38 I think 8 Nf5 can be nicely met by 8...Bxf5 9 exf5 Nc6, when 10 Bb5 is neutralized by 10...Kf8! - Black's King seems pretty safe here, and I don't think White's manages to make it to the Queenside. e.g. upon regaining the pawn with 11 Bxc6 (11 Qxg4 Nxd4) 11...bxc6 12 Qxg4, there is 12...h5 13 Qf3 and now the annoying sequence 13...fxg3 14 hxg3 Bxc1 15 Rxc1 Qg5!, when it looks like Black has a clear advantage either in the ending (after 16 Qf4 Qxf4 17 exf4) or the middlegame, where White's King looks to be in danger. IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #146 - 03/10/17 at 08:09:38 buddho wrote on 03/09/17 at 17:02:53:I have come across a problem for white that I cannot solve. After 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.d4 g5 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 Bh6! the best I can do for white is 7.Nc3 Bg5 8.Ng2 f3 9.Nf4 h5 10.h4 Bf6 11.Be3 c6 12.Qd2 Bg7 13.O-O-O Ne7 =+Any improvements for white? Did you look at 8 Nf5 - ? blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 buddho Junior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 72 Joined: 04/21/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #145 - 03/09/17 at 17:02:53 I have come across a problem for white that I cannot solve. After 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.d4 g5 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 Bh6! the best I can do for white is 7.Nc3 Bg5 8.Ng2 f3 9.Nf4 h5 10.h4 Bf6 11.Be3 c6 12.Qd2 Bg7 13.O-O-O Ne7 =+Any improvements for white? IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #144 - 02/11/17 at 20:15:16 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/19/14 at 11:39:42:Your analysis in The Fascinating King's Gambit still holds in my opinion. But instead of 11.Ng3?, White should play 11.Qd2! intending 11...0-0 12.Qg5. When the queens are exchanged, there is not the slightest reason why Black's fewer pawn islands should be a factor. White's center may well be more important. A refutation of the King's Bishop Gambit this Black line is certainly not. And I've now just blogged about that:http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/012-bust-to-bishops-gambit.html blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #143 - 07/13/15 at 15:24:11 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/19/14 at 11:39:42:Your analysis in The Fascinating King's Gambit still holds in my opinion. But instead of 11.Ng3?, White should play 11.Qd2! intending 11...0-0 12.Qg5. When the queens are exchanged, there is not the slightest reason why Black's fewer pawn islands should be a factor. White's center may well be more important. A refutation of the King's Bishop Gambit this Black line is certainly not. regarding which... blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #142 - 07/07/15 at 05:58:50 Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/06/15 at 15:09:47:Jon, I'm not hugely familiar with the theory here. Did either of these two games challenge Shaw's analysis? More that they added to it a bit, and they were my first games with the Quaade (tsmenace is my handle), so I thought I'd share them. The first one refers to Shaw page 169; the second to Shaw page 140 – 5...Nc6! etc is his line, and it's pretty equal. blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 Smyslov_Fan YaBB ModeratorCorrespondence fan Offline Progress depends on the unreasonable man. ~GBS Posts: 6900 Joined: 06/16/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #141 - 07/06/15 at 15:09:47 Jon, I'm not hugely familiar with the theory here. Did either of these two games challenge Shaw's analysis? IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #140 - 07/02/15 at 14:33:56 two new Quaade games:(when I figure out how to use the PGN function) « Last Edit: 07/07/15 at 10:33:52 by GMTonyKosten » blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 Knightcut YaBB Newbies Offline Unclear chess rocks! Posts: 27 Location: Denmark Joined: 04/04/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #139 - 11/25/14 at 22:04:32 TalJechin wrote on 04/19/14 at 14:49:15:I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? Black has the bishop pair, a slight space advantage and better development, plus that White is left with the wrong bishop and pawns on c3+d4, which makes the light squares a potential long term weakness.White has an extra centre pawn and potential counter-chances vs Black's king. So, consolidating the king with 12...Kg6 should have a higher priority than trying to strike back with 12...c5. I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. An interesting alternative to investigate earlier on might be 8...a6!?, which is ignored by Shaw, but seems to be favoured by Stockfish. The first point is that 9.d5 is met by 9...Bg4! and now if 10.dxc6?!, then b5! favours Black. If instead 10.Na3! b5! 11.Nxb5 axb5 12.Qxb5 Nge7 13.dxc6 Black ends up temporarily a pawn down, but with good compensation in terms of better placed pieces, open lines and - possibly soon to come - increased pressure on whites queen side pawns. IP Logged
 Knightcut YaBB Newbies Offline Unclear chess rocks! Posts: 27 Location: Denmark Joined: 04/04/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #138 - 11/02/14 at 08:19:59 Ametanoitos wrote on 10/01/14 at 10:40:41:Just a joke. You guys have comminted a crime not quoting Gustaffson who was the first one who proposed this ...Kg6 novelty! 12...Kg6 is also given by Shaw (although he arrives at the position after 10...Kf8 instead of 10...Ke7, but after 11.Kxf7 that doesn´t change anything). He credits Gustafsson for the suggestion and states that it looks good after 13.Nbd2 Ne7, or 13.g3 fxg3 14.hxg3 c5!? IP Logged
 Ametanoitos God Member Offline The road to success is under construction Posts: 1419 Location: Patras Joined: 01/04/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #137 - 10/02/14 at 02:07:33 I can guarantee that the rumours are true! I was going through these lines here and suddenly when i hit upon ...Kg6 i had a memory flash and i was sure that i had seen this before somewhere.... So, i said to myself "let me check Gusti..." and i was right! « Last Edit: 10/02/14 at 18:21:23 by Ametanoitos » IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #136 - 10/01/14 at 14:51:58 Ametanoitos wrote on 10/01/14 at 10:40:41:Just a joke. You guys have comminted a crime not quoting Gustaffson who was the first one who proposed this ...Kg6 novelty! Apologies to Jan Gustafsson. I prefer books over videos, but rumours have it that Gustafsson's videos are worth the trouble. Besides, see reply #19 of this thread: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/chess/YaBB.pl?num=1292872423/all IP Logged
 Ametanoitos God Member Offline The road to success is under construction Posts: 1419 Location: Patras Joined: 01/04/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #135 - 10/01/14 at 10:40:41 Stefan Buecker wrote on 04/23/14 at 10:22:53:TalJechin wrote on 04/19/14 at 14:49:15:I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? [...]I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. 12...Kg6 indeed may be a good idea. But I am not sure whether it is stronger than, say, 8...Kf8, which also parries the direct threats, postponing the decision how to disrupt White's center to the future. In these and similar lines in the Hanstein Gambit, I find it difficult to come to final conclusions. The analysis never ends in move 15 or 17, it's closer to 30 or so. Engines dislike the Hanstein, they fail to see the [OTB] merits of a pawn center. My 1986 book Das neue Königsgambit recommended the Hanstein/Muzio, as it appeared sound enough for my OTB play. Would I still recommend it, if I were in John Shaw's place and had a readership of PC owners, some of whom even play correspondence chess, or visit the truth-obsessed chesspub site? Hard to say. As I see it, the fans of 3.Nf3 should regard the Kieseritzky Gambit as their first choice, while 3.Bc4 players can follow your main line. For both groups the Hanstein remains worth a look, as a fallback option, maybe to surprise an opponent. There is 8.Qa4, and there are other lines which are relatively unexplored. - John Shaw hasn't really studied the Hanstein, but still he claimed to have refuted 3.Bc4. This gap will hopefully be filled in the 2nd edition. Then would be a better moment to take a closer look at the Hanstein. Just a joke. You guys have comminted a crime not quoting Gustaffson who was the first one who proposed this ...Kg6 novelty! IP Logged
 brabo God Member Offline Welcome chessfriend Posts: 771 Joined: 02/02/07 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #134 - 08/14/14 at 06:47:29 This time an in-depth overview/ analysis of the Nf3 line and more particular the complex of Fischer's defense/Becker's defense/Quaade gambit: http://chess-brabo.blogspot.be/2014/08/kings-gambit-with-nf3.html IP Logged
 brabo God Member Offline Welcome chessfriend Posts: 771 Joined: 02/02/07 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #133 - 08/08/14 at 12:43:59 A new blogarticle covering some points which were discussed in this thread on chesspub but also some new material on the Bc4 line: http://chess-brabo.blogspot.be/2014/08/kings-gambit-with-bc4.html IP Logged
 Master Om Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 185 Joined: 02/20/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #131 - 07/05/14 at 05:33:53 TalJechin wrote on 04/19/14 at 14:49:15:I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? Black has the bishop pair, a slight space advantage and better development, plus that White is left with the wrong bishop and pawns on c3+d4, which makes the light squares a potential long term weakness.White has an extra centre pawn and potential counter-chances vs Black's king. So, consolidating the king with 12...Kg6 should have a higher priority than trying to strike back with 12...c5. I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. That is what I am analysing ATM. There are only 3 good alternatives for black. Kg6, Ne7 and c5. Will post the results soon. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #130 - 04/29/14 at 07:27:33 Stefan Buecker wrote on 04/19/14 at 12:34:17:Disagreement about the "N" sign remains. I have proposed to use another sign instead: DB which would be defined as "a move not in our database". Alternatively, QC and other chess publishers could drop the capital "N" and use the sign "n" instead, defining it as "n" = the same as the traditional N for "novelty", but research limited to databases. The "n" would indicate that the author is focused on analysis, not [historical] research. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #129 - 04/23/14 at 12:12:43 Stefan Buecker wrote on 04/23/14 at 10:22:53:TalJechin wrote on 04/19/14 at 14:49:15:I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? [...]I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. 12...Kg6 indeed may be a good idea. But I am not sure whether it is stronger than, say, 8...Kf8, which also parries the direct threats, postponing the decision how to disrupt White's center to the future. In these and similar lines in the Hanstein Gambit, I find it difficult to come to final conclusions. The analysis never ends in move 15 or 17, it's closer to 30 or so. Engines dislike the Hanstein, they fail to see the [OTB] merits of a pawn center. My 1986 book Das neue Königsgambit recommended the Hanstein/Muzio, as it appeared sound enough for my OTB play. Would I still recommend it, if I were in John Shaw's place and had a readership of PC owners, some of whom even play correspondence chess, or visit the truth-obsessed chesspub site? Hard to say. As I see it, the fans of 3.Nf3 should regard the Kieseritzky Gambit as their first choice, while 3.Bc4 players can follow your main line. For both groups the Hanstein remains worth a look, as a fallback option, maybe to surprise an opponent. There is 8.Qa4, and there are other lines which are relatively unexplored. - John Shaw hasn't really studied the Hanstein, but still he claimed to have refuted 3.Bc4. This gap will hopefully be filled in the 2nd edition. Then would be a better moment to take a closer look at the Hanstein. Sure we can postpone the dissecting of the Hanstein (I'm not sure I'll have the time at the moment anyway). I wouldn't be surprised if there's something promising among the unexplored set-ups. But 8.Qa4 I simply don't believe in, even if one probably can get away with it OTB. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #128 - 04/23/14 at 10:22:53 TalJechin wrote on 04/19/14 at 14:49:15:I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? [...]I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. 12...Kg6 indeed may be a good idea. But I am not sure whether it is stronger than, say, 8...Kf8, which also parries the direct threats, postponing the decision how to disrupt White's center to the future. In these and similar lines in the Hanstein Gambit, I find it difficult to come to final conclusions. The analysis never ends in move 15 or 17, it's closer to 30 or so. Engines dislike the Hanstein, they fail to see the [OTB] merits of a pawn center. My 1986 book Das neue Königsgambit recommended the Hanstein/Muzio, as it appeared sound enough for my OTB play. Would I still recommend it, if I were in John Shaw's place and had a readership of PC owners, some of whom even play correspondence chess, or visit the truth-obsessed chesspub site? Hard to say. As I see it, the fans of 3.Nf3 should regard the Kieseritzky Gambit as their first choice, while 3.Bc4 players can follow your main line. For both groups the Hanstein remains worth a look, as a fallback option, maybe to surprise an opponent. There is 8.Qa4, and there are other lines which are relatively unexplored. - John Shaw hasn't really studied the Hanstein, but still he claimed to have refuted 3.Bc4. This gap will hopefully be filled in the 2nd edition. Then would be a better moment to take a closer look at the Hanstein. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #127 - 04/19/14 at 14:49:15 I had a brief look at "1.  e4 e5 2.  f4 exf4 3.  Nf3 g5 4.  Bc4 Nc6 5.  O-O d6 6.  d4 h6 7.  c3 Bg7 8.  Qa4 Bd7 9.  Qb3 Na5 10.  Bxf7 Ke7 11.  Qa3 Kxf7 12.  Qxa5"and one idea that popped up is 12...Kg6!? Black has the bishop pair, a slight space advantage and better development, plus that White is left with the wrong bishop and pawns on c3+d4, which makes the light squares a potential long term weakness.White has an extra centre pawn and potential counter-chances vs Black's king. So, consolidating the king with 12...Kg6 should have a higher priority than trying to strike back with 12...c5. I don't remember if we've discussed Kg6, but if it hasn't been mentioned before you could start a new thread for it, if you're interested?Edit: After a closer look, I think 12...Kg6! is at least an edge for Black.The good news is that Shaw's strange line vs my mainline is still okay for White. I prefer the Bd3-idea, but your Qd2-g5 also looks okay, though I'd prefer to have the queens on the board. « Last Edit: 04/20/14 at 10:00:02 by TalJechin » IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #126 - 04/19/14 at 13:09:07 Not Caissiber Chess? The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #125 - 04/19/14 at 12:34:17 Just a short note. In the meantime I have exchanged e-mails with John Shaw, and we have settled our quarrel - at least the personal part of it, regarding the Kaissiber articles and the way they were credited in The King's Gambit. Disagreement about the "N" sign remains. I have proposed to use another sign instead: DB which would be defined as "a move not in our database". At the end of the day it is the decision of Quality Chess how they want to handle the history of an opening and the research. Birders have rarity commissions for the occasional sightings of rare birds. In chess, a novelty commission might decide about the status of a published idea: new or not. Members of this commission could be the three big publishing houses: Quality Chess, Quantity Chess and Quasimodo Chess. Oh, wait... IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #123 - 02/26/14 at 08:58:44 RdC wrote on 02/25/14 at 22:31:51:Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/25/14 at 17:28:38:1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Bxf4?! There's an Alekhine game from 1903 which went1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nc6 4. d4 Nf6 5. e5 Ne4 6. Bxf4 Qh4+ 7. g3 Nxg3 8. Bxg3 Qe4+ 9. Kf2 Qxh1. which is the available combination, if not quite the same position. IIrc, I more or less refuted that line in the FKG, so Black's 5...d5 is essential. IP Logged
GMTonyKosten

