Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis (Read 20008 times)
ReneDescartes
God Member
*****
Offline


Qu'est-ce donc que je
suis? Une chose qui pense.

Posts: 911
Joined: 05/18/10
Gender: Male
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #20 - 09/30/17 at 17:15:52
Post Tools
It was available on Amazon from a third-party seller yesterday. But there were only two left! I think this book will be very popular.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
phonological_loop
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 22
Joined: 09/10/17
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #19 - 09/30/17 at 16:10:20
Post Tools
Where do you see that, grandpatzer? It strangely appears as "Out of print" on Amazon.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
grandpatzer
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 166
Joined: 04/29/16
Gender: Male
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #18 - 09/26/17 at 19:46:44
Post Tools
I see that the book is now available.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
exigentsky
Senior Member
****
Offline


Q

Posts: 400
Joined: 05/14/07
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #17 - 07/13/17 at 22:19:00
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 06/09/17 at 10:17:00:
Hello wolfsblut,

Yes, both the KIA and English have been included and the KIA is an update to the line we were offering in the PTF book.

The book is at the editing phase now. I think that we need at least 5-6 weeks before the book becomes a real thing sitting on the selves, but to be honest this is just a personal estimation and in reality i have no clue!


If I'm not misunderstanding, then isn't this a complete answer to Flank openings (barring really eccentric options like 1. b3 or 1. b4). You're basically saying that the book covers 1. c4, 1. Nf3 and 1. d4 in one tome. If that's true, I think it's well worth advertising. One of the problems with my repertoire is exactly the move orders from the flank openings (I play mostly QID and NID). For instance  1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4 4.Qc2 O-O is a bit awkward because it looks a lot like a traditional 1. d4 line yet plays VERY differently due to the lack of central tension. I think it's also probably a tiny bit worse for Black than the true Nimzo.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wolfsblut
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 109
Joined: 06/02/06
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #16 - 06/09/17 at 13:44:34
Post Tools
That is really nice!
Thank you for your answer.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1423
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #15 - 06/09/17 at 10:17:00
Post Tools
Hello wolfsblut,

Yes, both the KIA and English have been included and the KIA is an update to the line we were offering in the PTF book.

The book is at the editing phase now. I think that we need at least 5-6 weeks before the book becomes a real thing sitting on the selves, but to be honest this is just a personal estimation and in reality i have no clue!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wolfsblut
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 109
Joined: 06/02/06
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #14 - 06/07/17 at 19:18:37
Post Tools
Hi Nikos,
in the past you were thinking about writing some new stuff about the Kings Indian Attack (1.Nf3 d5 2. g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 e6 and probably also about 1.c4 e6 2.e4 in your forthcoming book. How was your decision? Pointing to your former book about the French or including it in your new book?
Looking forward to your book!
P.S. Is there a chance to get knowing when the book is about to appear?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CanadianClub
Senior Member
****
Offline


Greetings from Catalonia!

Posts: 328
Joined: 11/11/12
Gender: Male
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #13 - 04/21/17 at 19:17:29
Post Tools
I totally agree. I have Nikos's book on the French and I think it is the best repertoire book I own. And I play only his Nd2 rep choice. The book is both inspirational and instructive.

I play the nimzo as Black and QG vs 3.Nf3 (both Ragozin and QGD) so I am expecting he would give us a new a good weapon (again). Very important is a good system in the London/Jobava attack/Colle for practical reasons (everybody plays this way nowadays).

Thx
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Online


USCF National Master

Posts: 2356
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #12 - 04/21/17 at 18:51:05
Post Tools
Also, I'd like to point out that it's too much to expect (as readers) to like all of the variations chosen in a repertoire book.  I'm happy if a book has interesting ideas that stimulate me generally, and if I can use at least 25% or so of the recommended lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10204
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #11 - 04/20/17 at 13:32:01
Post Tools
While I intuitively prefer the Tartakower to classical Nbd7 variations my loyalty is far from absolute. I already have the books of Sadler and Cox, which are sufficient if White is willing to do some work him/herself. So for me neglecting the Tartakower is a plus. At the other hand I'm skeptical of those ...Nbd7 variations, but given the quality of the Tarrasch book I'm willing to change. Indeed this

"a more "risky"/play-for-the-win alternative"
probably will be decisive, as your Tarrasch book was somewhat lacking in this respect imo. Not that I blame you for it - it just made me decide not to play this opening, which of course totally is my own responsibility.
Researching ...b6 against 5.Bf4 may be a very good reason to buy your new book though. There are some very interesting, very sharp and very promising gambit lines for Black.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Online


USCF National Master

Posts: 2356
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #10 - 04/20/17 at 04:34:00
Post Tools
Thanks for the response, I'm really looking forward to your book!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1423
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #9 - 04/18/17 at 20:37:04
Post Tools
Hello,

First of all, i recommend a more "risky"/play-for-the-win alternative in the Bg5 lines with h6-Nbd7 and ...c5, with ...c6 and ...a6 as has been played by Aronian. The main line of this system, according to my analysis, seems to be a very unclear position with chances for both sides.  Although, in my experience, the solid ...c5 plan at club level suffices to play for the win as well. I have inserted in the relevant chapter some of my own games at club level play where i obtained slightly better and safe positions after the opening. Also, it is absolutely stunning hiw Kramnik is playing this line for the win, and these instructive examples from his own praxis are also analysed in this chapter.

There will also be chapters for all the sidelines and a chapter against London/Colle/Torre based on the way the great Taimanov used to meet these systems. A system that has become fashionable lately. There is plenty of new analysis there. The idea is to reduce the number of "exact theory" and try to reach some typical positions.

Also, there is going to be plenty of material on typical IQP, Haning Pawns, Rubinstein-stryctyre, 2QPI- structure and plenty of "general instruction" material complementing the material.

For a small taste about the hanging pawns, you can see this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd6ZReM4u1g
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Online


USCF National Master

Posts: 2356
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #8 - 04/18/17 at 19:45:26
Post Tools
In an opening like this (the ...Nbd7 QGD), since there isn't a ton of theory it would be nice to have another option covered as well--Lasker's Defense, Tartakower's, etc.  But considering that the Catalan is also covered, I understand that there might not be much space. 

But in general I think that playing an opening like the QGD is best seen as playing a family of openings, and it's nice to be able to mix and match subvariations to taste.  Of course I don't know what lines are being covered, but 1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 d5 4.d4 Be7 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 0-0 7.Rc1 Nbd7 8.e3 c5 9.cxd5 Nxd5 10.Bxe7 Nxe7 11.Be2 b6 12.dxc5 Nxc5 13.b4 Qxd1+ 14.Rxd1 Nd7 as in one recent Kramnik game is not the most exciting stuff!

But I'm looking forward to seeing it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4299
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #7 - 04/18/17 at 19:10:44
Post Tools
One might think there isn't much room for risky play in that line 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 d5 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 h6 6. Bh4 Nbd7 7. Rc1 O-O 8. Nf3 c5 (by whatever move order) ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PatzerKing
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 57
Joined: 08/05/09
Re: Playing 1.d4 d5 A Classical Repertoire, Ntirlis
Reply #6 - 04/18/17 at 17:15:32
Post Tools
Hi Nikos,

I am playing the KID/Modern/Pirc and have good results but people are preparing for my KID although they are a 1.e4 player. So I am thinking about a solid backup repertoire based on the NID. Against 1.Nf3 I would play 1…d5 and against the move order 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 I would play 3…d5 so I cannot get move-ordered. So the big question for me is if you cover 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Sf3 and give some explanation what are the pros/cons of 3.Nc3/3.Nf3, because I have no idea about 1.d4 d5. Another question is if the lines are solid but dry or if they are a little bit more risky but with chances to outplay an opponent.

Thanks for answering all the questions we have.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo