Hello.
Michael Ayton wrote on 12/05/15 at 01:41:18:
I was just a bit surprised you do not prefer Kramnik's 4 ..a6, I guess, though I do not know what to do against 5 h3 (5 ...Bg7 6 f4) here -- does anyone?
Vigus in Chess Developments the Pirc (Everyman Chess 2012) shows (on p.168-171) a few pitfalls and interesting ideas in the 4...a6 5.h3 line. After your:
(1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 a6 5.h3 Bg7 6.f4)
he gives:
(1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 a6 5.h3 Bg7 6.f4 0-0 7.Nf3 Nc6) plus also (7...b5) and (7...e6) and seems to slightly favour 7...Nc6.
Personally (and I don't often play 4...a6, be aware) I would instead of the above mentioned moves consider:
(1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 a6 5.h3 Bg7 6.f4 0-0 7.Nf3 Nfd7!?)
With the point that white on his next move ideally would like to develop his light square bishop to a nice square (basically d3) or possibly make some active move like e5. However considering that black can now hit white with a fast c5 he may have to do something else; less in accord with the demands of the position. A few continuations for example:
(8.e5 c5) With counterplay.
(8.Bd3 c5) The tension in the centre favours black who can further improve his position with b7-b5 quite easily.
(8.h4 Nf6) It seems unlikely that any attack would succeed after white has given up the kingside light squares.
(8.g4 b5!?) In the structure after b5 it is not really certain that white would have liked to play g2-g4.
(8.Be2 c5) White's position does not seem that threatening after he posts the bishop on e2.
(8.Qd2 b5) And while white has reasonable coordination and still some chances for aggression one can ask if queen really belongs on d2. Maybe using the fact that the queen defends e3 by going
9.h4!? Nf6 10.e5! Ng4 (not forced but natural) 11.h5 can be mildly dangerous, but the position does not seem that clear.
Michael Ayton wrote on 12/07/15 at 22:57:47:
In the 4 Be3 a6 5 g4 line, I reckon 5 ...Nbd7!? is OK here as well after:
I 6 g4 b5 7 g5 Nh5 7 Be2 Bb7!
II 6 f4 b5 7 e5 b4!
III 6 Nf3 e5! 7 de de 8 Bc4 Bg7 9 0-0 0-0.
Does Moskalenko say anything about this, I wonder?
Nope. After he (1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 a6 5.h3) he dribbles himself away by writing that after 5...Bg7 6.a4 the position transposes into one of his illustrative games
(see the Perfect Pirc Modern p.151).
Thus the variation with 5.h3 followed by f4 is not covered. There is decent coverage of 5.f4 though, instead of 5.h3.
Have a nice day.