Offline

Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 2893
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender:
Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit
Reply #122 - 02/25/14 at 23:31:54
Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/25/14 at 17:28:38:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Bxf4?!

John Shaw in King's Gambit p.441:

Quote:
7...Qh4+!N
7...Be7 Tiller - Kennaugh, Sunningdale 2007.

So did Shaw improve over a game from 2007? No, as we have just seen (quoted above the diagram), he could have found the Queen move in Johansson's work. Henk Smout has found the following comment from Hans Kmoch on 7...Qh4+ in Nachtrag zu P.R. v. Bilguer (v.d. Lasa) Handbuch des Schachspiels für die Jahre 1916-1929, Berlin & Leipzig 1930, p. 59, footnote 16:

Quote:
Damit wird sowohl 6. Lb3 als auch 6. Lb5 widerlegt. Diese Möglichkeit wurde von J. Bubnow, Koslow, Sowjetrußland entdeckt.

Even when I played 7...Qh4+ against Koch in the French Team Championships 2012 I knew that it was the known refutation of White's setup and had been played before, and yet I am far from an expert on the King's Gambit.
Incidentally, the real 'N' only came on move 17!

IP Logged

 RdC God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 679 Joined: 05/17/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #121 - 02/25/14 at 22:31:51 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/25/14 at 17:28:38:1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Bxf4?! There's an Alekhine game from 1903 which went1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nc6 4. d4 Nf6 5. e5 Ne4 6. Bxf4 Qh4+ 7. g3 Nxg3 8. Bxg3 Qe4+ 9. Kf2 Qxh1. which is the available combination, if not quite the same position. IP Logged
 fling God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1468 Joined: 01/21/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #120 - 02/25/14 at 21:51:05 I kinda agree with Eric's comment, but I also seem to remember John Shaw being one of the editors at QC, or am I wrong? IP Logged
 ErictheRed God Member Offline USCF National Master Posts: 2184 Location: USA Joined: 10/02/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #119 - 02/25/14 at 19:21:14 You know, I understand a lot of the criticism in this and the other thread, but it would be nice to hear the other side of the story.  Perhaps the publisher and/or author should be contacted?  Perhaps the author didn't write the 'Ns', but an editor added them later, and we're criticizing the wrong people.I do think that some very good points have been raised, but at this point people are just making a stink on the Chesspub forums (so it seems to me), which isn't going to get anywhere.  A polite email or phone calls to Quality Chess, Aagaard, John Shaw, etc., might be in order, instead of airing everything in a public forum before the accused parties have had a chance to respond.  Just a suggestion. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #118 - 02/25/14 at 18:00:58 Hmm, so he puts "N" after every move his engine likes?!  N as in engiNe? IP Logged
Stefan Buecker
God Member

Offline

Posts: 1343
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender:
Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit
Reply #117 - 02/25/14 at 17:28:38
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Bxf4?!

Shaw, p.440, end of right column: "Objectively White's best chance is 7.Nf3N but after 7...g5! White does not have enough for the pawn. Micawber gives the illustrative line 8.h4 Ng3 9.Rh2 g4 [...]" However, 7.Nf3 had already been given by Johansson in The Fascinating King's Gambit, 2004, p. 110:

Quote:
7.Nf3!?N (7.Bxf4? Qh4+ [...] Bernstein, A - Sergeev, Moscow 1928) 7...g5 8.0-0 [...]

Shaw doesn't give Johansson's analysis starting 8.0-0, maybe 8.h4 is indeed a better try. Shaw might have just quoted another source in his bibliography: NiC Yearbook 75, p. 149:  8.0-0 a6 9.Lxc6 bxc6 =+ (Niek Narings).

John Shaw in King's Gambit p.441:

Quote:
7...Qh4+!N
7...Be7 Tiller - Kennaugh, Sunningdale 2007.

So did Shaw improve over a game from 2007? No, as we have just seen (quoted above the diagram), he could have found the Queen move in Johansson's work. Henk Smout has found the following comment from Hans Kmoch on 7...Qh4+ in Nachtrag zu P.R. v. Bilguer (v.d. Lasa) Handbuch des Schachspiels für die Jahre 1916-1929, Berlin & Leipzig 1930, p. 59, footnote 16:

Quote:
Damit wird sowohl 6. Lb3 als auch 6. Lb5 widerlegt. Diese Möglichkeit wurde von J. Bubnow, Koslow, Sowjetrußland entdeckt.

IP Logged

 RdC God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 679 Joined: 05/17/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #116 - 02/22/14 at 21:28:35 This book recommends, I think, the idea of 3. .. Nc6 against the Kings Bishop Gambit of 3. Bc4. Presumably after 4. Nf3, you go back into normal territory with 4. .. g5. But staying in the King Bishop territory with 4. .. Nf6 also has to be possible, as in a County match game earlier today. After 5. Nc3, I'm not sure what Black's next move should be. In the event I punted 5. .. d5 and after 6 exd5, a Two Knights lookalike with 6. .. Na5. The subsequent play appears to be original. White made a temporary sacrifice with 7. 0-0, so Black chopped it off 7. .. Nxc4. Then 8. Qe2+ is met by a desperado 8. .. Ne3 to block the e file for a moment. White takes it 9. dxe3 and Black develops the Bishop with a pin 9. .. Bc5. White then plays the check 10. Qb5 which forces 10. .. Nd7. White unpinned with 11. Kh1, whereupon Black has to take on e3 with the Bishop. 11. .. Bxe3 12.Bxe3 fxe3 13. Rae1. Now finally 13. .. 0-0 14. Rxe3 Nf6. I though at the time this was slightly better for White on development and activity grounds. The game as a contest now ended abruptly as White blundered with 15. Ng5 which allows 15. .. Ng4 winning material. The clever-looking 16. Nxf7 doesn't work because of 16. .. Nxe3 17 Nxd8 Rxf1+ IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #115 - 02/21/14 at 08:17:36 Pale Horse, Pale Rider wrote on 02/20/14 at 22:44:47:So I guess the conclusion is that either the author/editor didn't know all this, or chose to ignore it. In both cases it's not exactly good advertisement for QC. I guess the number of novelties is marketing feature too tempting too resist. "Didn't know all this" seems unlikely, because several books that give 5.Qe2 are listed in the bibliography of King's Gambit. There are more examples like this one, a lot more. How many of those N signs are "true"? Hard to say. The N matter is complicated, some ideas in KG seem actually new, but don't have the N. Hans Ree has written an article in NIC Magazine 6 (2013) p. 102-105, about his own love to the King's Gambit, refering to Shaw's book, calling the work "impressive". Ree's piece is full of personal and historical musings about the gambit. It gives a hint how rich the history of this opening is. It is a pity that Quality Chess has chosen to focus on the N side of the opening, badly ignoring the O (for Oldie) aspect.  You have written "author/editor". It would indeed be interesting to know how much of the book is pure Shaw and how much editing there was by Jacob Aagaard. The phrase "technically, this is not a novelty" turns up in older books from Quality Chess, before the era Shaw. So I'd suspect that it comes from Aagaard. By the way, Aagaard has contributed one of his games plus a very detailed analysis on pp. 291-295 (excellent work, imo). But you can't be sure that this is his only contribution. There is occasional material in other QC books with the Aagaard sound. IP Logged
 Pale Horse, Pale Rider Senior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 287 Joined: 12/26/12 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #114 - 02/20/14 at 22:44:47 So I guess the conclusion is that either the author/editor didn't know all this, or chose to ignore it. In both cases it's not exactly good advertisement for QC. I guess the number of novelties is marketing feature too tempting too resist. IP Logged
 Stigma God Member Offline There is a crack in everything. Posts: 2544 Joined: 11/07/06 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #113 - 02/20/14 at 19:45:31 It seems Quality Chess is really stretching their use of the 'N' symbol in some cases. Disappointing, and a case of false marketing since they can then claim their books contain that many more novelties. Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #112 - 02/20/14 at 17:21:45 dfan wrote on 02/20/14 at 14:46:26:Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/20/14 at 14:15:13:But I can't claim that I fully understand the Chess Informant logic. Neither do I understand what the N stands for when John Shaw or Jacob Aagaard are using it. Quality Chess books contain sentences like "Technically this is not a novelty, but..." So it seems that there are cases when a move isn't new, but Quality Chess doesn't care and puts an N behind the move, because - well, I have no idea. When you know earlier sources which have given a move, why can't you just credit the earlier author? Wouldn't this be the honest thing to do? I'd have to see the particular instance to which you refer, but sometimes this language means that the move has been played by a (relatively) weak player who didn't follow it up correctly, so the move has been played before, but the idea behind it is new. I do think that it is stretching things to still call that move a novelty in that sort of case. Okay, so let me give you an example. Shaw: The King's Gambit, p. 427, right column: Quote:4...d6. This logical move has only been played in a couple of games, including Kulaots - Kiltti, Vantaa 1996. White's best reply looks to be: 5.Qe2!N Technically a novelty, although it has been considered by a few commentators. The move 5. Qe2 has been played before, and not by some patzers: Bronstein - Drozdov, Riga 1986. However, the move 5.Qe2 has a much older history. Let's see the tournament book Vienna 1903, p.65: So Carl Schlechter credits 5.Qe2 to Simon Alapin, giving the move two exclamation marks. It wouldn't be fair to say that the move has merely been "considered", as Shaw puts it. No, the move has been clearly recommended, no doubt about it, by Alapin and Carl Schlechter. This comment had also appeared in Deutsche Schachzeitung (since Carl Schlechter was editing the DSZ). The idea 5.Qe2 is also getting "!!" in Wiener Schachzeitung 1904, p. 236. Would you call this merely "considered"? In WSZ 1904, p. 84, there is more analysis of 5.Qe2 by Alapin. Who else did mention the move 5.Qe2? Rudolf Spielmann in the 8th edition of the Handbuch ("Bilguer"), Euwe, Keres, Korchnoi/Zak, older editions of ECO C, Estrin/Glazkov, Gallagher, Soltis, Raingruber/Maser, Bangiev, Johansson, Reinderman 2006, Kalinichenko. Many of these authors are putting an exclamation mark after 5.Qe2.Many thanks to Henk Smout for researching the case. IP Logged
 Pale Horse, Pale Rider Senior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 287 Joined: 12/26/12 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #111 - 02/20/14 at 16:23:57 dfan wrote on 02/20/14 at 14:46:26:I'd have to see the particular instance to which you refer, but sometimes this language means that the move has been played by a (relatively) weak player who didn't follow it up correctly, so the move has been played before, but the idea behind it is new. I do think that it is stretching things to still call that move a novelty in that sort of case. I think in this case the new move following the rare move should be labelled 'novelty' ... IP Logged
 dfan God Member Offline "When you see a bad move, look for a better one" Posts: 673 Location: Boston Joined: 10/04/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #110 - 02/20/14 at 14:46:26 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/20/14 at 14:15:13:But I can't claim that I fully understand the Chess Informant logic. Neither do I understand what the N stands for when John Shaw or Jacob Aagaard are using it. Quality Chess books contain sentences like "Technically this is not a novelty, but..." So it seems that there are cases when a move isn't new, but Quality Chess doesn't care and puts an N behind the move, because - well, I have no idea. When you know earlier sources which have given a move, why can't you just credit the earlier author? Wouldn't this be the honest thing to do? I'd have to see the particular instance to which you refer, but sometimes this language means that the move has been played by a (relatively) weak player who didn't follow it up correctly, so the move has been played before, but the idea behind it is new. I do think that it is stretching things to still call that move a novelty in that sort of case. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #109 - 02/20/14 at 14:15:13 Pale Horse, Pale Rider wrote on 02/20/14 at 12:10:07:Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/20/14 at 10:49:29:By the way - I wonder: who invented the N sign in opening books? Doesn't it basically have the same meaning as Oskar Cordel's sign * used in his Führer durch die Schachtheorie (1888)? The German theoretician defined the new sign on p. xi of the work as follows: This surely doesn't clear up the matter, but the * is nowadays being used in the pgn-files meaning 'unfinished game' instead of a result (1-0 etc), so i guess it can't be used in this context anymore. I always thought that TN and N meant the same thing: a new move that cannot be found in databases but I might be terribly wrong. Maybe the T underlining that the new move is of (possible) theoretical relevance and not just bad but new move in a given situation. Yes, this would be a possible interpretation: N for new move, a move not published before, TN for a N accepted as strong by the editorial staff. - But I suspect that Chess Informant had to reconsider their practice when the ECO series started. They had probably intented that in later Informants an N should only be used for moves not before considered in ECO volumes. Following this logic, the early ECO C had no use for "N" anymore. But in later editions the N sign made a reappearance. Apparently the N was too useful. But I can't claim that I fully understand the Chess Informant logic. Neither do I understand what the N stands for when John Shaw or Jacob Aagaard are using it. Quality Chess books contain sentences like "Technically this is not a novelty, but..." So it seems that there are cases when a move isn't new, but Quality Chess doesn't care and puts an N behind the move, because - well, I have no idea. When you know earlier sources which have given a move, why can't you just credit the earlier author? Wouldn't this be the honest thing to do? IP Logged
 Pale Horse, Pale Rider Senior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 287 Joined: 12/26/12 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #108 - 02/20/14 at 12:10:07 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/20/14 at 10:49:29:By the way - I wonder: who invented the N sign in opening books? Doesn't it basically have the same meaning as Oskar Cordel's sign * used in his Führer durch die Schachtheorie (1888)? The German theoretician defined the new sign on p. xi of the work as follows: This surely doesn't clear up the matter, but the * is nowadays being used in the pgn-files meaning 'unfinished game' instead of a result (1-0 etc), so i guess it can't be used in this context anymore. I always thought that TN and N meant the same thing: a new move that cannot be found in databases but I might be terribly wrong. Maybe the T underlining that the new move is of (possible) theoretical relevance and not just bad but new move in a given situation. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #107 - 02/20/14 at 10:49:29 TalJechin wrote on 02/19/14 at 16:30:00:I'll have a look at your 11.Qd2N in a few days. By the way - I wonder: who invented the N sign in opening books? Doesn't it basically have the same meaning as Oskar Cordel's sign * used in his Führer durch die Schachtheorie (1888)? The German theoretician defined the new sign on p. xi of the work as follows: Quote:Die von mir angegebenen oder empfohlenen Züge sind mit * bezeichnet. Zuweilen giebt diese Marke lediglich an, von wo ab meine Bearbeitung einer Wendung beginnt. On second thought, does his * sign really mean the same as the N sign which we see in more recent works? By his definition, Cordel is using the * sign only for moves suggested and recommended by him - moves that haven't appeared in earlier sources. He might as well have used the N sign, as a shorthand for "Neuerung / novelty", because this is exactly what he claims. Chess Informant has had various definitions of the N symbol. In volume 10 there are even two symbols: TN "a theoretical novelty / Theoretische Neuerung" N "Novelty / Die Neuerung". - I can't tell the difference between the two.  In vol. 11 N is defined as "A novelty / Die Neuerung". In later volumes, the TN has gone. Now it is just N "a novelty / eine Neuerung". I've also seen (where?) N defined as "novelty in the system of Chess Informant", or something similar. A definition that makes it possible to say "1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 Ne4N".  John Shaw gives no definition of "N" in his The King's Gambit at all. How many N moves in this work may be actual novelties? IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #106 - 02/19/14 at 16:53:44 PANFR wrote on 02/19/14 at 12:14:23:No, factly he doesn't mention the move at all.I had a brief look at 9.d4 sometime ago, and I concluded that it' equal- but I did not attempt any serious analysis, and the existing games on it (I have 25 of them, mostly from correspondence chess, although with little involvement of really good correspondence players) suggest that a draw is the most likely outcome.If interested, I can give you the related games- mostly ICCF/ IECG/LSS stuff from average. or less than average engine users. Thanks. Yes, I'd be interested in those corr-games. Please e-mail me a pgn file, if possible (redaktion@kaissiber.de). - I agree that White doesn't have much. But the result in Kaissiber tells us that there are many options for White, which can be tried and explored over the board. For example 9.Nd5 Qg6 10.d3 Qg3+ 11.Kd2 Nb4 12.Kc3 (Maurits Wind). In corr chess it will probably lead to a draw, but not more. And Black can certainly go wrong. So this opening looks very much like any other opening. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #105 - 02/19/14 at 16:30:00 Thanks Stefan! I'll have a look at your 11.Qd2N in a few days. Nice to see some new ideas for White at last! IP Logged
 PANFR Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 245 Location: Greece Joined: 10/31/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #104 - 02/19/14 at 12:14:23 Stefan Buecker wrote on 02/19/14 at 11:57:01:PANFR wrote on 02/19/14 at 11:52:43:I was not aware of the Kaissiber article, since I have never subscribed to it- I just have quite a few of your books/ pamphlets published in the 80s-90s, when I was playing more regularly. I noticed this flaw when reading Sakaev's Petroff book, dealing with the same variation, and also concluding that the position is a forced draw- apparently wrongly.Yet, the mainline in Sakaev's book is equal, although Black has all the fun there is in the position (IMHO not much, just a very,very slight positional edge, which is extremely hard to materialize). Thanks for the hint, so it seems I have to buy the Sakaev book. Does he cover the strongest move 9.d4? This is a line where I'd really prefer to be White. No, factly he doesn't mention the move at all.I had a brief look at 9.d4 sometime ago, and I concluded that it' equal- but I did not attempt any serious analysis, and the existing games on it (I have 25 of them, mostly from correspondence chess, although with little involvement of really good correspondence players) suggest that a draw is the most likely outcome.If interested, I can give you the related games- mostly ICCF/ IECG/LSS stuff from average. or less than average engine users. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #103 - 02/19/14 at 11:57:01 PANFR wrote on 02/19/14 at 11:52:43:I was not aware of the Kaissiber article, since I have never subscribed to it- I just have quite a few of your books/ pamphlets published in the 80s-90s, when I was playing more regularly. I noticed this flaw when reading Sakaev's Petroff book, dealing with the same variation, and also concluding that the position is a forced draw- apparently wrongly.Yet, the mainline in Sakaev's book is equal, although Black has all the fun there is in the position (IMHO not much, just a very,very slight positional edge, which is extremely hard to materialize). Thanks for the hint, so it seems I have to buy the Sakaev book. Does he cover the strongest move 9.d4? This is a line where I'd really prefer to be White. IP Logged
 PANFR Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 245 Location: Greece Joined: 10/31/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #102 - 02/19/14 at 11:52:43 I was not aware of the Kaissiber article, since I have never subscribed to it- I just have quite a few of your books/ pamphlets published in the 80s-90s, when I was playing more regularly. I noticed this flaw when reading Sakaev's Petroff book, dealing with the same variation, and also concluding that the position is a forced draw- apparently wrongly.Yet, the mainline in Sakaev's book is equal, although Black has all the fun there is in the position (IMHO not much, just a very,very slight positional edge, which is extremely hard to materialize).Regarding the Bishop's gambit, I am still quite satisfied as Black with 3...d5! - also equal, but Black has all the fun (again).The Nc3 lines in Shaw's book are very interesting, but they are also borderline refutable- which means I have not found any refutation, but I do think Black should have something against them. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #101 - 02/19/14 at 11:39:42 TalJechin wrote on 07/27/13 at 09:49:59:As for 3...Nc6 I thought White's activity would compensate for the extra pawn islands. Though nowadays Black seems to score a huge percent in this variation - although a couple of corr games still seem like a road to rough equality, but nowadays White seems to be the one avoiding these, maybe for a reason...? Your analysis in The Fascinating King's Gambit still holds in my opinion. But instead of 11.Ng3?, White should play 11.Qd2! intending 11...0-0 12.Qg5. When the queens are exchanged, there is not the slightest reason why Black's fewer pawn islands should be a factor. White's center may well be more important. A refutation of the King's Bishop Gambit this Black line is certainly not. IP Logged
 Stefan Buecker God Member Offline Posts: 1343 Location: Germany Joined: 02/11/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #100 - 02/19/14 at 11:25:11 PANFR wrote on 11/09/13 at 01:13:45:1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 d6 6. Nxg4 Nf6 7. Nxf6+ Qxf6 8. Nc3 Nc6 9. Nd5 Qg6 10. d3 Nb4 11. Nxc7+ Kd8 12. Nxa8 Qg3+ 13. Kd2 Qe3+ 14. Kc3 Qc5+ 15. Kd2He mentions this position as equal, while the truth is that white is in deep trouble after 15...Rg8 (most probably losing by force). [...] You are right. Same error in Kaissiber #32 (2008), p. 36: "12. Nc7+ Kd8 13.Nxa8 Qe3+ ist sofort Remis." After your recommendation 15...Rg8, a modern engine like Stockfish DD has no trouble finding 16.c4 Rg3 17.Ke1 Bg4 18.d4 Qc6 19.Qd2 Qxe4+ 20.Kf2 Nd3+ 21.Kg1 Ne1! 22.Kh2 Bg7! -+ and the myriad of other complex tactical variations necessary to force a win for Black. Kaissiber #32 appeared in 2008, the engine used for the analysis was Rybka 2.3.2a, run on my old Pentium PC. Still, I think a human should indeed understand that Black is better in spite of the fact that he is a rook behind. So yes, mea culpa. Shaw has just quoted older analysis, without crediting. A better excuse is that 12. Nxc7+ was "at least" a draw, so it was obviously worse than 12.Qf3 which I looked at in more detail. By the way: the recommended main line in Kais. 32 was Maurits Wind's idea 12. Kc3!?, a move ignored by Shaw. And, not to forget, Kaissiber #32 advised against 9. Nd5. Our choice was 9.d4!. - On p. 114 of his work John Shaw writes: Quote:This line [9.d4] could be dubbed the Bücker variation as the German analyst has published a lot of analysis about it. I believe the man himself called it the "Triumphlager" variation, but I can't see that catching on. Shaw is wrong, I never proposed such a name for 9.d4. The article published in Kais. 32 was titled "Am Triumphlager des Königsgambits", using a term coined by Tartakower: he joked that Spielmann's article "Am Krankenlager des Königsgambits" would have better been titled "Triumphlager", because Spielmann presented mainly his wins with the gambit. IP Logged
 PANFR Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 245 Location: Greece Joined: 10/31/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #99 - 11/09/13 at 01:13:45 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 d6 6. Nxg4 Nf6 7. Nxf6+ Qxf6 8.Nc3 Nc6 9. Nd5 Qg6 10. d3 Nb4 11. Nxc7+ Kd8 12. Nxa8 Qg3+ 13. Kd2 Qe3+ 14. Kc3Qc5+ 15. Kd2He mentions this position as equal, while the truth is that white is in deep trouble after 15...Rg8 (most probably losing by force). Typical case of an engine misjudgement, I guess there are more like that in the book.In any case, my most sincere respect to the author of the book, for spending so much effort and energy to such a sub-par opening. IP Logged
 Schwebbz YaBB Newbies Offline Posts: 26 Joined: 12/19/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #98 - 09/27/13 at 15:02:23 ooops. my sincere apologies. wow, that was embarrasing... IP Logged
 Bibs God Member Offline Posts: 2016 Joined: 10/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #97 - 09/27/13 at 06:23:34 And he is named 'Smerdon'.With no extra vowels. IP Logged
 Bibs God Member Offline Posts: 2016 Joined: 10/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #96 - 09/27/13 at 06:22:20 Schwebbz wrote on 09/27/13 at 04:38:23:Smeardon also says the Adelaide isn't covered. It is, on pages 645-653. Not hard to find at all, it's right there in the variation index. The chapter title 'second move alternatives' is also a clue. It seems to me Smeardon is blaming Shaw for his own reading difficulties. Good grief.Idiot. Rude idiot."Of course, I think it’s a shame that the Australian connection is left out, but it’s nice to see the line getting some reasonable coverage as it is certainly far better than first meets the eye."I blame you for your own reading difficulties.It is there, but not named such.Oh, irony, smite this contributor in the face with a hot iron. IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #95 - 09/26/13 at 03:35:09 I happen to own Who's afraid of the King's Gambit, but as I only recently came home from a holiday in The Netherlands I only now can comment.looks a bit better for White to me.So this is not what puts me off. Shaw's treatment of 6...Nf6 is.I took the time to brows through Shaw's book. It looks very, very good. The only reason I didn't buy it is that it just confirms the conclusions I arrived at five years ago or more:1. White has nothing, not even imbalanced equality after 5...d6 and 6...Nf6 in the Kieseritzky.2. If White plays g2-g3 in the Hanstein Black typically should reply with Alapin's ...Bh3.3. The plan with Qa4 and b4 in the Hanstein is not promising either, despite FM Bücker's laudible efforts.4. So what remains is the Quaade Gambit 4.Nc3.5. Black's best against the Bishop's Gambit is 3...Nc6.I rather disagree with GM's Smerdon's review. From glancing it immediately became clear to me that Shaw actually doesn't recommend the Kieseritzky, but rather the Quaade. The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 barnaby Senior Member Offline The night is dark and full of terrors. Posts: 322 Joined: 01/09/12 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #94 - 09/25/13 at 14:20:53 chessvibes review now uphttp://www.chessvibes.com/review-the-king%E2%80%99s-gambit IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #93 - 09/03/13 at 15:51:45 Schwebbz wrote on 09/03/13 at 15:28:34:That would depend on what your standards for 'juicy' is. The coverage isn't extensive: He annotates Schlecter-Teichmann, Vienna 1903. Seven novelties in the annotations. He quotes you twice, too. A little over 4 pages total. Looks good to me, though I haven't gotten around to examining the game in detail yet. Thanks, good to know!It is a bit surprising that he doesn't give 6...Be7 for Black in the Kieseritzky, but I'd assume that he doesn't recommend it for White and thus doesn't want to get bogged down with every equalising line for Black. But if the book is intended for both sides, then I'd imagine that 6...Be7 could offer Black better chances for the full point than 6...Nf6 - but it's at least a decade since I looked at the Kieseritzky so there might no longer be a need for another alternative for Black... IP Logged
 Schwebbz YaBB Newbies Offline Posts: 26 Joined: 12/19/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #92 - 09/03/13 at 15:28:34 That would depend on what your standards for 'juicy' is. The coverage isn't extensive: He annotates Schlecter-Teichmann, Vienna 1903. Seven novelties in the annotations. He quotes you twice, too. A little over 4 pages total. Looks good to me, though I haven't gotten around to examining the game in detail yet. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #91 - 09/03/13 at 11:57:33 Btw, has Shaw found anything juicy for White after 2...exf4 3.Nf3 f5 ? It's one of those lines that KG-players may go for when on the other side of the board. And I think it was recommended for Black in one of the early SOS books too. IP Logged
 ChevyBanginStyle Full Member Offline 2 \infty & *CRUNCH* Posts: 238 Joined: 01/03/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #90 - 09/02/13 at 21:59:32 This line is recommended by Eric Schiller in "Who's Afraid of the King's Gambit? (3rd edition)". I kid you not: search on amazon, "look inside" the book, and BAM!This actually looks like a decent line, so I find this all somewhat amusing.blueguitar322 wrote on 08/14/13 at 15:55:42:Also just got the book and enjoying it so far, even if I feel like White is still fighting uphill vs 3...g5 and 3...d5.One question: in the Kieseritzky 5...d6 line, Shaw mentions that he only wants to consider 6...Nf6.  However I have some notes on 6...Be7 (forget if they were from ChessPub, they aren't original analysis), which scores very poorly for White in databases. Am I missing anything? Did Shaw have a good reason to ignore 6...Be7? IP Logged
 Master Om Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 185 Joined: 02/20/10 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #89 - 08/22/13 at 19:11:01 flaviddude wrote on 10/22/08 at 02:30:45:The Kings' Gambit is a very complex opening. The repertoire books are good and white needs to know how to answer their recommendations. The positions that arise are quite different to other openings and difficult to play for both players. Furthermore the opening is still developing. Look at the articles by Stefan Bucker at Chess Cafe or the article in the latest Kaissiber. I am getting on in years and my over the board ability is falling. Nevertheless I use the King's Gambit in correspondence.  Over the board I would not hesitate to use the King's Gambit against significantly higher rated steady positional players who would expect to beat me. The fact that I know a good deal about the opening has a deterrant effect on my opponents. An Australian called Trevor hay wrote a book on the King's Gambit. For years after wards almost no-one played 1.e5 after his 1.e4. The same thing is happening to me.     A    further point is that you need good endgame technique to play the Kings Gambit as white.   How true!!! IP Logged
 TCH YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 18 Joined: 08/13/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #88 - 08/15/13 at 19:40:51 How could he miss Qh2??Lord Almighty, somebody put him on suicide watch if he loses the tiebreak (not serious, we all know Kamsky's a fighter at the bone) IP Logged
 barnaby Senior Member Offline The night is dark and full of terrors. Posts: 322 Joined: 01/09/12 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #87 - 08/15/13 at 19:02:16 TCH wrote on 08/15/13 at 18:40:19:Breaking News: 2. f4 refutes 1...e5.Absolutely sensational. wow... how did kamsky miss 29. ... rxf3 + ?  he must have been really rattled after surviving the minefield he built for himselfi think games like this which highlight the psychological side of chess are far more entertaining and fun to watch then the 'quest for truth' games that cc proponents and centaurs producegm blunderest fun  !! IP Logged
 TCH YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 18 Joined: 08/13/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #86 - 08/15/13 at 18:40:19 Breaking News: 2. f4 refutes 1...e5.Absolutely sensational. IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #85 - 08/15/13 at 17:30:23 barnaby wrote on 08/15/13 at 17:23:37:tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 17:22:51:tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:07:33:Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) seems like first white was winning, then black, then white, and now black more than seems .... black was busted!quite the houdini* escape by mr kamsky* pun NOT intended and no accusation meant .... i realized after posting that idiom probably is a bit too layered here Good (unintended) joke. Kamsky however is tying himself up again. Better for white at the moment! IP Logged
 barnaby Senior Member Offline The night is dark and full of terrors. Posts: 322 Joined: 01/09/12 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #84 - 08/15/13 at 17:23:37 tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 17:22:51:tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:07:33:Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) seems like first white was winning, then black, then white, and now black more than seems .... black was busted!quite the houdini* escape by mr kamsky* pun NOT intended and no accusation meant .... i realized after posting that idiom probably is a bit too layered here IP Logged
 tony37 God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 541 Joined: 10/16/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #83 - 08/15/13 at 17:22:51 tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:07:33:Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) seems like first white was winning, then black, then white, and now black IP Logged
 barnaby Senior Member Offline The night is dark and full of terrors. Posts: 322 Joined: 01/09/12 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #82 - 08/15/13 at 14:51:09 BreakThru wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:14:39:tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:07:33:Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) Thanks for mentioning! A big surprise to Kamsky it seems, already spending more than ten minutes after 2.f4. kamsky is apparently not a member here and does not seem to know these lines IP Logged
 tony37 God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 541 Joined: 10/16/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #81 - 08/15/13 at 14:25:04 I guess he'll play something not so exciting because he only needs a draw IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #80 - 08/15/13 at 14:14:39 tony37 wrote on 08/15/13 at 14:07:33:Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) Thanks for mentioning! A big surprise to Kamsky it seems, already spending more than ten minutes after 2.f4. IP Logged
 tony37 God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 541 Joined: 10/16/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #79 - 08/15/13 at 14:07:33 Shimanov is right now playing a King's gambit against Kamskysee http://chessworldcup2013.com/live (board 8) IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #78 - 08/15/13 at 13:56:05 [/quote]Shaw mentions that Sakaev gives this line, and that he only considers 8.Bc4.  Shaw recommends 8.d5!?  After three pages of analysis, he concludes "still a mess but White has the easier practical task." [/quote]Yes, indeed. A pity he didn't give additional analysis and or typical plans for white in this double-edged position. Usually he does this very well, but here it is somewhat too open ended for my taste. I think it is definately playable, but it requires soms home-analysis too I think.    The alternative at move 9 also deserves attention as it might be easier to play. Position remains about equal, but dynamic. If blackplayers follow Sakaev's advice, then they will be surprised by 8.d5!? Surprisevalue and preparation is also something to take into account in these kind of complex positions. IP Logged
 blueguitar322 Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 138 Joined: 07/27/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #77 - 08/15/13 at 12:46:14 TopNotch wrote on 08/15/13 at 04:45:55:I was recently browsing through The Petroff - An Expert Repertoire for Black by Konstantin Sakaev (2011) in it he analyses the Quaade variation and concludes that black is better and it is White who must search for salvation. Sakaev uses the game Zvjaginsev - Smirnov to illustrate his analysis, the key line centering around 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 f3 7.d4 Bb4!. His analysis seems convincing, so I am eager to comapre it with what Shaw has found when I get my hands on his book.Tops Shaw mentions that Sakaev gives this line, and that he only considers 8.Bc4.  Shaw recommends 8.d5!?  After three pages of analysis, he concludes "still a mess but White has the easier practical task." IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #76 - 08/15/13 at 12:16:39 Jonathan Tait wrote on 08/15/13 at 08:56:23:barnaby wrote on 08/14/13 at 21:03:51: i still think the best chance for a black advantage against best possible moves from white may lie in the modern defense ( 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. ed ef) while also avoiding any of the edgier lines in which white can play for at least some decent otb complications Black has no hope of any advantage in this line. But, as you say, it avoids all White's tricks and makes it a good practical choice over the board. I have to agree with that. The modern line might well be the safest choice for black. There are no revolutionary new ideas in this line, but with a bit of preparation it's still possible to surprise the second player. Objectively the chances are balanced though and the resulting positions are more positional than most lines in the KG. IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #75 - 08/15/13 at 12:09:38 TopNotch wrote on 08/15/13 at 04:45:55:I was recently browsing through The Petroff - An Expert Repertoire for Black by Konstantin Sakaev (2011) in it he analyses the Quaade variation and concludes that black is better and it is White who must search for salvation. Sakaev uses the game Zvjaginsev - Smirnov to illustrate his analysis, the key line centering around 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 f3 7.d4 Bb4!. His analysis seems convincing, so I am eager to comapre it with what Shaw has found when I get my hands on his book.Tops Shaw mentions Sakaev's work or course. According to Shaw however Sakaev only analyses 8.Bc4 (I can't check that myself because I don't own Sakaev's book). Shaw introduces the novelty 8.d5!?, after which, according to his analysis, black's best move is the less than obvious 8...Qe7. IP Logged
 Bibs God Member Offline Posts: 2016 Joined: 10/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #74 - 08/15/13 at 12:03:45 Bump. To remove the sloughter/sf dross for a time anyhow, talk about an opening text and theory.Good book, great fun so far. Impressive coverage of KG Declined, a line I know well. IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #73 - 08/15/13 at 08:56:23 barnaby wrote on 08/14/13 at 21:03:51: i still think the best chance for a black advantage against best possible moves from white may lie in the modern defense ( 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. ed ef) while also avoiding any of the edgier lines in which white can play for at least some decent otb complications Black has no hope of any advantage in this line. But, as you say, it avoids all White's tricks and makes it a good practical choice over the board. blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 TopNotch God Member Offline I only look 1 move ahead, but its always the best Posts: 1860 Joined: 01/04/03 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #72 - 08/15/13 at 04:45:55 I was recently browsing through The Petroff - An Expert Repertoire for Black by Konstantin Sakaev (2011) in it he analyses the Quaade variation and concludes that black is better and it is White who must search for salvation. Sakaev uses the game Zvjaginsev - Smirnov to illustrate his analysis, the key line centering around 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 f3 7.d4 Bb4!. His analysis seems convincing, so I am eager to comapre it with what Shaw has found when I get my hands on his book.Tops The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #71 - 08/14/13 at 21:11:14 tony37 wrote on 08/14/13 at 20:49:53:well, of course black has equality against the King's gambit, the real question is: does he have an advantage?which I think would be somewhere after 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4 d5 7.exd5 Bd6 8.d4 Nh5 It's not so simple. I don't know how you get to the conclusion that after 8...Nh5 black might have an advantage? In Shaw's book this line is analyzed pretty extensively with lines far past move twenty. I haven't found a line in which black is better yet, and given the complexity of the lines I pity the blackplayer in advance. You won't be able to find all the solutions calculating at the board. Preparation is necessary. However, as I mentioned above Shaw claims that black can equalize easily after 5...d6!. If he is right about that, then all the time invested in analyzing 5...Nf6 could be a waste.That's why he proposes 4.Nc3 after 3...g5. Allthough I agree with you that with correct play the chances are balanced, most of the time positions arise with a lot of dynamics. I have been testing the KG on the ICC and I can say that even IM's are not very knowledgeable of the KG-lines and often go wrong. Especially 4.Nc3 has surprisevalue. Admittedly, it's only G5 blitz, but still. I am used to play the Scotch but I am considering to give the KG a try in OTB. IP Logged
 barnaby Senior Member Offline The night is dark and full of terrors. Posts: 322 Joined: 01/09/12 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #70 - 08/14/13 at 21:03:51 tony37 wrote on 08/14/13 at 20:49:53:well, of course black has equality against the King's gambit, the real question is: does he have an advantage?which I think would be somewhere after 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4 d5 7.exd5 Bd6 8.d4 Nh5 interestingly shaw advises against the move 4.h4 and suggests the quaade style mentioned previously in this thread i still think the best chance for a black advantage against best possible moves from white may lie in the modern defense ( 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. ed ef) while also avoiding any of the edgier lines in which white can play for at least some decent otb complications IP Logged
 tony37 God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 541 Joined: 10/16/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #69 - 08/14/13 at 20:49:53 well, of course black has equality against the King's gambit, the real question is: does he have an advantage?which I think would be somewhere after 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4 d5 7.exd5 Bd6 8.d4 Nh5 IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #68 - 08/14/13 at 16:41:21 MartinC wrote on 08/14/13 at 16:04:48:Showing Nf6 to be solidly = would normally be taken as sufficient reason not to look for something even better for black. That's hardly precisely what white is after That sort of feeling of white fighting uphill is why I'm not convinced by it. I think your right about the reason for only choosing to analyze Nf6. Easy equality for black is not what white wants. That's why Shaw proposes 4.Nc3 as an alternative. With regard to 3...d5, I don't believe white is any worse. If black plays correctly chances are balanced I think. But there are plenty of ways in which black can go wrong. Up till now I have been testing Shaw's suggestions in blitz play with good results (even against a few IM's). Most of my opponents have no clue what to do. In the 3...g5 variation most players know the theory after 4.h4, but 4.Nc3 comes as a surprise. Of course it would be different in OTB games, but most KG-positions are so complex it's hard to calculate everything during the game. While it is still seldomly played (might well change!) most black players won't be well prepared. IP Logged
 MartinC God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1913 Joined: 07/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #67 - 08/14/13 at 16:04:48 Showing Nf6 to be solidly = would normally be taken as sufficient reason not to look for something even better for black. That's hardly precisely what white is after That sort of feeling of white fighting uphill is why I'm not convinced by it. IP Logged
 blueguitar322 Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 138 Joined: 07/27/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #66 - 08/14/13 at 15:55:42 Also just got the book and enjoying it so far, even if I feel like White is still fighting uphill vs 3...g5 and 3...d5.One question: in the Kieseritzky 5...d6 line, Shaw mentions that he only wants to consider 6...Nf6.  However I have some notes on 6...Be7 (forget if they were from ChessPub, they aren't original analysis), which scores very poorly for White in databases. Am I missing anything? Did Shaw have a good reason to ignore 6...Be7? IP Logged
 TCH YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 18 Joined: 08/13/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #65 - 08/13/13 at 23:01:51 BreakThru wrote on 08/13/13 at 18:44:16:TCH wrote on 08/13/13 at 13:45:09:BreakThru wrote on 08/02/13 at 14:53:23:zen_learner wrote on 07/27/13 at 13:20:14:Unfortunately, it was short lived. There is a serious dead end.Worse than the Berlin. Pity of such effort (his previous book on the Spanish was good, as it was Emms').The game is Zviangitsev-Smirnov. Deviations as white lead to a worse position. Uff. Unjustified criticism in my opinion. Let me give you some background information. In Shaw's book the variation 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 is analysed pretty extensively. The main focus is on 4.h4. This is still a very viable way of playing for white, however Shaw notes that Black can equalize after 4...g5 5.Ne5 d6! There is a very important exception however not mentioned by Zen_learner in his fatalism. At move 14 Shaw suggests the novelty 14.Dd3!? Thanks for the post but both 4...g5 and 14...Dd3 are illegal moves. I'll stick to 2.Nf3 for now. Thanks for the reply. 4...g5 is of course just a typo - which should be obvious (4...g4). 14...Qd3 is indeed an illegal move, but I wrote 14.Qd3. Oh, now I see what you mean. I am dutch and we use a 'D' in our chessnotation to denote the queen. Just a mistake on my part - I mean Qd3 of course. I don't understand why you would conclude to remain playing 2.Nf3 after reading my post?! haha, I'm kidding. Your post was excellent.First of all, the mainline is completely playable and 14.Qd3 is a wonderful alternative. I actually just got the book Peace out, man, and enjoy the World Cup. IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #64 - 08/13/13 at 18:50:57 MartinC wrote on 08/13/13 at 14:13:02:4 .. g4 that would be. Sticking to 2 Nf3 may well be sense though (On an aside, any Surtees watchers could do worse than look at his games in the recent British championship. Very different and mostly interesting.). I play 2.Nf3 as well, mostly the Scotch for that matter. I have been testing the KG on the ICC however for the last couple of weeks with great results against strong opposition. I might give it a shot in OTB as well. You are not convinced by the KG? IP Logged
 BreakThru YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 10 Joined: 08/02/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #63 - 08/13/13 at 18:44:16 TCH wrote on 08/13/13 at 13:45:09:BreakThru wrote on 08/02/13 at 14:53:23:zen_learner wrote on 07/27/13 at 13:20:14:Unfortunately, it was short lived. There is a serious dead end.Worse than the Berlin. Pity of such effort (his previous book on the Spanish was good, as it was Emms').The game is Zviangitsev-Smirnov. Deviations as white lead to a worse position. Uff. Unjustified criticism in my opinion. Let me give you some background information. In Shaw's book the variation 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 is analysed pretty extensively. The main focus is on 4.h4. This is still a very viable way of playing for white, however Shaw notes that Black can equalize after 4...g5 5.Ne5 d6! There is a very important exception however not mentioned by Zen_learner in his fatalism. At move 14 Shaw suggests the novelty 14.Dd3!? Thanks for the post but both 4...g5 and 14...Dd3 are illegal moves. I'll stick to 2.Nf3 for now. Thanks for the reply. 4...g5 is of course just a typo - which should be obvious (4...g4). 14...Qd3 is indeed an illegal move, but I wrote 14.Qd3. Oh, now I see what you mean. I am dutch and we use a 'D' in our chessnotation to denote the queen. Just a mistake on my part - I mean Qd3 of course. I don't understand why you would conclude to remain playing 2.Nf3 after reading my post?! IP Logged
 MartinC God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1913 Joined: 07/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #62 - 08/13/13 at 14:13:02 4 .. g4 that would be. Sticking to 2 Nf3 may well be sense though (On an aside, any Surtees watchers could do worse than look at his games in the recent British championship. Very different and mostly interesting.). IP Logged
 TCH YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 18 Joined: 08/13/13 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #61 - 08/13/13 at 13:45:09 BreakThru wrote on 08/02/13 at 14:53:23:zen_learner wrote on 07/27/13 at 13:20:14:Unfortunately, it was short lived. There is a serious dead end.Worse than the Berlin. Pity of such effort (his previous book on the Spanish was good, as it was Emms').The game is Zviangitsev-Smirnov. Deviations as white lead to a worse position. Uff. Unjustified criticism in my opinion. Let me give you some background information. In Shaw's book the variation 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 is analysed pretty extensively. The main focus is on 4.h4. This is still a very viable way of playing for white, however Shaw notes that Black can equalize after 4...g5 5.Ne5 d6! There is a very important exception however not mentioned by Zen_learner in his fatalism. At move 14 Shaw suggests the novelty 14.Dd3!? Thanks for the post but both 4...g5 and 14...Dd3 are illegal moves. I'll stick to 2.Nf3 for now. IP Logged
 Bibs God Member Offline Posts: 2016 Joined: 10/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #59 - 07/27/13 at 14:40:11 zen_learner wrote on 07/27/13 at 13:20:14:Unfortunately, it was short lived. There is a serious dead end.Worse than the Berlin. Pity of such effort (his previous book on the Spanish was good, as it was Emms').The game is Zviangitsev-Smirnov. Deviations as white lead to a worse position. Uff.OK. Back to Spanish/Italian/Scotch... Can you help people understand, with reference to the book (without quoting too much, a delicate balance) why this is 'a dead end'? What is the context for this? This may help others join the discussion.ThanksB IP Logged
 zen_learner YaBB Newbies Offline Be nice to others! Posts: 32 Joined: 06/20/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #58 - 07/27/13 at 13:20:14 Unfortunately, it was short lived. There is a serious dead end.Worse than the Berlin. Pity of such effort (his previous book on the Spanish was good, as it was Emms').The game is Zviangitsev-Smirnov. Deviations as white lead to a worse position. Uff.OK. Back to Spanish/Italian/Scotch... IP Logged
 MartinC God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1913 Joined: 07/24/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #57 - 07/27/13 at 10:06:46 Surtees is (in)famous for doing all sorts of genuinely unique things in the opening. Mostly to do with some of his theories to do with fixing the pawn structure before starting to develop - 1 e4 c5 2 c3 Nf6 3 f3?! for instance. I suppose that 3 c4 sort of fits that style.It generally works out OK when he's got white although with black he can get into rather bad trouble at times. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #56 - 07/27/13 at 09:49:59 Benoniac wrote on 07/27/13 at 00:03:18:TalJechin wrote on 06/28/13 at 18:11:14:Ametanoitos wrote on 06/28/13 at 13:18:55:He uses 35 or so pages to prove it! Or trying to prove it... If it's 3...Nc6 I already don't believe him.  Still, one can claim an academic "=+" to justify not dealing with something. A quite recent example is 1.e4 c5 2.f4 which everyone over 2000 would know should be met with 2...d5 and therefore White should play 2.Nc3 and only 3.f4 according to practically all books on the Grand Prix - and yet Sveshnikov is apparently advocating 2.f4 in his new book! Evaluations are re-evaluated all the time... I would say  that 3...Nc6 is a big challenge to the Bishop gambit. Well, there are many challenges to the KG... As for 3...Nc6 I thought White's activity would compensate for the extra pawn islands. Though nowadays Black seems to score a huge percent in this variation - although a couple of corr games still seem like a road to rough equality, but nowadays White seems to be the one avoiding these, maybe for a reason...?@snakebiteActually Surtees' 3.c4 seems new to me too, I can't find a single game with it in my databases. (However, there a two games with 1.e4 e6 2.c4 e5 3.f4 exf4.)I assume the plan is to eventually hide the king on c2 if Black's queen checks...? If you have any games with it available feel free to start a new thread on it. IP Logged
 Benoniac Full Member Offline Dont become what you hate Posts: 147 Location: norway Joined: 01/13/11 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #55 - 07/27/13 at 00:03:18 TalJechin wrote on 06/28/13 at 18:11:14:Ametanoitos wrote on 06/28/13 at 13:18:55:He uses 35 or so pages to prove it! Or trying to prove it... If it's 3...Nc6 I already don't believe him.  Still, one can claim an academic "=+" to justify not dealing with something. A quite recent example is 1.e4 c5 2.f4 which everyone over 2000 would know should be met with 2...d5 and therefore White should play 2.Nc3 and only 3.f4 according to practically all books on the Grand Prix - and yet Sveshnikov is apparently advocating 2.f4 in his new book! Evaluations are re-evaluated all the time... I dont got the book myself. But I would say  that 3...Nc6 is a big challenge to the Bishop gambit. Taljechins book is from 2004, and the engines has gotten very much more powerful since then. Also the QC-team has told the public about their "supercomputer" at their office a while ago, and surely John Shaw has had accsess to this. So it wouldnt suprise me if Shaw, if not refuted, has  made the Bishop Gambit not appealing for white. Ben « Last Edit: 07/27/13 at 09:44:58 by Benoniac » People dont live or die, people just floatB Dylan IP Logged
 zen_learner YaBB Newbies Offline Be nice to others! Posts: 32 Joined: 06/20/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #54 - 07/26/13 at 23:21:29 I got the book today, looked at some lines of the Kieseritzky and thought...Uh oh, 680 pages wasted... For the off-beat lines a 2600 gets thrashed recently by a 2500 (black) so things were looking pretty grim indeed until... Some wonderful variations. Some pretty good discoveries. Whether I'll be able to remember the analysis or risk playing the opening... too soon to tell. But it is very professional, it just goes in unsuspected ways ... It will remain the reference book in years to come.... IP Logged
 snakebite Junior Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 75 Joined: 01/25/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #53 - 07/26/13 at 21:17:29 The book does look great.  Interestingly I can't find reference to Mike Surtees' line 1 e4 e5  2 f4 exf4  3 c4 which he has even played versus Hebden! IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #52 - 07/26/13 at 14:13:08 My copy arrived this morning Just looking through it for an hour or so, I'm hugely impressed. Clearly loads of work has gone into this. Much respect to the author. blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 Jupp53 God Member Offline be Posts: 745 Location: Frankfurt/Main Joined: 01/04/09 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #51 - 07/20/13 at 19:42:17 Medical textbooks say I should be dead since April 2002.Dum spiro spero. IP Logged
 Smyslov_Fan YaBB ModeratorCorrespondence fan Offline Progress depends on the unreasonable man. ~GBS Posts: 6900 Joined: 06/16/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #50 - 06/29/13 at 14:57:13 Please, try to stay on topic. If you want a discussion on the merits of 1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5, take it to the Anti-Sicilians section. IP Logged
 trandism Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 181 Location: Greece Joined: 04/12/08 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #49 - 06/29/13 at 11:42:34 1.e4 c5, 2.f4 d5 is NOT =+ IP Logged
 ErictheRed God Member Offline USCF National Master Posts: 2184 Location: USA Joined: 10/02/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #48 - 06/28/13 at 20:18:35 TalJechin wrote on 06/28/13 at 18:11:14:Still, one can claim an academic "=+" to justify not dealing with something. A quite recent example is 1.e4 c5 2.f4 which everyone over 2000 would know should be met with 2...d5 and therefore White should play 2.Nc3 and only 3.f4 according to practically all books on the Grand Prix - and yet Sveshnikov is apparently advocating 2.f4 in his new book! Evaluations are re-evaluated all the time... And people write books to make a quick buck all the time, too. IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #47 - 06/28/13 at 18:11:14 Ametanoitos wrote on 06/28/13 at 13:18:55:He uses 35 or so pages to prove it! Or trying to prove it... If it's 3...Nc6 I already don't believe him.  Still, one can claim an academic "=+" to justify not dealing with something. A quite recent example is 1.e4 c5 2.f4 which everyone over 2000 would know should be met with 2...d5 and therefore White should play 2.Nc3 and only 3.f4 according to practically all books on the Grand Prix - and yet Sveshnikov is apparently advocating 2.f4 in his new book! Evaluations are re-evaluated all the time... IP Logged
 TonyRo God Member Offline I'm gonna crack your skull! Posts: 1688 Location: Cleveland, OH Joined: 11/26/07 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #46 - 06/28/13 at 14:16:33 That's it!? IP Logged
 Ametanoitos God Member Offline The road to success is under construction Posts: 1419 Location: Patras Joined: 01/04/05 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #45 - 06/28/13 at 13:18:55 He uses 35 or so pages to prove it! IP Logged
 TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2878 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender: Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #44 - 06/28/13 at 09:59:45 Hmm, I wonder if he can prove his "3.Bc4?!" or if it's just his way of avoiding 1200 pages... IP Logged
 proustiskeen God Member Offline Hello from Omaha! Posts: 544 Joined: 08/11/08 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #43 - 06/27/13 at 21:38:57 It should be noted that Shaw gives much praise to Micawber's notes here in the forum!  Check the acknowledgements in the pdf sample. IP Logged
 tony37 God Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 541 Joined: 10/16/10 Re: C30-C39: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #42 - 06/27/13 at 18:47:59 at last, the King's Gambit by John Shaw is finished and will (probably) be published on 12 Julya new excerpt can be found here:http://www.qualitychess.co.uk/ebooks/King%27sGambit-excerpt.pdf IP Logged
 micawber God Member Offline like many sneaks and skunks in history he's a poet Posts: 852 Location: Netherlands Joined: 09/07/05 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #41 - 07/27/09 at 07:18:35 Thx NMb,Now the game is afoot. After taking a second glance I am prepared todefend my King ('s gambit) like a true republican:7.Nc3! 7.....Nc6 8.d4,d6    9.d5 Nxe5 10.Nxe5 dxe5  11.Bb5+ 11......., c6!?N 12.dxc6,Bc5+ 13.Kh1,0-0 14.cxb7,Ng3+ is another fun line.On a more serious note:11.Bxg4             (iso Bb5+) 11.......,   Bxg4   (11..Nf6? 12.Bxc8 Qxc8 13.Qe2 +/-)12.Qxg4, Nf613.Qf5  , Bd6Leads to a rather wild position where both sides have chances.---------------------------------------------------------------------By the way MNb:another fun possibility in your own line is the equally wild15....Qb6+ (iso 15...Bxf5):16.Kh1,Bxf5 17.cxb7+,Ke7 18.bxaQ Rxa8 19.Bg5 (threat 20.Ne4+)when after 19...Be6 20.Bxf6,Kf8 the position seems almost normaland provide chances for both sides as well.---------------------------------------------------------------------By the way MNb:I do hope that poor John Shaw is following this Forum.And of course that he has invested in a subscription to the e4e5 area,so as not to miss the full content of the e4e5 past forum contributions and the 2009 King's Gambit Survey of yours truly. « Last Edit: 07/27/09 at 08:20:05 by micawber » IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #40 - 07/27/09 at 02:52:10 An interesting sample line involving a temporary queen sac is 9.d5 Nxe5 10.Nxe5 dxe5 11.Bb5+ Bd7 12.Qxg4 Bc5+ 13.Kh1 Nf6 14.Qf5 Bd6 15.Bxf4 c6 16.dxc6 Bxf5 17.c7+ Qd7 18.Bg5 Ne4 19.Rxf5 Nxc3 20.Bxd7+ Kxd7 21.bxc3 Kxc7 22.Rxf7 with some endgame advantage. This is undoubtedly not the last word; the complications are fun. The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 micawber God Member Offline like many sneaks and skunks in history he's a poet Posts: 852 Location: Netherlands Joined: 09/07/05 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #39 - 07/27/09 at 01:04:15 DavidFlude,Thx for sharing this game with us.That is an inspired sacrifice.1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e5 Nh5 5. Be2 g5 6. O-O g4 7. Nc3! My first impression is that White has excellent compensation if Black accepts this sac. Rather than "commit suicide"  I think Black should investigate7.....Nc6 8.d4,d6 with an unclear game.In your suggestion for the best defense:7... gxf3 8. Bxf3 Ng7 9. d4 Be7 10. Bxf4 d6  11. Bh6 Nf5 12. Bd5 Nxh6 13. Qh5  Rf8  14. e6 c6 15. exf7+ Kd7 16. Qxh6  Kc7 17.Qxh7 I agree that 17....cxd5 18.Nxd5 is winning for White.Black should play 17.....Nd7 I think, though White's compensation isno longer in doubt. IP Logged
 flaviddude Senior Member Offline I love ChessPublishing.com! Posts: 329 Location: Australia Joined: 01/12/04 Gender: another new line Reply #38 - 07/26/09 at 09:51:58 As the book is not yet ready the following game may be useful. I have already sent it to Kaissiber. FludeAm.pgn ( 4 KB | 113 Downloads ) I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #37 - 07/14/09 at 03:19:23 micawber wrote on 07/13/09 at 08:55:57:I think that White can claim an advantage after 9.Bd3! +/=. Not only you think this - so does Thomas Johansson in The FKG. The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
micawber
God Member

Offline

like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender:
Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit
Reply #36 - 07/13/09 at 08:55:57
According to the new Quality Chess catalogue, the book is still planned.
The expected publication date has been moved to December 2009.
So we have to exercise patience a little longer.
In the meantime a relatively recent game

[Event "Ch France (team) 2009"]
[Site "France"]
[Date "2009.03.21"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Shirazi Kamran (FRA)"]
[Black "Jakovenko Dmitry (RUS)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C36"]
[WhiteElo "2410"]
[BlackElo "2760"]
[Annotator Micawber]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 exf4 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. d4 Ne7!?
(5... c6 is the most solid reply I think; But if you out-rate your opponent by 300 ELO points, you probably arent interested in solid continuations.)
6. c4 c5
( White is a little better after 6... Ng6 7. Bd3 or 6... b6 7. Bd3)
7. b4!
(7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Bxf4 O-O unclear (Dubois,M (2080)-Chaude de Silans,C (2000)/Nantes 1993)
(7. Nc3 cxd4  8. Nb5 O-O 9. Nxd6 Qxd6 unclear ( Reich,T (2394)-Vogiatzis,D/Fuerth 1999)
7... b6  8. bxc5 bxc5 9. dxc5?
(I think that White can claim an advantage after 9.Bd3! +/=. White's last move will haunt him for the rest of the game, since the open diagonal a7-g1 makes it difficult for White to castle)
9... Bxc5 10. Bxf4 O-O 11. Nc3 Re8 12. Be2 Nf5 =/+

13. Qc2 Qf6 14. Rd1 Nh4 15. Nxh4 Qxf4 16. Nf3 Bf5 17. Qc1 Be3

In the rest of the game, white wasnt able to complete his development

18. Rd2 Nd7 19. Nd1 Rab8 20. Qc3 Nc5 21. Rd4 Bxd4 22. Qxd4 Bd3!

(23.Qxf4,Rxe2+ 24.Kf1, Rb1!-+)

23. Nc3 Bxe2! 0-1

(24.Qxf4,Nd3+ 25.Kd2,Rb2++; 24.Nxe2,Rb1+ 25.Kf2, Ne4-+)

IP Logged

 Zygalski YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 7 Joined: 02/21/09 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #35 - 05/03/09 at 20:25:22 Jacob Aagaard wrote on 10/26/08 at 08:53:02:This book has unfortunately been delayed a bit......I expect the book to be out in February, but this is not a promise.Jacob Aagaard Well I'm glad I wasn't holding my breath IP Logged
 SWJediknight God Member Offline Alert... opponent out of book! Posts: 889 Joined: 03/14/08 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #34 - 03/28/09 at 02:05:18 I prefer 3...Nc6 4.d4 g5!?, which is largely neglected in the books.  Play often continues 5.h4 (White could try to transpose to the Pierce Gambit with 5.Nc3 here, but I don't trust White's compensation after 5...g4 6.Bc4 gxf3 7.0-0 Nxd4) 5...g4 6.Ne5 transposing to a line of the Kieseritzky- admittedly not one of Black's most critical responses, but still probably sufficient for interesting and equal play.I've also had a few players try 6.Ng5 when after 6...h6 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 play usually transposes to a Hampe-Allgaier Gambit after a subsequent Nc3, and as per analysis on another thread, I assess the resulting positions as unclear/equal.I don't deny, though, that most theoretically critical remains the immediate 3...g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 (5.Ng5 h6 6.Nxf7, the "pure" Allgaier, is unclear but probably confers an edge to Black) 5...Nf6 or 5...d5.  And the Hanstein Gambit (4.Bc4 Bg7!) has been well covered recently too. IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #33 - 03/28/09 at 01:29:09 I would not dare to say that I don't need to find out much anymore about the main line defences of the KG. At the other hand I think I have found out enough already to combat irregulars like 3...Bc5 and 3...Nc6 4.d4 d6 with confidence. Moreover there are always the three principles of opening play: develop, control the centre, guard your king. Should be enough. The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 Zygalski YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 7 Joined: 02/21/09 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #32 - 03/27/09 at 22:32:02 kylemeister wrote on 03/27/09 at 22:19:28:At the risk of being old-fashioned or something, I don't think you can expect a standard sort of opening book to pay much if any attention to possibilities like 2...ef 3. Nf3 Bc5 or 3...Nc6 4. d4 d6; that's more the province of primers on the order of, say, Michael Basman's "Chess Openings."       But there is no resource for players who encounters these commonly played lines which are weaker, but not necessarily outright blunders.That was my point.I don't need to find out much more about the main line defences - I already have Gallagher's book.  It seems that Shaw is getting bogged-down with analysis, but perhaps the focus of many of these opening guides is wrong for the reasons I outlined above. IP Logged
 kylemeister God Member Offline Posts: 4205 Location: USA Joined: 10/24/05 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #31 - 03/27/09 at 22:19:28 At the risk of being old-fashioned or something, I don't think you can expect a standard sort of opening book to pay much if any attention to possibilities like 2...ef 3. Nf3 Bc5 or 3...Nc6 4. d4 d6; that's more the province of primers on the order of, say, Michael Basman's "Chess Openings." IP Logged
 Zygalski YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 7 Joined: 02/21/09 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #30 - 03/27/09 at 21:27:30 I think part of the problem here is that authors like Tait & Shaw get so obsessed with Fritz analysis of the solid lines that they cannot see the woods for the trees.  No doubt the potential authors get depressed with the workload and editing problems of such a complex system.What most of us want is a straightforward OTB battle manual for the KG, not some obscure but solid line in the classical defence that runs to 5 pages of analysis to move 30.I'm a lower intermediate and so most of my KG games are well out of book by move 10 anyway.Many Black players opt for questionable stuff like 2...exf4 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.d4 d6 or 2...exf4 3.Nf3 Bc5 & an overview of these commonly played lines & others would be of more use.Why are these moves not so good?  What are the thematics of these commonly played positions?  Writing a tome with deep analysis for GM quality play seems rather odd to me, since no GM's play this opening with regularity anymore & the only possible people to benefit would be top-end CC players.Intermediate (& better) club players play the KG regularly, so why not pander to the mass market & dare I say dumb it down a little?A case of K.I.S.S for these authors, perhaps? IP Logged
 micawber God Member Offline like many sneaks and skunks in history he's a poet Posts: 852 Location: Netherlands Joined: 09/07/05 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #29 - 03/03/09 at 19:50:47 @Markovich Quote: One recently popular idea that appears not to work, however, is 1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6.  After 4.Nc3! exf4 5.Bc4! Qh4+ 6.Kf1 f3 7.d3 fxg2+ 8.Kxg2, the position favors White, I opine. Markovich I think you are to pessimistic:(1) I agree that Black is worse in your line after 8....Bg4. However, 8...Nf6 is not exactly refuted (Ivanchuck-Piket, 1997). Piket passed up a good line to exchange into an unclear endgame.(2) I think that after 5.Bc4 black should answer 5....Nf6:A) 6.dxc6,Nxc6 7.Nf3,Bc5 gives black sufficient compensation (Vasilevich-K. Lahno, Moscow, 2008)B) 6.d4,cxd5 transfers into a line of the Bishops Gambit that is perfectly acceptable for Black (Bezold-Almazi, Altensteig, 1993 for example). Black can also contemplate 6...Nxd5.C) 6.Nf3 transfers to the Modern Defense.6.d4,Bd6 is less accurate as white can transfer to a position from the modern defense where he has a slight endgame advantage. « Last Edit: 03/04/09 at 09:15:27 by micawber » IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #28 - 03/03/09 at 19:04:38 Any news?When will the book be out??? IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #27 - 02/22/09 at 18:31:20 Hey guys, do you have suggestions or ideas how new book from Quality Chess about KG should look, and what should include?Perhaps can Mr. Aagaard or Mr. Shaw answer on following questions?a) which mainlines are recommendedb) is there any positional or endgame introductionc) how is theory structuredd) do we have quick repertoire scanse) are there any improvements regarding existing theoryf) will the book match latest oracle by Thomas Johansson "The Fascinating King's Gambit" IP Logged
 Zygalski YaBB Newbies Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 7 Joined: 02/21/09 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #26 - 02/21/09 at 11:01:47 If either Shaw's or Tait's KG books come out I will probably buy them & if they're anything like as good as Gallagher's Winning with the King's Gambit then I will recommend them in a forum I use on a site with 250,000 active members.May help shift a few copies. IP Logged
 Jonathan Tait Senior Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Nottingham Joined: 07/11/06 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #25 - 12/19/08 at 14:10:56 Jacob Aagaard wrote on 10/26/08 at 08:53:02:This book has unfortunately been delayed a bit, as other authors have finished books that we are producing. This is the problem of multi-tasking.John has dedicated most of 2008 to the study of the King's Gambit and I fear that he might have hit the place where he knows too much and have written too little. I understand how that isrossia wrote on 11/10/08 at 20:33:03:King's Gambit is very hard opening to play, much harder is to write a good book about it. Everymanchess has abondoned their project "King's Gambit Uncensored" by Tait. actually it's not completely dead as a manuscript, but I've been too busy with editing to do much at all on it recently blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/ IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #24 - 12/12/08 at 10:46:38 I wait a whole year for this book, and only recently I sadly witnessed that the delay may be terminal. What a disaster.Can you assure me Mr. Aagaard that this is not the case? IP Logged
 Markovich God Member Offline Posts: 6099 Location: Columbus, Ohio Joined: 09/17/04 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #23 - 11/11/08 at 13:04:36 I think that a strong player could easily crack up over the task of writing a "Play the King's Gambit" repertoire book.  On the one hand, there is an enormous mass of dubious 19th-century theory, ramified and "improved" upon by hordes of latter-day adherents, much of which leads to =+.  Many of these positions are best beheld in a mirror, lest looking at them directly turn one into a raving lunatic: the Rice Gambit or the Double Muzio, for example.  On the other hand, there are several effective modern defenses, including the Modern proper and the Modern Cunningham.  One recently popular idea that appears not to work, however, is 1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6.  After 4.Nc3! exf4 5.Bc4! Qh4+ 6.Kf1 f3 7.d3 fxg2+ 8.Kxg2, the position favors White, I opine. E.g. 8...Bg4 9.Qd2.  (It's a transpo to a known position of the Bishop's Gambit, of course.) Another fairly recent idea, 1.e4 e5 2.f4 Qh4+ 3.g3 Qe7 4.Nc3 exf4, I suspect on account of 5.Nf3 d5 6.Kf2! a little-known move that seems to refute Black's conception.  In surprisingly many KGA positions, Kf2 is the right answer to Black's queen on e7. The Great Oz has spoken! IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #22 - 11/10/08 at 20:33:03 Jacob Aagaard wrote on 10/26/08 at 08:53:02:John has dedicated most of 2008 to the study of the King's Gambit and I fear that he might have hit the place where he knows too much and have written too little. This is the truth.King's Gambit is very hard opening to play, much harder is to write a good book about it. Everymanchess has abondoned their project "King's Gambit Uncensored" by Tait. Not enough stamina? IP Logged
 Fernando Semprun Senior Member Offline Be nice to others. Life is to be enjoyed! Posts: 402 Location: Madrid Joined: 04/29/03 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #21 - 11/10/08 at 17:21:29 Yesterday I had a new look at Johansson's FKG (Bishop KG) and have indeed changed my mind. The opening is certainly playable, and much more than 2.c3 in the Sicilian, if I may say so.Toppy, abstain.P.S.: I was also surprised at the number of games still played in 2007-2008 in MegaBase Fernando Semprun IP Logged
 wcywing Full Member Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 176 Joined: 01/04/08 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #20 - 10/26/08 at 19:53:38 good thing i don't play KG. IP Logged
 TopNotch God Member Offline I only look 1 move ahead, but its always the best Posts: 1860 Joined: 01/04/03 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #19 - 10/26/08 at 19:17:57 rossia wrote on 10/26/08 at 13:12:37:We all do hope that all articles from this site about KING'S GAMBIT will be included, or better said, studied during writing a book:Here is an extensive list with themes and links: KG convert: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1172299697Death of King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1051657971Question: King's Gambit - FalkbeerCounterGambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1183146590KG (starting out by myself): http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1181744601Bishop's Gambit idea: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1180804929King's Gambit - Hanstein (3 Nf3 g5 4 Bc4 Bg7): http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1180629571Starting out with the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1172147953King's gambit - Estrin and Glazkov book: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1175357469King's Gambit Declined - Trouble castling!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1174873250Help with King's Gambit - Cunningham Defense: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1177291713Advice on King's Gambit Cunningham defense please: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1175210162A bust to the Kings gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1173396033KG: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1174578820Falkbeer 3...exf4!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1171277123King's Gambit line: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1170355343Help! Kings gambit questions!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1169261084A new look at the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1133354340Sad coverage of the King's gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1160757630KG Wagenbach Defence 3...h5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1152772884The Fascinating King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1105472123/0KGD: Schlemmer Counter Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1152957715KG - Fischer Defence: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1144000928King's Gambit 2...Bc5 3.Qh5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1076620899Hanstein Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1087669402An early ...f5 against the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1141639151Simple King Gambit line?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1148507124King Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1151064090King's Gambit - help!!!!!!!!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1151973610KGD/Bishops/Vienna: 6...Bxf2+!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1150437600King's Gambit 2.Bc5: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1138227320Spasskys Kings Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1131841601KG & QG: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1130689762King's Gambit Fischer Defence: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1058982490KG - Fischer Defence, 3.Nf3, etc: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1126198486Status of Falkbeer counter-gambit ?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1111825308McDonald's King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1101072198King's Gambit 2...Nc6 & 3...f5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1045379243King's Gambit/Modern Var: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1080450197sources on the king bishop gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1092124676Rosentreter Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1059304681Kieseritzky Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1087468719 OMG!!  Tops The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #18 - 10/26/08 at 13:12:37 We all do hope that all articles from this site about KING'S GAMBIT will be included, or better said, studied during writing a book:Here is an extensive list with themes and links: KG convert: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1172299697Death of King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1051657971Question: King's Gambit - FalkbeerCounterGambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1183146590KG (starting out by myself): http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1181744601Bishop's Gambit idea: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1180804929King's Gambit - Hanstein (3 Nf3 g5 4 Bc4 Bg7): http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1180629571Starting out with the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1172147953King's gambit - Estrin and Glazkov book: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1175357469King's Gambit Declined - Trouble castling!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1174873250Help with King's Gambit - Cunningham Defense: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1177291713Advice on King's Gambit Cunningham defense please: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1175210162A bust to the Kings gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1173396033KG: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1174578820Falkbeer 3...exf4!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1171277123King's Gambit line: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1170355343Help! King`s gambit questions!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1169261084A new look at the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1133354340Sad coverage of the King's gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1160757630KG Wagenbach Defence 3...h5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1152772884The Fascinating King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1105472123/0KGD: Schlemmer Counter Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1152957715KG - Fischer Defence: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1144000928King's Gambit 2...Bc5 3.Qh5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1076620899Hanstein Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1087669402An early ...f5 against the King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1141639151Simple King Gambit line?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1148507124King Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1151064090King's Gambit - help!!!!!!!!: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1151973610KGD/Bishops/Vienna: 6...Bxf2+!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1150437600King's Gambit 2.Bc5: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1138227320Spasskys Kings Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1131841601KG & QG: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1130689762King's Gambit Fischer Defence: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1058982490KG - Fischer Defence, 3.Nf3, etc: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1126198486Status of Falkbeer counter-gambit ?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1111825308McDonald's King's Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1101072198King's Gambit 2...Nc6 & 3...f5!?: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1045379243King's Gambit/Modern Var: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1080450197sources on the king bishop gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1092124676Rosentreter Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1059304681Kieseritzky Gambit: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1087468719 IP Logged
 Jacob Aagaard Full Member Offline Quality Chess says hi! Posts: 165 Location: Glasgow, UK Joined: 01/16/08 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #17 - 10/26/08 at 08:53:02 This book has unfortunately been delayed a bit, as other authors have finished books that we are producing. This is the problem of multi-tasking.John has dedicated most of 2008 to the study of the King's Gambit and I fear that he might have hit the place where he knows too much and have written too little. I expect the book to be out in February, but this is not a promise.Jacob Aagaard IP Logged
 flaviddude Senior Member Offline I love ChessPublishing.com! Posts: 329 Location: Australia Joined: 01/12/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #16 - 10/25/08 at 14:01:43 I just looked at all the John Shaw King's Gambit games on the Opening master 5,000,000 game database. They were all played between 1992 and 1995. He did not score well. However I did not like some of the lines that he played. Furthermore he is a much stronger player now then he was in 1995. I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit IP Logged
 flaviddude Senior Member Offline I love ChessPublishing.com! Posts: 329 Location: Australia Joined: 01/12/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #15 - 10/25/08 at 13:53:42 TopNotch wrote on 10/24/08 at 02:15:59:Personally I'm hoping the King's Gambit becomes a popular guest in current OTB play, particularly among the higher rated set, as this would make my task of playing for a win with either color less of a headache. Like so many sharp gambits, I think the King's Gambit could work best if used judiciously and in moderation.Toppy You might score more wins with either color but you would have to play really good chess. But isn't that the idea. I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit IP Logged
 TopNotch God Member Offline I only look 1 move ahead, but its always the best Posts: 1860 Joined: 01/04/03 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #14 - 10/24/08 at 02:15:59 I guess the best thing to do now is simply wait for the book to come out, or for those who can't wait could leave a message for John Shaw inquiring as to the format.Personally I'm hoping the King's Gambit becomes a popular guest in current OTB play, particularly among the higher rated set, as this would make my task of playing for a win with either color less of a headache. Like so many sharp gambits, I think the King's Gambit could work best if used judiciously and in moderation.Toppy The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones IP Logged
 flaviddude Senior Member Offline I love ChessPublishing.com! Posts: 329 Location: Australia Joined: 01/12/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #13 - 10/24/08 at 00:41:28 TopNotch wrote on 10/23/08 at 02:00:51:I maintain my view that the days of a repertoire book for White with the King's Gambit as the center piece are long gone.Maybe Quality Chess may prove me wrong, but I seriously doubt it. I believe that you would require too much knowledge to include a chapter in a repertoire book. You would need a specialist book. For example you would need 20-30 pages to deal with the Falkbeer Counter gambit adequately alone.TopNotch wrote on 10/23/08 at 02:00:51:What I expect is an up to date reference book examining the state of current theory without a bias for either side. That said I still expect Black to come out way ahead. That would be exellent. I do not think that black would come out way ahead. There are a few lines where things look quite unclear to me especially in the Kieseritzy Gambit if white knows what he is doing. However  white looks OK in most other lines of the Knights Gambit. In the bishops Gambit black can hold the position but I do not think that white is in danger of losing.Nevertheless the King's Gambit is harder to play well that other 1.e4 e5 openings. The resulting middle game positions are often even but very unbalanced. I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit IP Logged
 SWJediknight God Member Offline Alert... opponent out of book! Posts: 889 Joined: 03/14/08 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #12 - 10/23/08 at 20:44:25 Well, as I say, there are two repertoire books out there with early d4-gambits in the Italian Game, and 4.d4 against the Two Knights, as their centrepiece (A Startling Chess Repertoire, Chris Baker, and The Italian Gambit System, Acers & Laven).  Objectively those openings are considered easier to equalise against than the KG.  Yet they sold well. IP Logged
 TopNotch God Member Offline I only look 1 move ahead, but its always the best Posts: 1860 Joined: 01/04/03 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #11 - 10/23/08 at 02:00:51 flaviddude wrote on 10/22/08 at 02:30:45:The Kings' Gambit is a very complex opening. The repertoire books are good and white needs to know how to answer their recommendations. The positions that arise are quite different to other openings and difficult to play for both players. Furthermore the opening is still developing. Look at the articles by Stefan Bucker at Chess Cafe or the article in the latest Kaissiber. I am getting on in years and my over the board ability is falling. Nevertheless I use the King's Gambit in correspondence.  Over the board I would not hesitate to use the King's Gambit against significantly higher rated steady positional players who would expect to beat me. The fact that I know a good deal about the opening has a deterrant effect on my opponents. An Australian called Trevor hay wrote a book on the King's Gambit. For years after wards almost no-one played 1.e5 after his 1.e4. The same thing is happening to me.     A    further point is that you need good endgame technique to play the Kings Gambit as white.   The flip side of this argument is that when facing weaker opposition you expect to beat, then this Opening maybe less than desirable.I maintain my view that the days of a repertoire book for White with the King's Gambit as the center piece are long gone.Maybe Quality Chess may prove me wrong, but I seriously doubt it.What I expect is an up to date reference book examining the state of current theory without a bias for either side. That said I still expect Black to come out way ahead. Toppy The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones IP Logged
 flaviddude Senior Member Offline I love ChessPublishing.com! Posts: 329 Location: Australia Joined: 01/12/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #10 - 10/22/08 at 02:30:45 The Kings' Gambit is a very complex opening. The repertoire books are good and white needs to know how to answer their recommendations. The positions that arise are quite different to other openings and difficult to play for both players. Furthermore the opening is still developing. Look at the articles by Stefan Bucker at Chess Cafe or the article in the latest Kaissiber. I am getting on in years and my over the board ability is falling. Nevertheless I use the King's Gambit in correspondence.  Over the board I would not hesitate to use the King's Gambit against significantly higher rated steady positional players who would expect to beat me. The fact that I know a good deal about the opening has a deterrant effect on my opponents. An Australian called Trevor hay wrote a book on the King's Gambit. For years after wards almost no-one played 1.e5 after his 1.e4. The same thing is happening to me.      A    further point is that you need good endgame technique to play the Kings Gambit as white. I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit IP Logged
 rossia Senior Member Offline Saw: "Game Over!" Posts: 326 Location: Irkutsk Joined: 09/17/07 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #9 - 10/20/08 at 06:36:45 only 1% of chess players become GM. so all others are just amateurs.As a amateur and ex-club player, but nowdays as scientist and underground chess player, I'm very delighted to slaughter internet chess players on playchess.de server with KIng's Gambit IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #8 - 10/20/08 at 02:42:33 trw wrote on 10/20/08 at 00:16:58:its not the opening is unsound or refuted or scores badly but its romantic days are dead. Guess what - this is true for all openings popular between 1800 and 1914. The romantic days for the QGD and the English are over too. So this provides zero information. « Last Edit: 10/20/08 at 13:42:56 by MNb » The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 SWJediknight God Member Offline Alert... opponent out of book! Posts: 889 Joined: 03/14/08 Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #7 - 10/20/08 at 00:31:41 It might be dead at GM level (as indeed may most, if not all, of the alternatives to the traditional Lopez after 1.e4 e5), but I can vouch for the fact that the King's Gambit remains popular- and dangerous!- at club level, and is still occasionally seen even up to lower GM level.  Remember that only a small minority of chessplayers ever approach GM level.If such a KG book is well written I can see it raising a fair amount of revenue from lower-rated players.  I can think of a number of books on gambits that are even easier to equalise against, e.g. Goring, Danish, Max Lange, Belgrade, Smith-Morra etc, that sold rather well despite the openings being shunned at master level.  Or, for that matter, sub-optimal non-gambit lines like the Four Knights and Ponziani. IP Logged
 trw YaBB Moderator Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1191 Joined: 05/06/08 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #6 - 10/20/08 at 00:16:58 MNb wrote on 10/19/08 at 22:04:16:trw wrote on 10/19/08 at 21:46:02:rossia seems to have gone crazy for an opening whose romantic days are dead. Must have been the zillionth time these words are written. Peculiar that it still pops up again and again - and scores well. its not the opening is unsound or refuted or scores badly but its romantic days are dead. IP Logged
 MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10121 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #5 - 10/19/08 at 22:04:16 trw wrote on 10/19/08 at 21:46:02:rossia seems to have gone crazy for an opening whose romantic days are dead. Must have been the zillionth time these words are written. Peculiar that it still pops up again and again - and scores well. The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.GC Lichtenberg IP Logged
 trw YaBB Moderator Offline I Love ChessPublishing! Posts: 1191 Joined: 05/06/08 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #4 - 10/19/08 at 21:46:02 Fernando Semprun wrote on 10/19/08 at 16:24:43:TopNotch wrote on 10/18/08 at 15:50:06:The days for a Kings Gambit repertoire book are long gone, unless its aimed at Black. So this book is likely to be a general treatise on the opening.Toppy Is writing against KG your favourite topic?   Well the guy is right so its hard to dispute him? rossia seems to have gone crazy for an opening whose romantic days are dead. IP Logged
 Fernando Semprun Senior Member Offline Be nice to others. Life is to be enjoyed! Posts: 402 Location: Madrid Joined: 04/29/03 Gender: Re: John Shaw: The King's Gambit Reply #3 - 10/19/08 at 16:24:43 TopNotch wrote on 10/18/08 at 15:50:06:The days for a Kings Gambit repertoire book are long gone, unless its aimed at Black. So this book is likely to be a general treatise on the opening.Toppy