Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders (Read 8025 times)
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #70 - 11/12/18 at 09:48:39
Post Tools
Part 2: 7...e5 with the critical 19...Nd4

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.Ng5 Rf8 13.Nxh7 Nxh7 14.Qxh7 Nc5 15.Qh6 a5 16.a3 Be6 17.Bxe6 Nxe6 18.Qe3 0-0-0 19.0-0 Nd4! (Diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

Black plans to go directly for f7-f5, maxmising the effect of already having a rook on f8 and hitting white at the earliest opportunity. There is now a threat to the c2 pawn so white has only two moves that make sense. I will take 20.Rac1 as mainline even though it may well be that it is more promising to go with the other rook (a move I'll cover as well). The plan behind Rfc1 would be to keep the a1 rook on a1 with the hope of giving extra punch to an eventual a4.
20.Rac1

20.Rfc1 f5 21.exf5 gxf5 22.Ne2 f4 23.Qh3+
23.Qe4 Nxe2+ 24.Qxe2 f3 25.Qe4 Qf6 26.Rd1 fxg2 27.Rxd8+ Rxd8 (+/ = ) to (=) For what it's worth white looks a little bit better, although making progress does not look given.
23...Ne6
23...Qe6?! 24.Qxe6+ Nxe6 25.Rd1 Kc7 (+/ = ) It's not going to be easy to convert but white looks a little better here with no queens on and a clear extra pawn.
24.Rd1 Rde8! (Diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

Black's piece arrangement looks mildly weird now but ok... The idea should be something like that by setting up compactly black gets chances to decide when and how he starts attacking white's kingside. White now has quite many attempts but most look possible to defuse for black. If black wanted to force play he could have tried:
24...f3 25.Nc3 Rxd1+ 26.Rxd1 fxg2 27.Ne4 Kb8 (+/ = ) Which looks less solid to me. Crucially though, it looks to give white to well placed pieces for black to be able to aspire for equality.

25.c4

25.a4 b4 26.Nc1 e4 27.Nb3 f3 28.g3 e3 29.fxe3 Qg5 30.Rd2 Qxe3+ (=) With counterplay.
25.Qf3 Kb7 26.b4 axb4 27.a4; 27.axb4 Qxb4 (∞) I can't see a way through for white.; 27...e4 28.Qxe4 Nc7! 29.Qxe7 Rxe7 30.Nc1 c5 31.Nd3 Kc6 (∞) Black's activity compensates the pawn deficit.
25.Nc3 Kb8 26.a4 Nd4 27.axb5 Rh8 28.Qd3 Qh4 29.h3 Reg8 (∞) Is counterplay.
25...f3 26.Ng3 Kb8 27.cxb5 cxb5 28.Rd5 Nd4 29.Qh6
29.Rc1 Qg7; 29...Rd8!? 30.Rxd8+ Qxd8 31.Qh6 Rf7 32.gxf3 Nxf3+ 33.Kh1 Qd5 34.Qb6+ Rb7 35.Qc6 Rh7 36.Nf1 Qxc6 37.Rxc6 Kb7 38.Rc1 Kb6 39.Kg2 e4 (=) to (+/ = ) Black should be able to hold.; 30.Rcc5 Rd8 31.Rxd4; 31.Rxb5+ Nxb5 32.Rxb5+ Kc7 33.gxf3 Qf7 34.Rc5+ Kb6 35.Rc3 Rh8 36.Qg4 Rd1+ 37.Kg2 Rd4 38.Qf5 Qxf5 39.Nxf5 Rg8+ 40.Ng3 (=) I Don't see how any side can win with accurate play.; 31...Rxd4 32.Rxb5+ Kc7 33.gxf3 Qf7 34.Rc5+ Kb8 35.Rc3 e4 36.Qf1 Qd7 37.Qe2 Rd1+ 38.Kg2 exf3+ 39.Rxf3 Rxf3 40.Qxf3 Rd4!? (=) Black should not be worse objectively.
29...Rf6 30.Qe3!? Qe6 31.Rc5 fxg2 32.Rd1 Kb7 33.b4
33.a4 Qg4 34.Rxd4 Qxd4 35.Rxb5+ Kc7 36.Qc1+ Rc6 37.Qg5 Rb6 38.Rxa5 Rxb2 (∞)
33.Ne4 Qg4 34.Rxd4 exd4 35.Rxb5+ Ka6 36.Rxa5+ Kxa5 37.Qd2+ Ka6 38.Qd3+ Kb7 39.Qb5+ Ka7 40.Qxe8 Qd1+ 41.Kxg2 Qf3+ 42.Kf1 Qd1+ 43.Kg2 Qf3+ 44.Kf1 Qd1+ 45.Kg2 (=)
33...Ka6 34.Qe4 Qa2 35.Nf5 Qe2 36.Qxe2 Nxe2+ 37.Kxg2 Nf4+ 38.Kf1 Rxf5 (=) Is not worse for black even if white's rooks will get active.

20.Rac1 f5 21.exf5
21.f3 Rf6 22.Nd1 f4 23.Qe1 Qc5 24.Nf2 a4 25.Nd3 Nxf3+ 26.Kh1 Rxd3 27.cxd3 Nxe1 28.Rxc5 Nxd3 29.Rc2 c5 (=) The strong knight should offer compensation.
21.Ne2 f4 22.Qh3+ Qd7 23.Qd3 f3 24.Nxd4 Qg4 25.Nxf3 Rxd3 26.Nxe5 Qxe4 27.Nxd3 Qd4 (∞) I am not sure how to assess this.
21...gxf5 22.Ne2 f4 23.Qh3+
23.Qe4 Nxe2+ 24.Qxe2 f3 25.Qe3
25.Qe4 Kb7 (=) Black's control over the lines combined with his f3 pawn being highly useful means he seems to have compensation.
25...Qh4 26.Qb6 Rf6 (=) Perpetual check seems a likely outcome.
23...Ne6
23...Kb7 24.Nxd4 Rxd4 (+/ = ) Black has not gotten in f3.
23...Qe6 24.Qxe6+ Nxe6 25.f3 Seems (+/ = ) - esque
24.Rcd1
24.Rfd1 f3 25.Nc3 Rde8 26.a4 fxg2 27.Ne4 Kb8 28.Qc3 Nd4 29.Qxa5 Qc7 30.Qxc7+ Kxc7 31.Kxg2 Rf4 32.Nc5 Rg8+ 33.Kf1 Rfg4 34.Ke1 Rf4 35.axb5 Rg1+ 36.Kd2 Rxf2+ 37.Kd3 Rxd1+ 38.Rxd1 Rxh2 39.c3 Nxb5 (=) Black is OK.
24...f3 25.Nc1
25.Nc3!? Rde8! 26.Rfe1 Kb8 27.Qg4 Qf7 28.g3 Rg8 29.Qe4 Nd4 30.Re3
30.h4 Qh5 31.Kh2 Rg4 32.Rxd4 Rxe4 33.Rdxe4 (∞)
30...Qh5 31.Rxd4 exd4 32.Qxd4 Rxe3 33.Qb6+ Ka8 34.Qxc6+ Kb8 35.fxe3 f2+ 36.Kf1 Qh3+ 37.Qg2 Qh6 (Diagram) (∞) Both sides have dangerous play

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

25...fxg2
25...Rde8 26.Rfe1
26.g3 Qg7 27.Rfe1 Kc7 28.Qf1 Nf4 29.Nd3 Ne2+ 30.Rxe2 fxe2 31.Qxe2 e4 32.Nc5 e3 (∞) With play for black.
26...Qf6 27.Nd3 Rh8 28.Qxf3 Qxf3 29.gxf3 Nd4 30.Re3 Nxc2 31.Rxe5 Reg8+ 32.Kh1 Rh3 33.Re4 Rgh8 34.Kg1 Rxh2 35.Rd2 Na1 36.Nc5 Rh1+ 37.Kg2 Rc1 38.Ne6 Nb3 39.Rd6 Rhh1 40.Rxc6+ Rxc6 41.Kxh1 Rc2 42.Kg2 (+/ = ) It's hard to say if white will win but he seems better.
26.Rxd8+ Kxd8 27.Rd1+ Kc7 28.Qe3 Qc5 29.Nd3
21.Qxc5!? is similar but the pawn is kept on f2.
29...Qxe3 30.fxe3 (+=)
White is a little better since he will soon be a pawn up. This is not the end of the story though as there will be a considerable technical task.

Analysis file will be found in later post.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #69 - 11/12/18 at 08:18:50
Post Tools
Hello.

RdC wrote on 11/10/18 at 23:33:21:
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 11/10/18 at 21:50:14:
4.Bf4 analysis part 1: Apparently solvent play (7...e5)


6.Bh6!?


There's going to be a lot of games with this because it can arise from positions where White has played Be3 or Bg5

Yer. As long as black allows 6.Bh6 it seems like a useful move for a decent amount of people.

Even for London-system players in fact; which in itself means it's useful to almost everybody out there.

Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10268
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #68 - 11/11/18 at 16:07:20
Post Tools
12.O-O iso 12.Ng5 in the main line is what attracts attacking players like me.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 778
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #67 - 11/10/18 at 23:33:21
Post Tools
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 11/10/18 at 21:50:14:
4.Bf4 analysis part 1: Apparently solvent play (7...e5)


6.Bh6!?


There's going to be a lot of games with this because it can arise from positions where White has played Be3 or Bg5
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #66 - 11/10/18 at 21:50:14
Post Tools
4.Bf4 analysis part 1: Apparently solvent play (7...e5)

(A) 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7
By far the main move. Also very natural if white can't (probably somewhere in the early middlegame) draw benefit from black having put the bishop where it can be threatened by Bh6. In practice White players have mostly gone 5.Nf3 now. It puts a negligible amount of direct pressure on black though. Since black will meet it with some developing move of his own both sides will have gotten a move to improve their position. Relatively speaking this probably benefits black slightly as he is the one who needs to get his position in order more acutely than white. Had the knight move opened up new avenues to put positional pressure on black the picture could have been nicer for white, although it does not appear to do that to a great extent.

Castling for black seems alright e.g. 5.Nf3 0-0 planning 6.Qd2 c5. From what I can tell black can also try 5...Nc6 as long as he is aware of the following sequence; where white essentially does not get anywhere:
5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Qd2 Bg4 7.d5 Bxf3 8.dxc6 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nxe4 10.Qb4 Nc5 11.cxb7 Rb8 12.Bb5+ Kf8 13.Bc6 Nxb7 14.Bxb7 c6! (Diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

Instead of the knight move...
5.Qd2!
Appears more dangerous. White's plan is to retain more flexibility and disturb black with Bh6 early. Black has:

A1) 5...c6
A2) 5...0-0

Others:
5...Nc6 will be covered in another move order.
5...a6?! 6.Bh6 0-0 (6...Bxh6 7.Qxh6 Nc6 8.0-0-0 += ) 7.0-0-0 Nc6 (7...b5 8.f3 += Is just more comfortable for white) 8.h4 Bxh6 9.Qxh6 e5 10.d5 Nd4 11.h5! (+=) With positional pressure
5...Nbd7?! 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 += With no immediate disaster for black, though also a somewhat prospectless position
5...b6? 6.Bh6 0-0 7.h4! (+/-) When black has played a sub-optimal move like b6 the pawn thrust seems effective.

(A1) 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6!?
A versatile move in the Pirc. Black prepares b5 in order to possibly seize space and disturb white's important c3 knight. He can also sometimes decide to continue Nbd7 and e5, a bit depending on what white does. Other positive effects of the move is that the queen gets squares on a5, b6 or c7 and that should e4-e5 come from white black can now often go Nf6-d5 and this is generally a good square.
6.Bh6!?
Other moves have been tried e.g. 6.Nf3 and 6.0-0-0. They keep some control but going Bh6 right away has the big advantage that castling as a reply is probably made less attractive. Black has two replies. they lead to very different types of play.
6...Bxh6
6...0-0 is quite serious. I recommend 7.0-0-0 but will cover this under a 5.0-0 move order later. Instead capturing is the only move apart from castling and also recommended by some sources.
7.Qxh6
Black now has to decide how to pursue both development and own play. There two serious choices that lead to different types of positions:

A1A) 7...e5
A1B) 7...Qa5

Originally I took the queen move as mainline and made a heck of a long comment about 7...e5, before continuing to give more moves after the queen move. I think now that giving these two variations separately is better. They are different and in both there is an extensive body of positions to check, meaning there is no lack of material for either move. This post will details how I think white sould play after 7...e5, while 7...Qa5 will be covered in a separate post after.

(A1A) 7...e5


This has been discussed a fair bit on chesspub. Black strikes back at d4 and hopes for simplification via dxe5 or if there is tension some undermining action with Bg4. Noteworthy is that 7...e5 appears to be the way to execute since 7...Nbd7?! looks weaker. The Bg4 resource is missing and black should not get anywhere with what little counterplay he has e.g.

7...Nbd7?! 8.Nf3 e5 9.Be2! Qe7 10.0-0 exd4!? 11.Nxd4 Ng8 12.Qf4 Ngf6 13.Rad1(+=) White looks more comfortable.

My suggestion against 7...e5 is to play the way described below. Given is only what I think are the most important lines. An analysis file will be made available with more extensive coverage:

8.Nf3 Qe7
To keep Bg4 as a possibility. 8...exd4 9.Nxd4 Qe7 10.Be2 (+/-) is good for white
9.dxe5
I also (now) see some danger for black in the following attempt:
9.Bc4!? exd4 10.Nxd4 d5 11.Be2! Nxe4 12.Nxe4 dxe4 13.0-0-0!? Nd7 14.Rhe1 Nc5 15.b4! Nd7 16.Bd3 f5 17.f3 Ne5 18.Bxe4 fxe4 When, after some exact move from black it has to be said, there is nothing obvious for white. He can always play on a bit though. Going instead 11.Bb3, which I briefly looked at and gave in a previous effort at analysing the 7...e5 lines, is just clearly weaker compared to 11.Be2. With the latter move there are dangers to navigate for black, while the former seems unimpressive. Not going for the more open positions after 9.Bc4!?, aiming instead for some pressure in the at least slightly symmetrical looking positions after pxp seems more attractive to me.
9...dxe5 10.Bc4 b5
10...Nbd7 is surprisingly resilient and is not obviously so much worse than 10...b5. I will recommend:
11.0-0
11.Ng5!? Rf8 12.Nxh7 Nxh7 13.Qxh7 Qg5 14.h4 Qf6 15.Qh6 Rh8 16.Qe3 Rxh4 17.0-0-0 Nf8 (+=) Still leaves black fairly solid but white is a little more comfortable.
11.a4 Nb6!? 12.Bb3 Be6 13. a5 ;13.Bxe6 Qxe6 14.0-0 (= to +=) ; 13...Nc4 14.0-0 0-0-0 (+= to ∞)
11...Nb6 12.Bb3 Be6 13.Rfd1 Bxb3 14.axb3 (+=) White is a little more comfortable.
11.Bb3 Nbd7 (diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

This is a major branching point. The other line is if black goes for advancing the a-pawn forward immediately. Compared to moving the knight to d7 the immediate advantage of 11...a5 is that black is a bit more active. If white meets it correctly it does also seems a bit like making multiple pawn moves on the queenside (a5 will be followed up by more) is maybe not strategically optimal though. My main line now would be either move with the a-pawn. But it took me some time to evaluate both options.

At first I thought (11...a5) 12.a4 was about equally strong compared to moving the pawn forward one step. Then I found this nice sequence and it looked like Black was fine:
12.a4 b4 13.Nb1 Nbd7 14.Nbd2
14.Ng5!? Rf8 15.Nxh7 Nxh7 16.Qxh7 Qg5!? 17.Nd2 Nf6 18.Qg7 Ke7 19.h4 Qxg2 20.O-O-O Qg4 21.h5 gxh5 22.Qh6 Qf4 23.Qxf4 exf4 May be a small += but black's somewhat ugly position shouldn't be so bad.
14...Ba6 15.Ng5 Rf8 16.Nxh7 Nxh7 17.Qxh7 Qg5!
17...0-0-0 18.Qh3 Kc7 19.0-0-0 Nc5 20.Qe3 Rd4 21.Ba2 f5!? 22.exf5 gxf5 (∞ to +=) Seems like the alternative, but white could maybe find some exact way forward here. Instead after the queen move.
18.Qh3 Nc5 19.0-0-0 Rd8! 20.Qg3 Nxb3! 21.cxb3 Qxg3 22.hxg3 Ke7 (= to +=) I think black has good holding chances.

An addition to this though is that for a while I likely underestimated the continuation below. It looked like it needlessly dropped a central pawn. This is not really so bad though and white should have serious chances for advantage:

12.a4 b4 13.Nb1 Nbd7 14.Nbd2 Ba6 15.Bc4! Bxc4 16.Nxc4 Qc5
16...Nxe4? 17.O-O-O Nxf2 18.Rxd7 Qxd7 19.Re1 Qe6 20.Nfxe5 Rd8 21.Qg7 Rf8 22.Qxh7 (+/ - ) Despite having netted a central pawn earlier it does not seem like black has been successful in defusing white's pressure.
17.Nfd2 Qxf2+ 18.Kxf2 Ng4+ 19.Ke2 Nxh6 20.Nb3 Ke7 21.Nbxa5 Ra6 22.Nb3 (+/ = ) It looks hard to organise the black position. White seems fairly easily better.

I was also always pleased with the more modest 12.a3 and would perhaps slightly prefer it anyway:
11...a5!? 12.a3! Ba6 13.Ng5 Rf8 14.Nxh7 Nxh7 15.Qxh7 a4 16.Ba2 b4 17.axb4 Qxb4 18.Qh3 (+=) And things seem good for white. Black's counterplay isn't so threatening.

12.Ng5 Rf8 13.Nxh7 Nxh7 14.Qxh7 Nc5 15.Qh6
Somewhat surprisingly considering black pretty much having played a passive setup I don't think white has much leeway to experiment. If he wants an advantage I would recommend playing exactly these last couple of moves. For alternatives see the analysis file.
15...a5 16.a3 Be6!
Critical. The weakening of support for the b3 bishop means white almost has to exchange on e6 and then, even if black is still a pawn down, he at least has a very good knight. Taking the bishop directly does not work so well with the queen ready to come back e.g.
16...Nxb3?! 17.cxb3 Be6 18.Qe3 f6 19.Qb6 Rc8 20.Qxa5!? Kf7 21.Qb6 Bxb3 22.O-O Rfd8 23.Qe3 (+/ = )
There is also:
16...Ba6 17.Rd1 Nxb3
17...Rd8 18.Qe3 Rxd1+ 19.Kxd1 Rh8 20.Ba2 Bc8 21.Kc1 Kf8 22.Nb1 Kg7 23.Nd2 (+/ = )
17...b4 18.axb4 axb4 19.Ba4 Nxa4 20.Nxa4 Bb5 21.b3 Rg8 22.g3 (+/ = )
18.cxb3 b4 19.axb4 axb4 20.Na4 Bb5 21.Nb6 Rd8 22.Qe3 Rxd1+ 23.Kxd1 Rh8 24.Kc2 Qf8 25.h3 (+/ = ) White is somewhat better.
17.Bxe6 Nxe6 18.Qe3 0-0-0
18...Nd4!? 19.Rc1 0-0-0 20.Ne2!? Qc5 21.Nxd4 Qxd4 22.0-0 Kc7 23.Qe1!? (+=) Seems better for white.
19.0-0!? (Diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

White has a serious alternative to castling that perhaps is even a bit more simple to play and understand. It also leads to pawn up positions although ones where I think there should not necessarily be good chances to make something out of this. Here are some lines:

19.Qb6!? Qc7 20.Qxc7+ Kxc7 21.Rd1
Probably best. I could not find anything special in other continuations e.g.
21.f3 Nf4 22.Rg1 Rh8 23.h3 f5! 24.Rd1 b4! 25.axb4 axb4 26.Rxd8 Rxd8 27.Ne2 fxe4 28.fxe4 b3 29.Nxf4 exf4 30.Ke2 bxc2 31.Rc1 Rb8 32.Rxc2 Rb3 (=) Black should have enough compensation because of his active rook.
21.Ne2 Nd4 22.Rc1 Rd6 23.Ng3 b4 24.h4 Rfd8 25.Nf1 b3 26.cxb3 Nxb3 27.Rb1 Nc5 28.Ne3 Nxe4 29.h5 gxh5 30.Rxh5 Nc5 31.Kf1 Nd3 32.Rf5 f6 (=) Black is OK.
21...b4 22.axb4 axb4 23.Ne2 b3
23...Nc5!? 24.f3 b3 25.Rd2 bxc2 26.Nc1 Ne6 27.Rxc2 Rd4!? (=) to (+/ = ) This seems to be a safe pawn up kind of position for white. At the same time making use of this extra asset is highly problematic and black has very good pieces. I think black should hold.
24.Rd2 Ra8 25.cxb3 Nc5 26.O-O Nxe4!? (=) to (+/ = ) Black is just marginally worse. (Diagram)

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


19...Nd4!
Now is the correct time for this move. Black gets chances to hold the position thanks to general activity and possibilities to make pawn advances against white's still not amazingly developed position. Analysis of this will follow in the next post (character limit nearing).

There are less good alternatives also e.g.
19...Rd6 20.Rad1 Rfd8 21.Rxd6 Qxd6 22.h3 Nd4 23.Rc1 Kb7 24.Kh2 f5!? 25.exf5!? gxf5 26.Ne2 (+=)
There are probabbly some difficulties remaining for black -pawn down but with reasonable activity to navigate.

More to follow soon. Enjoy!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #65 - 11/10/18 at 21:42:49
Post Tools
Hi.

Okay. So I will make an effort with 4.Bf4 analysis in the coming week. There was some match or something that made me take out a couple of vacation days anyway. Since last post I have quietly looked again at our favourite 7...e5 continuation and checked some (hopefully promising) paths against black castling on move five or six. Now what is going to happen is I will start posting stuff; although for reasons of pure evil I think I will do it piece by piece in some manner. So expect a post of content once every few days at best. Having already thought a bit about structure as well and this is probably how everything will be presented:

Post 1: The apparently solvent 7...e5 (excluding 19...Nd4)

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5

Post 2: The critical 7...e5 with 19...Nd4
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.Ng5 Rf8 13.Nxh7 Nxh7 14.Qxh7 Nc5 15.Qh6 a5 16.a3 Be6 17.Bxe6 Nxe6 18.Qe3 0-0-0 19.0-0 Nd4!

Post 3: The mainline that got castled in to 7...Qa5 with 10.0-0-0
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 Qa5 8.Bd3 c5 9.d5 Nbd7 10.0-0-0

Post 4: Castling - when our opponent does it we hope it's less good
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 0-0 6.0-0-0 c6 7.Bh6
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 0-0


Post 5: Compact c6 play
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 c6

Post 6: Keeping creative types in check - 4..Nc6 and others
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Nc6 (4...Nbd7, 4...a6, 4...e6, 4...Na6)

Feel free to comment and as always have a nice evening!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
an ordinary chessplayer
Senior Member
****
Offline


I used to be not bad.

Posts: 315
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)
Joined: 01/02/15
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #64 - 10/21/18 at 23:43:48
Post Tools
I played over Confused_by_Theory's analysis from #61, see the attachment.
  

chesspub-1517943784-61.pgn ( 1 KB | 20 Downloads )
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #63 - 10/20/18 at 20:23:12
Post Tools
Hi.

MNb wrote on 10/20/18 at 15:36:00:
As we Dutch say: what's in a good barrel won't grow sour.

Well. I can only thank the people of the low countries for their wisdom and you for conveying it.

MNb wrote on 10/20/18 at 15:36:00:
White also can try to transpose to Kasparov-Radjabov, Moscow 2002 with 10.h3 (iso 10.Bc4) Nbd7 11.O-O-O a6 12.Bc4 etc. Critical is 11...b5 12.Bxb5 cxb5 13.Nxb5 Qc5 14.Nd6+ Ke7 and according to my analysis White has a forced draw at best.

As I recall a draw was the best I could find as well.

MNb wrote on 10/20/18 at 15:36:00:
But I'll happily repeat 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g4 4.Be3/Bf4/Bg5 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.O-O Nc5 13.Rfe1 and Black's problem of Ke8 is not solved yet. It may not be much, but I insist that it's something.

I haven't really checked this much since I posted a large file in the 4...Bg5 megathread. I'll repost a portion of that here.

Black needs to know what he is doing. In terms of trade-offs between the continuations. With 12.0-0 instead of 12.Ng5 white won't win a pawn. Part of why I think this is has to do with that going back to pawn-winning play with 13.Ng5 does not seem to lead anywhere special. Instead he gets somewhat faster development.



Have a nice night.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10268
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #62 - 10/20/18 at 15:36:00
Post Tools
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 10/20/18 at 00:38:20:
Apologies for not having a predictable posting pattern.

As we Dutch say: what's in a good barrel won't grow sour.
But I'll happily repeat 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g4 4.Be3/Bf4/Bg5 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.O-O Nc5 13.Rfe1 and Black's problem of Ke8 is not solved yet. It may not be much, but I insist that it's something.
White also can try to transpose to Kasparov-Radjabov, Moscow 2002 with 10.h3 (iso 10.Bc4) Nbd7 11.O-O-O a6 12.Bc4 etc. Critical is 11...b5 12.Bxb5 cxb5 13.Nxb5 Qc5 14.Nd6+ Ke7 and according to my analysis White has a forced draw at best.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #61 - 10/20/18 at 00:38:20
Post Tools
Hi.

Apologies for not having a predictable posting pattern. Instead of continuing posting about more lines it seems, however upsetting, there might be a case for making a correction in the small subset of stuff I have already posted something about. In the 7...e5 Pirc variation I realised that in reply #51 I gave nothing against:

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.Ng5 Rf8 13.Nxh7 Nxh7 14.Qxh7 Nc5 15.Qh6 a5 16.a3 Be6 17.Bxe6 Nxe6 18.Qe3 0-0-0 19.0-0 Nd4

That was bad Tongue. Both because we discussed it at some point and also because it looks like the best move. Anyway. After rechecking and going a bit deeper I am not sure I was correct in my conclusion from when last this was discussed - that white (with work) should be better after 22.Ne2 (in the line with 20.Rac1 below). Essentially as you continue down the lines, white often has trouble meaningfully consolidating. Disclaimer-wise this is by no means easy stuff though and there is a fair bit of endgame evaluation attached. Quite plausibly more diligent analysis could provide some kind of way for white. Or if not that then maybe some deep computer analysis at some point could yield results somewhere. I will drop an analysis file at some point (probably when I have checked every line after 4...Bg7 5.Qd2). Until then here is some textual points.

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7
I now think this is most exact. If 11...a5 I think after 12.a3 there does not need to be a difference between the moves. The downside instead is that 12.a4 seems stronger after 11...a5 compared to 11...Nbd7.
12.Ng5
I could not make 12.0-0 work as a threatening move. After 12...Nc5 white would have to a) find something other than 13.Ng5 or b) Go 13.Ng5 although then I think having castled is not necessarily optimal.
12...Rf8 13.Nxh7 Nxh7 14.Qxh7 Nc5 15.Qh6
Extracting the queen looks like the only threatening move to me. Short castling is again some sort of an alternative though. A point is that if black goes a5 now, a3 becomes a very viable reply pretty much because of the fact that the queen is ready to jump back into the action quickly.
15...a5 16.a3 Be6
This seems best. For structural reasons white will have to take when black gets to reroute his knight to a more promising square.
17.Bxe6 Nxe6 18.Qe3
White has some half alternatives but backing the queen directly to the most natural square seems like the only threatening way to play. 18.0-0 is met by 18...0-0-0 when 19.Qe3 should be best and there would be a transposition.
18...0-0-0 19.0-0
19.Qb6 should invite a queen exchange after 19...Qc7 but then is white really that much better?
19...Nd4
This move seems like it invites Ne2 at the right moment. Then the knights gets exchanged and white's task is presumably somewhat simplified. There are some redeeming factors in black's position, sure, but are they enough? I did not think so at first although after some analysis I can't really say I made any progress as white.
20.Rac1
One of the (far from only) lines after the less natural looking but interesting 20.Rfc1!? was:
20. Rfc1 f5 21.exf5 gxf5 22.Ne2 f4 23.Qh3+ Ne6! 24.Rd1 Rde8! 25.Qf3!? Kb7 26.b4 axb4 27.a4 e4 28.Qxe4 Nc7! 29.Qxe7 Rxe7 30.Nc1 c5 31.Nd3 Kc6 (Diagram) (∞) The pawn deficit seems not such a major factor and black should hold.

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


20...f5 21.exf5
Seing this pawn get rammed down all the way to g2 in some later continuations makes one consider other moves; although black can then often bypass with f5-f4 and it's probably not so easy for white:
21.f3 Rf6 22.Nd1 f4 23.Qe1 Qc5 24.Nf2 a4 25.Nd3 Nxf3+ 26.Kh1 Rxd3 27.cxd3 Nxe1 28.Rxc5 Nxd3 29.Rc2 c5 (=) The strong knight should offer compensation.
21.Ne2 f4 22.Qh3+ Qd7 23.Qd3 f3 24.Nxd4 Qg4 25.Nxf3 Rxd3 26.Nxe5 Qxe4 27.Nxd3 Qd4 (∞) I am not sure how to assess this.

21...gxf5 22.Ne2 f4 23.Qh3+ Ne6 24.Rcd1 f3 25.Nc1
An alternative that I am not sure about the slightest (both sides seems to get play) is the other knight move; when play might continue:
25.Nc3 Rde8! 26.Rfe1 Kb8 27.Qg4 Qf7 28.g3 Rg8 29.Qe4 Nd4 30.Re3 Qh5 31.Rxd4 exd4 32.Qxd4 Rxe3 33.Qb6+ Ka8 34.Qxc6+ Kb8 35.fxe3 f2+ 36.Kf1 Qh3+ 37.Qg2 Qh6 (Diagram) (∞) Both sides have dangerous play to my eyes.

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


25...fxg2!?
Now as far as I can tell white is getting into some pawn up endgames that may or not be hard to win. There are so many positions to check so I can't say if black can find something safe and easy or if he has to suffer. One of the lines I checked (and again it is not so easy at many points to say what the best move is so don't take this as best play by any means) was the following:
26.Rxd8+ Kxd8 27.Rd1+ Kc7 28.Qe3 Qc5 29.Nd3 Qxe3 30.fxe3 Rd8 31.Nf2 31...Rg8 32.Ne4 Ng5 33.Nxg5 Rxg5 34.Rd2 Rg4 35.Rxg2 Re4 36.Kf2 Kd6 37.Kf3 Rh4 38.Kg3 Re4 39.Re2 Ke6
(Diagram) (=) to (+/ = ) Making progress could be difficult.

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *



Anyone have any better (or worse! Smiley) ideas or refinements I am all ears.
Have a nice night.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4355
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #60 - 10/06/18 at 17:20:03
Post Tools
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 10/06/18 at 12:01:54:
Which CBM issue would this be btw? (just to make sure, because I'll buy it) 186?


Yes.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #59 - 10/06/18 at 12:01:54
Post Tools
Hi.

Have been quite busy and consequently got some problems posting more stuff in some kind of reasonable time.

MNb wrote on 09/16/18 at 07:10:58:
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3/Bf4/Bg5 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 Nbd7
-10...b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.O-O transposes; note that Cbt suggests 12.Ng5.

11.O-O b5
Iso CbT's Nb6.

12.Bb3
-12.Bd3 achieved nothing in Wittmann-Schlosser, ÖST 1987.

12...b4
-Safer 12...Nc5 13.Rfe1 a5 but the problem of Ke8 remains.

13.Na4 Nxe4
-13...Bb7 14.Ng5 Rf8 15.Nxh7 Nxh7 16Qxh7 c5 17.a3 Bxe4 18.axb4 cxb4 19.Rfe1 += because Black's king has no safe spot.

14.Rfe1 f5 15.c3
-Instinctively I prefer the violent approach 15.Nxe5, but Nxe5 16.f3 Rf8 17.Rad1 Ba6 18.Qe3 Rd8 defends successfully.
15.a3 is also worth looking at.

15...bxc3 16.Nxc3 Nec5 17.Rad1
Black faces a lot of problems for a mere pawn.

Later addtion: White can play the same idea via 7...Nbd7 8.Nf3 e5 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 b4 12.Na4 Nxe4 13.O-O (Qe7 transposes immediately). Aggressive natures with an instinctive dislike of CbT's modest but good 9.Be2 might prefer it.
                   

This 11...b5 in the exact sequence above is not dumb at all. The idea I guess would be to take the central pawn and hope white doesn't manage to benefit from a lead in development later. Looking a bit with a computer I think there are probably a few ways to a decent sized advantage but the positions are not easy at all. I will post something on this later this evening.

kylemeister wrote on 09/29/18 at 18:25:47:
By the way, I see that Marin has a video about 4. Bf4 in the latest CBM.

Ok. Interesting. If he gets in to theory and such it could be nice but if it's just general talk about 4.Bf4 it could be a bit dry.

Which CBM issue would this be btw? (just to make sure, because I'll buy it) 186?

Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4355
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #58 - 09/29/18 at 18:25:47
Post Tools
By the way, I see that Marin has a video about 4. Bf4 in the latest CBM.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10268
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #57 - 09/16/18 at 07:10:58
Post Tools
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3/Bf4/Bg5 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 e5 8.Nf3 Qe7 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 Nbd7
-10...b5 11.Bb3 Nbd7 12.O-O transposes; note that Cbt suggests 12.Ng5.

11.O-O b5
Iso CbT's Nb6.

12.Bb3
-12.Bd3 achieved nothing in Wittmann-Schlosser, ÖST 1987.

12...b4
-Safer 12...Nc5 13.Rfe1 a5 but the problem of Ke8 remains.

13.Na4 Nxe4
-13...Bb7 14.Ng5 Rf8 15.Nxh7 Nxh7 16Qxh7 c5 17.a3 Bxe4 18.axb4 cxb4 19.Rfe1 += because Black's king has no safe spot.

14.Rfe1 f5 15.c3
-Instinctively I prefer the violent approach 15.Nxe5, but Nxe5 16.f3 Rf8 17.Rad1 Ba6 18.Qe3 Rd8 defends successfully.
15.a3 is also worth looking at.

15...bxc3 16.Nxc3 Nec5 17.Rad1
Black faces a lot of problems for a mere pawn.

Later addtion: White can play the same idea via 7...Nbd7 8.Nf3 e5 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Bc4 b5 11.Bb3 b4 12.Na4 Nxe4 13.O-O (Qe7 transposes immediately). Aggressive natures with an instinctive dislike of CbT's modest but good 9.Be2 might prefer it.
« Last Edit: 09/16/18 at 11:13:52 by MNb »  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 337
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: Pirc 4 Bf4: Best Lines/Move Orders
Reply #56 - 09/15/18 at 08:28:49
Post Tools
Hi.

I'll make a note to always trust chess GM judgement and also to have the most unequivocal trust in Leon_Trotsky.

If black plays the simple:
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Qd2 Bg4 7.d5 Bxf3 8.dxc6 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nxe4 10.Qb4 Nc5 11.cxb7 Rb8 12.Bb5+ Kf8 13.Bc6 Nxb7 14.Bxb7 c6!
To decouple the Bishop from the diagonal, preventing Qe4, he will win back the piece and is clearly better. The computer flips once it sees 14...c6.

But that means White's best 6th move is probably not 6.Qd2. On the other hand; how then to get on with white's position? Black will still have 6...Bg4 against most moves and combined with a undisturbed c6 knight this is very natural. Is white's faith to be put in 6.h3 in the future(?). Unlikely to bring much. It looks like black is simply fine after 5...Nc6 then and this move should be another reason for going 5.Qd2.

MNb wrote on 09/15/18 at 07:59:35:
6...O-O (iso 6...Bxh6) is as risky as 5...O-O but is probably better than its reputation. As IM Vigus pointed out in Dangerous Weapons after White's Bh6 GM Donner's setup (compare Ree-Donner, Dutch Ch 1967, Zierikzee) often is very reliable. It's not easy for White to find optimal transpositions to the Argentinean Attack (f3) or 150-Attack (Nf3).

5...O-O 6.f3 (or 6.O-O-O) is an improved version of 4.f3 Bg7 5.Be3 O-O 6.Qd2 as ...e5 simply loses a pawn and ...c5 7.d5 is a pretty good version of the Schmidt-Benoni (1.d4 c5 2.d5 d6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e4 g6 etc.). I haven't been able to figure out which version of 5...O-O 6.O-O-O c6 7.f3 b5 8.h4 (8.Bh6 again is nothing but a transposition) is best for White - the bishop on e3 or on f4.

I'll get to looking at castling next (almost done with 6...Bxh6 7.Qxh6 Qa5)

MNb wrote on 09/15/18 at 07:59:35:
Overall I do suspect that 4.Bf4 is anohter good reason to prefer Robatsch' move order, provided that Black also plays the King's Indian. After 1.e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.Bf4 Black has better than Nf6.

I suspect as well. I'll still look at every 4.Bf4 Pirc line though.

Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo