Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Opening TheoryOpening Theory
 
  Theory HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
winawer poisoned pawn books (Read 4157 times)
Jonathan Tait
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 158
Mansfield
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #30 - 07/17/10 at 16:05:06
 
Markovich wrote on 07/17/10 at 14:26:15:
I was using "Killer Line" to refer to the "Tait Variation."  I apologize for the unintended confusion resulting from the hyperbole, but am I mistaken that you do indeed uphold this line as killing the Poisoned Pawn?   You seem to.


Not really. I called my article "A Bust to the 7...Qc7 Winawer" in a nod towards Fischer's King's Gambit piece, and because my record with 16 Rg1 was so enormous that it equated to a bust in practical terms for me, if not necessarily a theoretical bust (busts are never so straightforward in such complicated positions; also, the analysis in that article was done without computer assistance, so there's quite a few mistakes in it). All the same, I'm naturally going to try to defend it from the White side if possible.

Markovich wrote on 07/17/10 at 14:26:15:
Should I be familiar with analysis that you and unnamed others worked out ten years ago?  In what readily available source am I expected to discover this?  But it hardly seems constructive, or friendly even, to say "Yes, yes, I have already looked at all that long ago," rather than simply to share the relevant chess ideas.  What are we discussing here if not the specifics of some chess positions?


Friendly and constructive? Okay, so maybe it wasn't, but your own posts hardly prompt friendly replies. The whole "Killer Line" post was needlessly sarcastic. And here you are at it again.

As for 24...Rxg5 (etc) in Simmelink-Oomen. No, there's no way you could be familiar with analysis we ("we" being me and various chessfriends) did ten years or so ago. Then again, what else could you expect? Obviously we analysed this since Fritz throws it out in a few seconds, doesn't it. But before sharing anything beyond the cursory reference to other 24th moves (and 22...Qxc3), as I said, I'd need to go back and look at it all again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 599
Manchester
Gender: male
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #31 - 07/17/10 at 19:08:09
 
Fllg wrote on 07/15/10 at 19:12:46:
Paddy wrote on 07/07/10 at 00:45:58:
I assume Bibs was referring to the line 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qc7 7. Qg4 f5 8. Qg3 cxd4 9. cxd4 Ne7 and now instead of the old 10.Bd2 etc White plays 10. Ne2 O-O 11. c3, e.g. 11...b6 12. Nf4 Qd7 13. a4 Ba6 14. Bb5! and Black's game is difficult. He probably has to change plan and play 11...Nc6, or Moskalenko's 8...Nc6. The Qc7 line has not been seen much in recent years, probably owing to this line and to the fact that even the old main lines of the Qc7 system are not exactly a bed of roses for Black.

If you are a subscriber to the French section of Chess Publishing, the quoted line, analysed by Neil McDonald, should be available to you in the archives.

If you have improvements, please post them here, since I am sure that there are many Winawer fans who would like to see the Qc7 line become a viable option once more!


I have already stated elsewhere in this forum that I had this in a game with White in 2005 which continued after 14.Bb5 Nec6 15.h4 Bxb5 16.axb5 Na5 17.h5 and now instead of 17... Nb3? analysed by Khalifman my opponent played the far superior 17... Qf7! and White seems to have no advantage. This has also been played by german GM Arik Braun vs. Zude in 2009 where Black won. I haven´t found anything really promising for White so as far as I can say Black is in good shape after 6... Qc7.


Thank you for this. I had actually noticed Zude-Braun, but since I (and my engines) still preferred White after 17...Qf7 I paid it little attention. I agree that it is a useful improvement from the black point of view - so many thanks!  Smiley

However, it does not seem to change the fundamentals of the position, with White having the safer king, more space, dark-square weaknesses to exploit, a weak black pawn at e6 and a potentially game-winning unopposed bishop. So White still looks better to me, and I  suggest that he also has more more ideas to work with; I think White should castle quickly to connect the rooks, rather than mess around with Rh3 ideas; it is probably better to postpone h5-h6 and keep it hanging over Black's head; White's queen can be a nuisance on g5; White's rooks can double on the a-file in some lines; the Ba3 may go to b4, to guard c3 and allow the rooks to press on the a-file, or to d6; if the bishop is threatened on d6, White is often just able to leave it there, since ...Nxd6 exd6 opens up new possibilities for White's pieces.

Black's possible a7-a6 break is double edged, but otherwise there seems little possibility of activity, since it is quite easy for White to stem any pressure on the c-file.

These are the impressions of an experienced 2140 player after investigating the position after 17...Qf7 with the help of various strong engines for a couple of hours; much as I would like the Qc7 line to be restored to full health, I have to say that even after this valuable improvement I would still rather be White.

I also note that so far in 2010 there has not exactly been a rush of GMs trying to repeat Braun's success - which is not firm evidence, of course, but is perhaps worth bearing in mind.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #32 - 07/17/10 at 20:06:08
 
Jonathan Tait wrote on 07/17/10 at 16:05:06:
.

Friendly and constructive? Okay, so maybe it wasn't, but your own posts hardly prompt friendly replies. The whole "Killer Line" post was needlessly sarcastic. And here you are at it again.


I'm completely mystified by this.  I can't see what in my post would fail to engender a normal chess-related, let us leave aside friendly, reply. Sarcastic about what?  I'm just trying to talk chess, with particular emphasis on understanding the value of the "Tait Variation" and the viability of the Poisoned Pawn.

I want to talk about the theory of this variation.  It's interesting that you have purported answers to my questions in your notes, and I would be most happy to know what they are.  Does this line challenge the Poisoned Pawn?  Is the Poisoned Pawn being upheld at high levels?  These questions interest me, and since they were raised by you, I would have hoped to be able to have a discussion on these subjects. 

If you don't like me, fine, but maybe we could actually talk some chess?  If you want to keep your private analyses under wraps, just say so; I could well understand that.
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
Tolotos
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 10
Graz
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #33 - 07/20/10 at 18:05:38
 
up to now the following move hasn´t been mentioned

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 d4 13.Rb1 Bd7 14.h4 Nf5 15.h5 0-0-0 16.Rg1 Be8 17.g4 Qe7!?

In my database I found two games with Qe7

Matei(2585)-Dorner(2377) ICCF 2008:
18.g5 Qc5 19.Rb5 Qf8 20.Bh3 a6 21 Rb1 Qc5 22.Bxf5 exf5 23.Qxf5 Bd7 24.Qe4 Be6 25.h6 Bd5 26.Qf5 Be6 27.Qe4 Ba2 1/2

Necula (2341)-Dorner (2372) ICCF 2009:
18.g5 Qc5 19.Bg2 a6 20.Kf2 Rh8 21.h6 Na5 22.Be4 Bb5 23.Rxb5 axb5 24.Bxf5 exf5 25.Qxf5 Kb8 26.Qd3 Nc4 27.Ng3 Qc6 28.Ne4 Qe6 29.Rf1 Nb2 30.Qf3 Nc4 31.f4 Qc8 32.Nd6 Qd7 33.Nxc4 bxc4 34.g6 fxg6 35.e6 Qe7 36.fxg6 Ka7 37.Qh5 Qxe6 38.Qa5+  Qa6
39.Qxa6+ Kxa6 40.g7 Rh7 41.Rd1 1-0

First I wondered what happened after 18.gxf5:
18.gxf5 Rxg1 19.Nxg1 Qh4+ 20.Kd1 f6! =

So 18.g5 is best;I think black has a good alternative  to 18...Qc5: 18...Qc7!? 19.Bg2 f6!?

A) 20.gxf6 Bxh5 21.Qc4 Bxe2 22.Kxe2(22.Dxe6 Kb8 23.f7 Rxg2 24.Rxg2 d3 25.Qxf5 d2 26.Bxd2 cxd2+ 27.Kf2 Ne7) d3+ 23.cxd3 Rxg2 24.Rxg2 Qh7=

B) 20.Bxc6 Bxc6! 21.exf6 Qf7 22.h6 (22.Qc4 Rge8 23.Rh1 Nd6=;22.Qh3 Rd7 23.h6 Rgd8 24.g6 Qxf6 25.g7 Nxg7=) Qh5 23.Rb4 Qh4+ 24.Kd1 Qf2=

C) 20.exf6 Bxh5

C1) 21.Rh1 Bg6 22.Be4 Th8 23.Rxh8 Rxh8 24.Qc4 (24.Kf1 Qh7 25.Qc4 Ne3+;24.Rb5 Qh7 25.Qc4 Kd8) Qd7 25.Kf2 Ne3+ 26.Bxc6 ( 26.Bxe3 Bxe4 27.Bxd4 e5) Rh2+ 27.Kg1 Rh1 28.Bxh1 Nxc4 29.Rxb7
(29.Bxb7 Kd8 30.Bf3 Qd6 31.Rb4 Nd2;29.f5 d3 30.Bxb7 Kd8 21.cxd3 Qxd3;29.f5 d3 30.cxd3 Qxd3 31.fxg6 Nd2)Qa4 30.Rb4 Qxc2 31.Rxc4 Kb8 32.Rb4+ (32.Bf3 d3 33.Rb4+ Kc7) Kc7=

C2) 21.Be4 Bg6 22.a4 (22.Ng3 Qd7 23.Kf2 Rh8 24.Nxf5 exf5 25.Bg2 Rde8 26.Kg3 Qh7 27.Rh1 Qxh1 28.Bxh1 Rxh1 29.Qb5 Reh8 30.Qxb7 Kd8 31.Qxc6 R8h3+ 32.Kf2 R3h2+ 33.Qg2 Bf7=) Rh8 23.Qc4 Rd6 24.Ba3 Rd5 25.Bxd5 exd5 26.Qxd5 Qh7 27.Qb3 Nd8 28.Be7 Ne3 29.Bxd8 Qh4 30.Rg3 Qh1 31.Ng1 Rh2=

C3) 21.Qc4 Nd6 22.Qa4 Nf5 23.Be4 (23.Bxc6 Qxc6 24.Qxc6 bxc6 25.a4 Bg6 ) Bxe2 24.Kxe2 d3+ 25.Bxd3 Ncd4+ 26.Kf1 Qh7 27.Qc4+ Kb8 28.Be4 Ng3+ 29.Rxg3 Qxe4=

18...Qc7!? 19.Bh3 Nce7 ( Niessen-Smithers IECG 1997 1/2 )

18... Qc7!? 19.Qc4 a6 20.Bg2 (20.a4 a5) b5 21.Qc5 Na5 22.Qxc7 Kxc7 unclear
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #34 - 07/20/10 at 18:23:38
 
Fascinating, thanks!  After 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 d4 13.Rb1 Bd7 14.h4 Nf5 15.h5 0-0-0 16.Rg1 Be8 17.g4 Qe7!? 18.g5 Qc7!? 19.Bg2 f6, White also has 20.g6 fxe5 21.Be4 (or perhaps some other move) with a chaotic situation.  I'm not sure, but I think I might rather be White then, whose pawns look so formidable.

In the mean time I can't see why 16...f6 isn't satisfactory for Black, handicapped as I am by not having access to reams of private analysis.   These perhaps are settled questions, but I'll be hanged if I know where to go to find the answers.
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
ReneDescartes
Junior Member
**
Offline


Qu’est-ce donc que je
suis? Une chose qui pense.

Posts: 57
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #35 - 07/20/10 at 19:56:04
 
Well, Mr. Tait is to be commended for posting his analysis, but not for his bluster (the "corollary") at the beginning of this thread. The reaction when you and others called his bluff sets my mind at ease about any hidden busts.

Unfortunately 16 ...f6 has scored an abysmal 18% from 11 games in my database.  The problem seems to be

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 d4 13.Rb1 Bd7 14.h4 Nf5 15.h5 0-0-0 16.Rg1 f6 17.g4 Nh6 18.exf6 Rxg4 19.Rxg4 Nxg4 and now 20.f7 and 20.Qg6 with the idea of f7 have scored well for White. Though I don't see that it has been played, if White has the nerve to do it he could make things even sharper with 20.Nxd5 Nxd5 21.Qxd5 and with a7 hanging it doesn't look that easy to me for Black to exploit the opening of the center.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #36 - 07/20/10 at 20:26:36
 
ReneDescartes wrote on 07/20/10 at 19:56:04:
Well, Mr. Tait is to be commended for posting his analysis, but not for his bluster (the "corollary") at the beginning of this thread. The reaction when you and others called his bluff sets my mind at ease about any hidden busts.

Unfortunately 16 ...f6 has scored an abysmal 18% from 11 games in my database.  The problem seems to be

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 d4 13.Rb1 Bd7 14.h4 Nf5 15.h5 0-0-0 16.Rg1 f6 17.g4 Nh6 18.exf6 Rxg4 19.Rxg4 Nxg4 and now 20.f7 and 20.Qg6 with the idea of f7 have scored well for White. If White has the nerve to do it, he could make things even sharper with 20.Nxd5 and it doesn't look that easy to me for Black to exploit the opening of the center with a7 hanging.


I don't think we need to belabor the whole politeness thing, since Tait evidently took some unintended offense to the way I expressed myself.  Apparently he doesn't want to share his private conclusions, which I respect.

In the line you quote Black has 17...fxe5 18.gxf5 exf5 with quite a bit of play, as shown in a Harding game quoted above by Tait.
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #37 - 07/20/10 at 20:43:09
 
I am really pissed off at Vitiugov now, noticing not only that he fails to treat the Tait Variation, but also that, after
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 Bd7 13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 O-O-O 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5  17.g4 Ba4 he gives only 18.c3 and blithely ignores 18.gxf5, for example 18...Bxc2 19.Qb5 Rxg1 20.Nxg1 was Smirnov-Arslanov, 2009.  Arslanov chose 20...a6 21. Qb6 Bxb1 22. Qxb1 Nb3 23. Kd1 Qc3 and lost; Goh Wei Ming (update May 2009) suggests 23...Nc5 but I still think White's game is easier.  Maybe I'm wrong because Black has drawn a couple of games, including Colastri-Cornette, Cap d'Agde 2008, which oddly enough isn't cited by Goh Wei Ming.

Goh Wei Ming also mentions 20... Bxf5 21.Bd2 Bxb1 22.Qxa5 b6 23.Qb4 Be4, and Black did draw two cc games after 20.Nh3, but to me it looks difficult for Black. 

Goh Wei Ming further mentions the older 16...f6 17.g4 Nh4 18.exf6 e5 19.f7 Rg7 and claims that Black has great compensation.  Who am I to disagree with an IM, but I can't see it after 20.f5 Rxf7 21.Rg3 e4 22.Qb3 Ne5 23.Bf4 Re7 as played in a CC game and now (instead of 24.f7) 24.Nxd4 Nhf3+ 25.Rxf3 exf3 26.Kf2 and White is much better, I opine.

Anyway I think that anyone who expects to be able to use Vitiugov as a basic resource for Black in the Winawer should think again, in view of his omission of at least two quite critical lines.
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
ReneDescartes
Junior Member
**
Offline


Qu’est-ce donc que je
suis? Une chose qui pense.

Posts: 57
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #38 - 07/20/10 at 23:10:27
 
Re: 16..f6: sorry, I didn't connect the dots. In the Harding game, maybe White can improve with 20.Kd1, preventing ...Qh4 (for the moment), but it does look like Black gets good compensation for the piece, with a huge flotilla of central pawns. Well, that's good news as far as I'm concerned.

In fact, the upshot of the latter part of this thread overall (no bust) is good news for me, since 7...Qc7 is in my repertoire and a real bust to it would be distressing, to say the least.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


I reckon so

Posts: 1471
Manchester
Gender: male
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #39 - 07/21/10 at 08:36:44
 
Markovich wrote on 07/20/10 at 20:43:09:
I am really pissed off at Vitiugov now, noticing not only that he fails to treat the Tait Variation, but also that, after
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 Bd7 13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 O-O-O 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5  17.g4 Ba4 he gives only 18.c3 and blithely ignores 18.gxf5, for example 18...Bxc2 19.Qb5 Rxg1 20.Nxg1 was Smirnov-Arslanov, 2009.  Arslanov chose 20...a6 21. Qb6 Bxb1 22. Qxb1 Nb3 23. Kd1 Qc3 and lost; Goh Wei Ming (update May 2009) suggests 23...Nc5 but I still think White's game is easier.  Maybe I'm wrong because Black has drawn a couple of games, including Colastri-Cornette, Cap d'Agde 2008, which oddly enough isn't cited by Goh Wei Ming.

Goh Wei Ming also mentions 20... Bxf5 21.Bd2 Bxb1 22.Qxa5 b6 23.Qb4 Be4, and Black did draw two cc games after 20.Nh3, but to me it looks difficult for Black. 

Goh Wei Ming further mentions the older 16...f6 17.g4 Nh4 18.exf6 e5 19.f7 Rg7 and claims that Black has great compensation.  Who am I to disagree with an IM, but I can't see it after 20.f5 Rxf7 21.Rg3 e4 22.Qb3 Ne5 23.Bf4 Re7 as played in a CC game and now (instead of 24.f7) 24.Nxd4 Nhf3+ 25.Rxf3 exf3 26.Kf2 and White is much better, I opine.

Anyway I think that anyone who expects to be able to use Vitiugov as a basic resource for Black in the Winawer should think again, in view of his omission of at least two quite critical lines.


He fails to mention a lot of stuff does good ol' Vitiugov - a nice chap with a high rating no doubt but as I said before this book is not really what French players were looking for: 5/10.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #40 - 07/21/10 at 18:06:02
 
ReneDescartes wrote on 07/20/10 at 23:10:27:
Re: 16..f6: sorry, I didn't connect the dots. In the Harding game, maybe White can improve with 20.Kd1, preventing ...Qh4 (for the moment), but it does look like Black gets good compensation for the piece, with a huge flotilla of central pawns. Well, that's good news as far as I'm concerned.

In fact, the upshot of the latter part of this thread overall (no bust) is good news for me, since 7...Qc7 is in my repertoire and a real bust to it would be distressing, to say the least.


But remember that if you want to play the Poisoned Pawn, 7...cxd4 is more precise.
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
Papageno
Full Member
***
Offline


FM

Posts: 231
Germany
Gender: male
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #41 - 07/21/10 at 22:48:21
 
Markovich wrote on 07/20/10 at 20:43:09:
(...) the older 16...f6 17.g4 Nh4 18.exf6 e5 19.f7 Rg7 and claims that Black has great compensation.  Who am I to disagree with an IM, but I can't see it after 20.f5 Rxf7 21.Rg3 e4 22.Qb3 Ne5 23.Bf4 Re7(...)

A recent corr game finished this way instead:
22... e3 23. Qxf7 Ne5 24. Qd5 Bc6 25. Qe6+ Bd7 26. Qd5 Bc6 27. Qe6+ Bd7 28. Qd5 Bc6 29. Qe6+ 1/2-1/2 Jirku,J (2332)-Volek,S (2308)/ICCF 2009
Nice improvement, I think.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Tolotos
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 10
Graz
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #42 - 07/22/10 at 12:11:19
 
Markovich wrote on 07/20/10 at 20:43:09:
I am really pissed off at Vitiugov now, noticing not only that he fails to treat the Tait Variation, but also that, after
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 Bd7 13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 O-O-O 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5  17.g4 Ba4 he gives only 18.c3 and blithely ignores 18.gxf5, for example 18...Bxc2 19.Qb5 Rxg1 20.Nxg1 was Smirnov-Arslanov, 2009.  Arslanov chose 20...a6 21. Qb6 Bxb1 22. Qxb1 Nb3 23. Kd1 Qc3 and lost; Goh Wei Ming (update May 2009) suggests 23...Nc5 but I still think White's game is easier.  Maybe I'm wrong because Black has drawn a couple of games, including Colastri-Cornette, Cap d'Agde 2008, which oddly enough isn't cited by Goh Wei Ming.


1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 dxc3 12.Qd3 Bd7 13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 O-O-O 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5  17.g4 Ba4 18.gxf5 Bxc2 19.Qb5 Rxg1 20.Nxg1 a6 21.Qb6 Bxb1 22.Qxb1 Nb3 23.Kd1 Nc5
My first impression was also that white is better here (R vs B+N ;h pawn) but the black pieces are well placed and coordinated,specially the knight on c5!

A) 24.Bd2 Kb8 (24...Dc6 25.fxe6 fxe6 26.Qc2 b6     27.Bxa6  Kb8 28.Bf1 Rg8 29.Nh3 Rg2!) 25.fxe6 fxe6 26.Ke1 Qc6 27.Qb4 (27.Qc2 Farkas-Weber ICCF 2009 1/2) Qh1 28.Qxc5 Qxg1 29.Qb6 Rh8=

B)24.Qc2 Qc6 25.fxe6 (25.Bg2 Calistri-Cornette 2008 1/2) fxe6 26.f5 Tg8 27.Nh3 d3 28.Qc4 Th8=

C)24.fxe6 fxe6 25.Nh3 Qc6 26.Bd2 Qf3+ 27.Ke1 Qxa3 28.Qb4 Qa1+ 29.Ke2 d3+ 30.Kf2 b6 31.Qxb6 Ne4+ 32.Kg2 Nxd2 33.Qc5+ Kb7 34.Qb4+ Kc8 35.Qxd2 Qb1=
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #43 - 07/22/10 at 20:48:22
 
@Tolotos:

Thanks very much for those ideas, which I'll take a serious look at.  I've fiddled with the pieces some along your lines, and Black does indeed seem to have some play, though I think White's game in general should be easier.

Papageno wrote on 07/21/10 at 22:48:21:
Markovich wrote on 07/20/10 at 20:43:09:
(...) the older 16...f6 17.g4 Nh4 18.exf6 e5 19.f7 Rg7 and claims that Black has great compensation.  Who am I to disagree with an IM, but I can't see it after 20.f5 Rxf7 21.Rg3 e4 22.Qb3 Ne5 23.Bf4 Re7(...)

A recent corr game finished this way instead:
22... e3 23. Qxf7 Ne5 24. Qd5 Bc6 25. Qe6+ Bd7 26. Qd5 Bc6 27. Qe6+ Bd7 28. Qd5 Bc6 29. Qe6+ 1/2-1/2 Jirku,J (2332)-Volek,S (2308)/ICCF 2009
Nice improvement, I think.


Brilliant.  Thanks for that!
Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
gewgaw
Senior Member
****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 261
europe
Re: winawer poisoned pawn books
Reply #44 - 08/23/10 at 19:30:48
 

But remember that if you want to play the Poisoned Pawn, 7...cxd4 is more precise. [/quote]

1.why?
2. Kasimdschanov recommended in beating the french 1 after 12. ...Bd7 13. Nc3 with the idea 14.h4 and Rh3 to protect the Nc3 "and practise has shown, that white has better prospects"  In his opinion 7.Qg4 0-0 is better, but he cant give any improvements for black in the game Karjakin - yussupov Cheesy Tongue
---> the french seems busted  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print