JonathanB wrote on 02/19/09 at 13:10:07:
Dink Heckler wrote on 02/19/09 at 12:36:05:
Thanks, guys. Some good stuff to chew on here.
I'll have a look at 4 c4 again. My general impression is that these structures seriously lack bite compared to, let's say, a typical Rubinstein Nimzo IQP.
Objectively I'm sure 4. c4 can't be the best move. Compare to a Panov-Botvinnik, for example, the pawn being on e7 not c7 must favour Black. Similarly, by delaying ... dxc4 until White move's his King's bishop Black is going to end up a tempo ahead of the Queen's Gambit Accepted line
1. d4 d5, 2. c4 dxc4, 3. e3 e5, 4. Bxc4 exd4 5. exd4
That said,
subjectively, c4 and the IQP positions that result present Black with different kind of problems that we French Defenders are used to facing. For that reason I would say it's White's best bet in the French Exchange.
3...exd5 is the suboptimal move. But having played it, I don't think I agree that 4.c4 (or 4.Nf3 and then c4) is necessarily suboptimal. It's simply one way of handling the position, but I do think it's the most dynamic by far.
Whether the defender has a c-pawn or an e-pawn determines two families of IQP positions, but which is easier for the defender isn't obvious to this amateur player.
This question of tempo is not insignificant, but it's not obvious that merely because the KB deploys before Black plays dxc4, White is worse (or whatever pejorative conclusion you want to draw about White's play here). Since I consider those positions that arise from ...dxc4 before the KB moves, which as you point out can also arise from the 3.e3 e5 QGA, to be clearly better for White, I don't wring my hands too much over the extra tempo. There are lots of other chess variations, the Tarrasch, the Panov and the Nimzo for example, where this happens and the IQP remains viable.
@Dink: You might want to start with Avrukh's treatment of the QGA with 3.e3 e5. Normally White won't have that extra tempo, but at least it'll illustrate White's play.