Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Yusupov’s 9 Book Series (Read 13299 times)
dfan
God Member
*****
Offline


"When you see a bad move,
look for a better one"

Posts: 695
Location: Boston
Joined: 10/04/05
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #53 - 03/29/17 at 13:54:09
Post Tools
Paul Brondal wrote on 03/29/17 at 11:43:38:
I'm not crazy about Soltis' book on pawn structures; to me it seems fair to compare it with Flores' book which goes much deeper without being all that tough. Furthermore, the latter has a lot of exercises which I believe is the way to go to become a stronger chess player...

I think it is fair to give Pawn Structure Chess some credit for having been published in 1976, 14 years before Flores was born.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 79
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #52 - 03/29/17 at 11:43:38
Post Tools
I really enjoy the above Soltis book which contains a lot of excellent exercises. On page 9 the following is stated: This book will not make you a grandmaster Smiley

I'm not crazy about Soltis' book on pawn structures; to me it seems fair to compare it with Flores' book which goes much deeper without being all that tough. Furthermore, the latter has a lot of exercises which I believe is the way to go to become a stronger chess player...
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
LeeRoth
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 1313
Joined: 10/22/05
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #51 - 03/28/17 at 23:54:26
Post Tools
Soltis has written a number of books for Batsford.  Among others, his What it Takes to Become a MasterPaul Brondal wrote on 03/27/17 at 10:59:48:
I don't know if this one is off-topic but in the weekend I bought Soltis' How to become a Grandmaster. Naturally, only really stupid people buy a book with this title  Wink


Earlier, Soltis wrote What it Takes to Become a Chess Master.  It's also a good book, and the goal is more attainable.  Wink

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 238
Location: London
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #50 - 03/28/17 at 22:56:27
Post Tools
I don't believe that the Yusupov books (the orange ones, anyway) are aimed at a higher end of club player than Soltis'. I'm sure Yusupov honestly intended them to be suitable for the rating bands originally identified. But, as he admits in the interview, he didn't entirely succeed.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RoleyPoley
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 437
Location: London
Joined: 12/29/13
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #49 - 03/27/17 at 20:42:31
Post Tools
Paul Brondal wrote on 03/27/17 at 10:59:48:
I don't know if this one is off-topic but in the weekend I bought Soltis' How to become a Grandmaster. Naturally, only really stupid people buy a book with this title  Wink

Anyway, in the above it is clear that Yusupov may find it difficult to understand club players. I'm not, in general, a big fan of Soltis' books but I like what I've read so far in the above. To me it seems clear that Soltis understands club players as the above book has "50 attributes of grandmaster thinking" as he puts it. The topics explain the difference between amateurs and grandmasters. For example, the first topic Uber Luft shows how GM's may play h4 instead of h3 to avoid back-rank mates where many players would choose h3. It is very interesting!


I like Soltis' work. It's usually his older opening books that attract criticism for being rushed, or less than thorough. His historical books tend to be well thought of, and his more explanatory books (his book on pawn structures and the one you had mentioned for example). However, i think he is writing for a different audience to that of Yusupov, whose books are probably aimed at a higher end of club player than Soltis.
  

"As Mikhail Tal would say ' Let's have a bit of hooliganism! '"

Victor Bologan.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 79
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #48 - 03/27/17 at 10:59:48
Post Tools
I don't know if this one is off-topic but in the weekend I bought Soltis' How to become a Grandmaster. Naturally, only really stupid people buy a book with this title  Wink

Anyway, in the above it is clear that Yusupov may find it difficult to understand club players. I'm not, in general, a big fan of Soltis' books but I like what I've read so far in the above. To me it seems clear that Soltis understands club players as the above book has "50 attributes of grandmaster thinking" as he puts it. The topics explain the difference between amateurs and grandmasters. For example, the first topic Uber Luft shows how GM's may play h4 instead of h3 to avoid back-rank mates where many players would choose h3. It is very interesting!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 79
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #47 - 03/24/17 at 12:08:19
Post Tools
I find the interview extremely entertaining. It is also great to hear him say, as Straggler wrote, that the rating ranges are approximate. It may be an excellent idea to make books like  Gulko's Lessons with a Grandmaster where a non-elite player is the co-author of the book.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 238
Location: London
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #46 - 03/24/17 at 11:48:50
Post Tools
Incidentally, I've noticed an annoying aspect of the Steps books, which are discussed earlier in this thread: the publishers seem to let the updates get out of kilter, so that the answers in the current edition of a manual don't always match the exercises in the current edition of the corresponding workbook. It's not a major problem because you can check for yourself whether your answer is right, and indeed that is (or should be) part of the exercise. But it's inconvenient, and I haven't seen it pointed out elsewhere.

Edit: Ah, but I now see that the answers for the latest edition can be downloaded from their website. So not a problem at all. (I also see that I got one wrong which I was sure I had got right, so it's worth checking the answers.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 238
Location: London
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #45 - 03/24/17 at 10:08:17
Post Tools
The QC blog now has a video of Aagaard interviewing Yusupov about the series. In response to Aagaard's suggestion that the advertised rating bands are "wrong", Yusupov admits that they are "approximate": "a big difficulty was not to push too much over the target, which of course I partly failed". He does admit that he is "over-qualified" for such a project, because "as a grandmaster" (a bit of an under-statement!) he "sometimes" doesn't know what a club player would be thinking.

There is some discussion of the importance of writing down the variations, but no clarification of whether the reader is supposed to do this while calculating them or only afterwards.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby
Senior Member
****
Offline


The night is dark and
full of terrors.

Posts: 324
Joined: 01/09/12
Gender: Female
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #44 - 03/06/17 at 22:09:39
Post Tools
ReneDescartes wrote on 03/06/17 at 16:56:14:
Paul Brondal wrote on 03/02/17 at 07:02:59:
ReneDescartes, in general I really enjoy reading your comments which are eloquent and full of insight. I also  understand your point about the challenge. However, here I find you are a bit harsh. Sure, Aagaard's suggestions for reading the books are at a much faster pace than Yusupov's recommendations as you write. On the other hand, even though Yusupov's books are superb, it doesn't mean that you have to use the books exactly as he points out. In Saddler's review of a Yusupov book, it is clear that he doesn't follow the recommendations but still gives the books a high grade.

Over the past few years, I have teased a chess friend about him having all of Yusupov's books but never reading them. The challenge was an incentive for him to start reading them. He wrote me that I have given him such a bad conscience but seeing the post on QC was what could seriously make him try the challenge.

I find Aagaard a very nice and helpful guy and I have a high regard about his person. When you see what is offered on the market with over-priced videos, low-quality chess books and so on, I don't see a problem here Smiley

Honestly, very inventive harsh expressions often occur to me, but I try to exercise restraint because I think that what is negative is usually vain in every sense of the word.

This is just a post in a chess forum, but I have noticed that, even in very great works, what is ultimately negative--for example, masterful sarcasm by Voltaire against the church--is eventually forgotten, while what  is of positive inherent interest, though it might be, for example, tragic, is remembered. But these matters are both subtle and complicated. I very much respect Oscar Wilde, for example. Anyway, I aspire to take care on this point whenever I write or speak.

I retract the first two paragraphs of the quoted post--the "Super Yusupov Challenge" and the reference to not upholding professed standards. I would be glad to ask a mod to delete it if other posters would agree to take it out of their quotes.

On the other hand, I stand by the last paragraph, which is not exaggerated with too-clever writing. Aagard is a tough-talking teacher of integrity--that's no act--as well as a businessman. Though clearly a super-GM talent like Sadler hardly needs to do the material the suggested way to get maximum benefit out of it, and maybe you and some others don't either--readers obviously vary in their ability to visualize without a board, even at the same level, and to hold a tree of variations in short-term memory--I think that for most people a rapid traversal is not as useful as a slow one. And while for someone like your friend doing them in a suboptimal way undoubtedly  really is better than not doing them at all, I still don't think it's a positive development for someone with Aagard's deserved influence or authority to encourage the general public to do them in a way that's not the best.



Your comments were not harsh in any way.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gerry1970
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 480
Joined: 02/01/06
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #43 - 03/06/17 at 21:20:56
Post Tools
Some interesting comments on here as always.

I was surprised, like Rene, by Aagaard's recommendation/challenge given the great books they have produced and his belief in the power of hard work (he mentions "brain damage material" in a recent blog comment).

Nevertheless it looks like it got people excited and maybe now they will try the books. For me, any blog/post on the topic helps to keep my motivation. I need something as we all have a full and busy life. So I liked Jonathan's idea of a blog post with ongoing comments about progress for the Yusupov series.


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ReneDescartes
God Member
*****
Offline


Qu'est-ce donc que je
suis? Une chose qui pense.

Posts: 856
Joined: 05/18/10
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #42 - 03/06/17 at 16:56:14
Post Tools
Paul Brondal wrote on 03/02/17 at 07:02:59:
ReneDescartes, in general I really enjoy reading your comments which are eloquent and full of insight. I also  understand your point about the challenge. However, here I find you are a bit harsh. Sure, Aagaard's suggestions for reading the books are at a much faster pace than Yusupov's recommendations as you write. On the other hand, even though Yusupov's books are superb, it doesn't mean that you have to use the books exactly as he points out. In Saddler's review of a Yusupov book, it is clear that he doesn't follow the recommendations but still gives the books a high grade.

Over the past few years, I have teased a chess friend about him having all of Yusupov's books but never reading them. The challenge was an incentive for him to start reading them. He wrote me that I have given him such a bad conscience but seeing the post on QC was what could seriously make him try the challenge.

I find Aagaard a very nice and helpful guy and I have a high regard about his person. When you see what is offered on the market with over-priced videos, low-quality chess books and so on, I don't see a problem here Smiley

Honestly, very inventive harsh expressions often occur to me, but I try to exercise restraint because I think that what is negative is usually vain in every sense of the word.

This is just a post in a chess forum, but I have noticed that, even in very great works, what is ultimately negative--for example, masterful sarcasm by Voltaire against the church--is eventually forgotten, while what  is of positive inherent interest, though it might be, for example, tragic, is remembered. But these matters are both subtle and complicated. I very much respect Oscar Wilde, for example. Anyway, I aspire to take care on this point whenever I write or speak.

I retract the first two paragraphs of the quoted post--the "Super Yusupov Challenge" and the reference to not upholding professed standards. I would be glad to ask a mod to delete it if other posters would agree to take it out of their quotes.

On the other hand, I stand by the last paragraph, which is not exaggerated with too-clever writing. Aagard is a tough-talking teacher of integrity--that's no act--as well as a businessman. Though clearly a super-GM talent like Sadler hardly needs to do the material the suggested way to get maximum benefit out of it, and maybe you and some others don't either--readers obviously vary in their ability to visualize without a board, even at the same level, and to hold a tree of variations in short-term memory--I think that for most people a rapid traversal is not as useful as a slow one. And while for someone like your friend doing them in a suboptimal way undoubtedly  really is better than not doing them at all, I still don't think it's a positive development for someone with Aagard's deserved influence or authority to encourage the general public to do them in a way that's not the best.
« Last Edit: 03/06/17 at 20:25:19 by ReneDescartes »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JonathanB
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 430
Location: London
Joined: 11/17/07
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #41 - 03/06/17 at 12:46:54
Post Tools
JonathanB wrote on 01/27/17 at 13:02:25:
Serious question:

Are there any documented cases of someone working their way through the lot. Fom page 1 of book 1 to the last page of book 9
.




The quality chess blog has found 76 such people.

http://www.qualitychess.co.uk/blog/5905

  

www.streathambrixtonchess.blogspot.com  "I don't call you f**k face" - GM Nigel Short.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 79
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #40 - 03/06/17 at 09:02:56
Post Tools
I was so inspired by the Yusupov Challenge, so that I decided to make an alternative Challenge: The Grandmaster Preparation Challenge. Have already tried these books earlier on but they were on the tough side. Did the first 39 exercises in Calculation in the chapter Candidate Moves and the results are really good now. Use about 4 minutes per exercise with a score of 70%!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 79
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: Yusupov’s 9 Book Series
Reply #39 - 03/02/17 at 07:02:59
Post Tools
ReneDescartes, in general I really enjoy reading your comments which are eloquent and full of insight. I also  understand your point about the challenge. However, here I find you are a bit harsh. Sure, Aagaard's suggestions for reading the books are at a much faster pace than Yusupov's recommendations as you write. On the other hand, even though Yusupov's books are superb, it doesn't mean that you have to use the books exactly as he points out. In Saddler's review of a Yusupov book, it is clear that he doesn't follow the recommendations but still gives the books a high grade.

Over the past few years, I have teased a chess friend about him having all of Yusupov's books but never reading them. The challenge was an incentive for him to start reading them. He wrote me that I have given him such a bad conscience but seeing the post on QC was what could seriously make him try the challenge.

I find Aagaard a very nice and helpful guy and I have a high regard about his person. When you see what is offered on the market with over-priced videos, low-quality chess books and so on, I don't see a problem here Smiley
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo