Latest Updates:
Normal Topic Keres-Attack with 6...e5? (Read 7089 times)
Harald Keilhack
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 10
Joined: 07/03/11
Gender: Male
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #6 - 08/03/11 at 00:18:29
Post Tools
LeeRoth wrote on 07/30/11 at 17:10:00:
It's interesting.  I thought the critical line to be  Kurnosov-Nisipeanu, Budva 2009.  After 12.Bxd8 gxf5 13.Bxd6 Nc6 14.Bc5 Qxd1 15.Rxd1 b6 16.Bd6 0-0-0 17.exf4 Nf4 18.Ne4 Rh4 19.f3 Nd4 20.Rxd4 exd4 21.Be7, when White had a significant advantage even if he failed to convert it.  But I see that Kurnosov later tried this line as Black, so maybe he had an improvement in mind.  Marin had suggested 16..fxe4 17.Nxe4 0-0-0 as a possible improvement for Black, but it hasn't been tried and the position still looks a bit better for White. Do you have something in mind here?    


In my file of internet games, both against IMs, I find 16...0-0-0 17.exf5 Nd4 (instead of Nf4) and 16...fxe4 17.Nxe4 f5 18.Ng3 Nxg3 19.fxg3. Both should be ok, and computers agree.

But I'm not so sure which lines are critical. It seems 7.Nf5 is now more often played by strong players. I haven't investigated 7...Nc6 yet.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LeeRoth
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 1381
Joined: 10/22/05
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #5 - 07/30/11 at 17:26:33
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/09/11 at 00:37:23:
IF I have the first moves correct, it seems that Nisipeanu has lost faith in 6...e5 7.Nf5 h5 8.g5 since his game against Naiditsch.

Azarov's play in the game cited in my earlier post also looks convincing.


Well, Nisipeanu continues to play 6..e5 vs the Keres Attack. 

I don't know if he's lost faith in 7.Nf5 h5 or if 7.Nf5 Nc6 has simply become the current trend. 

According to Marin's Chessbase notes, the Azarov-Nisipeanu game was equal up to 21.Kg2 and now, instead of 21..b5?, Marin gives 21..a6 22.Rh3 Ne7 23.Nxe7 Qxe7 24.Nd5 Bxd5 25.Rxd5 Rc6 26.Qd1 b5 when he indicates a personal preference for Black in a position that he says might simply be equal.
« Last Edit: 07/30/11 at 19:01:33 by LeeRoth »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LeeRoth
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 1381
Joined: 10/22/05
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #4 - 07/30/11 at 17:10:00
Post Tools
Harald Keilhack wrote on 07/06/11 at 21:30:42:
Hello,

is there anybody who has experience in this line?

IF this line works, it would be an elegant solution to the Scheveningen move order, and no reason  Cool to study the Main Line Najdorf just to avoid the Keres.

Against unprepared opponents, the move 6...e5 works rather well and leads to some original positions.

Theoretical issues:

a) 7.Bb5+ Bd7 8.Bxd7+ Qxd7 9.Nf5 h5 10.gxh5 Nxh5, and now the spectacular 11.Bh6!.
Incidentelly, it seems I was the first one who faced this move in a tournament game, some years later it became the main recommodation in White repertoire books.
I think Black is rather Ok after Nisipeanu's  11...g6! with enough compensation in the upcoming endgame.


It's interesting.  I thought the critical line to be  Kurnosov-Nisipeanu, Budva 2009.  After 12.Bxd8 gxf5 13.Bxd6 Nc6 14.Bc5 Qxd1 15.Rxd1 b6 16.Bd6 0-0-0 17.exf4 Nf4 18.Ne4 Rh4 19.f3 Nd4 20.Rxd4 exd4 21.Be7, when White had a significant advantage even if he failed to convert it.  But I see that Kurnosov later tried this line as Black, so maybe he had an improvement in mind.  Marin had suggested 16..fxe4 17.Nxe4 0-0-0 as a possible improvement for Black, but it hasn't been tried and the position still looks a bit better for White. Do you have something in mind here?    
« Last Edit: 07/30/11 at 18:59:54 by LeeRoth »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #3 - 07/09/11 at 00:37:23
Post Tools
IF I have the first moves correct, it seems that Nisipeanu has lost faith in 6...e5 7.Nf5 h5 8.g5 since his game against Naiditsch.



Azarov's play in the game cited in my earlier post also looks convincing.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #2 - 07/09/11 at 00:19:52
Post Tools
I'd need to see the first 6 moves before I could comment.

Is the position after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e6 6.g4 correct?

Here's a link to Nisipeanu's game against Azarov from earlier this year:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1611657
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uhohspaghettio
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 510
Joined: 02/23/11
Re: Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
Reply #1 - 07/08/11 at 17:18:14
Post Tools
I'm afraid it doesn't work, though it has "confused many White players". If Black can convincingly push d5 at some point it's usually much better than e5 against the Keres Attack.
  

"I don't recall saying good luck."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Harald Keilhack
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 10
Joined: 07/03/11
Gender: Male
Keres-Attack with 6...e5?
07/06/11 at 21:30:42
Post Tools
Hello,

is there anybody who has experience in this line?

IF this line works, it would be an elegant solution to the Scheveningen move order, and no reason  Cool to study the Main Line Najdorf just to avoid the Keres.

Against unprepared opponents, the move 6...e5 works rather well and leads to some original positions.

Theoretical issues:

a) 7.Bb5+ Bd7 8.Bxd7+ Qxd7 9.Nf5 h5 10.gxh5 Nxh5, and now the spectacular 11.Bh6!.
Incidentelly, it seems I was the first one who faced this move in a tournament game, some years later it became the main recommodation in White repertoire books.
I think Black is rather Ok after Nisipeanu's  11...g6! with enough compensation in the upcoming endgame.

b) 7.Nf5 h5 8.g5 Nxe4 9.Nxg7+ Bxg7 10.Nxe4 d5 11.Ng3! (11.Nf6+ works very well for Black), and now the original idea is the exchange sac 11...Nc6 12.Nxh5 Rxh5 13.Qxh5 Nd4. Though it has still good statistics, I doubt this is not correct after 14.Bd3!, and it seems there are some guys on ICC who can even convincingly refute this in a Blitz game.

But there are possiblities like 11...Bg4.
Someone has checked this stuff?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo