Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Is the Classical Sicilian that bad? (Read 11199 times)
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 688
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #52 - 09/09/17 at 09:48:44
Post Tools
TN wrote on 09/09/17 at 03:13:23:
Also, I worked on this ...Be7/...0-0 a couple of years ago but found some problem lines. It's better to play 7...a6 8.0-0-0 Bd7 in my opinion.


According to computer engines, the unlikely looking 11. .. b6 is the improvement in the Fischer game. That at least enables the Bishop to emerge at a6, even if it does block the retreat of the Queen.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3385
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #51 - 09/09/17 at 03:13:23
Post Tools
That hilarious game below:



Also, I worked on this ...Be7/...0-0 a couple of years ago but found some problem lines. It's better to play 7...a6 8.0-0-0 Bd7 in my opinion.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4233
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #50 - 09/09/17 at 01:40:29
Post Tools
FreeRepublic wrote on 09/08/17 at 21:39:16:
I played white in a speed game.

After
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 h6 10. Bh4,

I was surprised by ...a6.

It is a perfectly natural move and seems to lead to reasonable play. If there is a refutation, it was not immediately obvious to me.


Hmm, in a Russian opening encylopedia from the '90s, V. Osnos (who co-authored The Complete Richter-Rauzer with Peter Wells) awarded 10...a6 a question mark, giving 11. Nxc6 bc 12. e5 etc. from a game Matanovic-Sofrevski. 

(Side note:  I know of Sofrevski mainly from an account that he was prepared by Geller for a game against Fischer, which resulted in Fischer winning in 19 moves.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #49 - 09/08/17 at 21:39:16
Post Tools
I played white in a speed game.

After
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 h6 10. Bh4,

I was surprised by ...a6.

It is a perfectly natural move and seems to lead to reasonable play. If there is a refutation, it was not immediately obvious to me.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #48 - 06/19/17 at 17:30:42
Post Tools
You are right. 11...Bd7 really is a sideline (a very rare one). It would have been nice to make it work.

I've shifted my attention to:
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Qa5 12. Bc4 e5 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Qd3.

I discussed this a little in a post a couple days ago.

It's not a new line. In fact it is one of black's main lines. I was not optimistic at first, but I'm starting to like it for black.

There are a lot of nuances for both sides, so preparation and experience may pay good dividends.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jdart
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 14
Location: San Jose, CA
Joined: 12/12/10
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #47 - 06/19/17 at 14:48:58
Post Tools
Note though that 11. .. Bd7 is really a sideline: the most common move by far is 11. .. Qa5 (also possible is 11. .. a6).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CarriedbyGg
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 77
Joined: 02/06/15
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #46 - 06/19/17 at 11:37:46
Post Tools
Jup. The positions after 12 e5 look very prospectless for Black and what the main problem is: it's just sooo easy for White to calculate that far! And it's not hard to assess this position as better for White, either.
Most people that play the Sicilian and are reasonably educated should at least know that these Bxf6, Qxd6 stuff often results in good compensation for Black and therefore should rather refrain from doing that, which means they will start calculating e5 pretty soon and that's where the fun ends, right?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mn
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 167
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #45 - 06/19/17 at 03:52:21
Post Tools
It does look like Black has a few decent options against 12 Bxf6, and indeed 12 e5 appears to be the real issue.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
jdart
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 14
Location: San Jose, CA
Joined: 12/12/10
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #44 - 06/19/17 at 02:31:11
Post Tools
It looks like after some fairly deep analysis (Stockfish 8 to depth 40) that Black has some equalizing lines after 13. .. Bh4. Both 14. exd6 Qa5 and 14. exd6 Bc6 appear to work. In the former line Stockfish likes 15. a3 instead of Pruijsser's 15. Qe5, although Qe5 may be ok too with correct play. (Note too I am not saying the computer is infallible here: take with a grain of salt).


« Last Edit: 06/19/17 at 11:04:15 by jdart »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #43 - 06/17/17 at 01:14:57
Post Tools
Well the line I considered for black:

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Bd7 12. e5 dxe5 13. fxe5 Nd5 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Nxd5 exd5 16. Bd3! Rfe8 is suffering, as detailed by MN.

Alex Yermolinsky covers many lines in his book. Here is one found on pg 75.

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Qa5 12. Bc4 e5 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Qd3. The play up to this point seems natural. Black has not had to contort himself to stay in the game (at least not yet). Alex explains his game against Michael Adams in detail. He suggests a few more moves as possibly most precise: 15...Bg4 15. Rdf1 Rac8 16. Bxf6 Bxf6 17Bb3.

There are some tactics under the surface. For example Alex mentions the natural 16Bb3 Rxc3! 17Qxc3 Qxc3 18bxc3 Ba3ch 19Kb1 Nxe4 with advantage to black.

After 17Bb3, black might reply with Bh4, or Be6, or R(f)d8. Besides 17Bb3, white can consider 17Kb1 and 17Nd5.

I rather like the lines where black plays Be6 allowing Bxe6 fxe6. Black gets control of central squares with his doubled e pawns and the open f file can prove beneficial.

Yermolinsky present the moves ...Bg4 and ...Bh4. This bishop duo on the king side looks odd to me, but it seems they can gum up the works in white's hoped-for attack.

Working with Stockfish, it seems that black can get chances. However, practice has favored white. So I suggest that players of the black pieces prepare. Try to get a feel and understanding for this line before your first game.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mn
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 167
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #42 - 06/14/17 at 19:58:23
Post Tools
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

I feel like White should be at least a little better here objectively, and I think Black faces a thankless practical task:

1. White was more space (which you mentioned)
2. White has a better Bishop
3. Black's King looks more likely to come under attack than White's.

After 17 Rhe1 Be6 18 Kb1 (18 Re3!?) 18...Rec8, while I assume you wouldn't advocate playing the ...Rc5/...b5 plan automatically, here's an example of what can happen if Black does:

19 Re3 Rc5 20 Rg3 b5?! 21 Qe3 Kh8 22 Rf1 (followed by Rf4-h4)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

Point being, White's attack has the potential to develop a lot more quickly, as the ...h6 hook gives him a target (which Black lacks on the Queenside).

Of course, Black can always try to bail out with something like 19...Qc5, when in addition to 20 Qf4, 20 c3 is probably good, as any ending like this:

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

is clearly thankless for Black.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #41 - 06/14/17 at 04:29:43
Post Tools
After
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Bd7!? 12. e5 dxe5 13. fxe5 Nd5 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Nxd5 exd5 16. Bd3!material is even and each side has a weak central
pawn. Both kings can come under attack. White has a little more space. So it sounds like it could be even if black proceeds with care.

I think black does best to play 16...Rfe8!?
White can defend with either rook.
If 17. Rde1, ...Bf5! seems Ok.
If 17. Rhe1, I recommend 17...Be6. After a typical 18Kb1, R(e)c8 intends Rc5 followed with ...b5.

Either way, a typical tense RR game ensues.

So now all we need is are reliable answers to 9f3 and 9Nb3. That shouldn't be too hard.  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #40 - 06/12/17 at 18:54:36
Post Tools
After 6. Bg5 e6  7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Bd7 12. e5 dxe5 13. fxe5 Nd5 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Nxd5 exd5, black is OK if white plays the obvious move 16Qxd5. Black can respond with Bg4 or Bc6 with a good game despite being a pawn down.

Unfortunately 16. Bd3! seems to favor white somewhat, as far as I can tell.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mn
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 167
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #39 - 06/11/17 at 22:11:49
Post Tools
Fair point. I suppose in the version without ...h6, Black would do better to take on b2 instead of ...Bd4, but that looks like it leads to a Rook ending that's better for White.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
FreeRepublic
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 21
Location: Georgia
Joined: 06/08/17
Gender: Male
Re: Is the Classical Sicilian that bad?
Reply #38 - 06/11/17 at 21:55:02
Post Tools
There is an Informant monograph (FIDE chess) on B60-5.

Glenn Wilson did some great analysis. 15...Qb6!? can be used against both 15Qb4 and 15Qe3. Still 15Qb4 a5!? has a certain RR charm.

I would love to do without h6. But consider the following line:

6. Bg5 e6  7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O 9. f4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 h6 11. Bh4 Bd7 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. Qxd6 Bc6 14. Qxd8 Rfxd8 15. Bb5 Bxc3 16. Bxc6 Bd4 17. Bxb7 Rab8 18.c3 Be3+ 19. Kc2 Rxd1 20. Rxd1 Rxb7

Isn't it nice to have luft?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo