Thanks
In fact, I am now sure I was right about such addendum"
In the thread "Any bets on Reinderman's use of Alekhine's Defence" I have seen the following post by Paddy ( "Phil Adams ?)
"The game has already been analysed by Dennis Monokroussos at his always topical website:
http://www.thechessmind.net/storage/chess-posts/eicc2010_rd3.htm and by Marin (!) at
http://www.chessbase.de/cbm/cbm134/cbm134-09/nisipeanu_reindermann.htm "
Unfortunately, the second link does not work and this is not in CBM 134 since I have this issue !!
If anyone has this file ...
I was asking about this file only for completeness on my files since I am not comfortable (far from it) with using 8...0-0 and even the recent 11...c5 may not work.
What about the ugly 11...h5? After all it is what everybody plays after 11...c5 12 c4. So why not playing it without interpolating the c pawn moves?
Concerning 8...Qe7 I think it works although Tony Ro pointed out the irritating alternative move 10.dxe5 (but i think Black is ok if prepared). I was also aware of these two recent games by Bortnyk (Kovalev - Bortnyk (0-1) and Ostrovskiy-Bortnyk (1-0), right?). Both are interesting and in these two Black pushed forward his queen side pawns, should White allow this?. The game he lost is quite wild and far from the boring endgame some authors say about this position. Unfortunately, he lost, not because of the opening, and unfortunately many good games (at least from the opening theory point of view) got "forgotten" due to the result only.
What about trying to revive 14...Nc6? The main disadvantage is that Black is allowing White the choice between a few sensible moves.