Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Opening TheoryOpening Theory
 
  Theory HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Morra Gambit ...Bd7 (Read 2728 times)
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 7593
Moengo
Gender: male
Morra Gambit ...Bd7
12/25/07 at 01:07:23
 
The big problem with the Morra Gambit is that Black has so many reasonable defences available. One of them is playing ...Bd7 at some point.

Stigma wrote on 12/24/07 at 10:00:08:
Just so it is clear to everybody, the line in question goes

1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 a6 (other move orders possible) 8.Qe2 Be7 9.Rd1 Bd7 and now White doesn't have his normal move Bg5, so must find something else, the main line continuing 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6 with a Boleslavsky/Classical Morra structure where white has wasted some time, but could argue that Bd7 is not optimally placed.

My claim (following Silman 1997) is that White is the one trying to equalize here, and if he makes that his goal he should consider following Burgess-Stage, Guldbjerg 1993 ('=' on move 16 according to several sources).


There are quite a few transpositions possible indeed. To expand the subject a bit I will use a quite unusual one:

1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Bd7 8.Qe2 (I am not convinced that 8.Nb5 is better, but if yes Black can avoid it by playing 8...Bd7 or 9...Bd7) when I recognize five options:
a) 8...a6 9.Rd1 Be7
b) 8...a6 9.Rd1 Qc7?! (loss of tempo)
c) 8...Nf6 9.Rd1 Be7
d) 8...Be7 9.Rd1 Qb8
e) 8...Qb8 9.Rd1 Nf6
I am willing to investigate all four lines.

To be honest I am only sure of variation b. 9...Qc7 invites 11.Rac1, after which Her Majesty has to go somewhere else. Stigma plays variation a, so I will start here as well.
One option is 10.a3, though generally speaking I suspect this move. As White after Rc8 still continues with 11.Bf4 e5 12.Be3 Nf6 (Palkovi suggests ...b5) I wonder if 10.a3 is not just a loss of tempo. There is a game Zelic-Pataki, Paks 2004, which I hardly understand: 13.Nd5 (iso 13.Rac1 0-0 14.b4 b5 from the Burgess-Stage game) Nxd5 14.Bxd5 0-0 15.Rac1 Qc7 (huh?) 16.h4 (huh?). More consequent is 10.a3 Nf6 11.b4 b5 12.Bb3 (or 12.Ba2, I don't know which square is best) 0-0 13.Bb2 Qc7 (after ...e5 White has the usual lasting compensation, but Qb8 also must be investigated) 14.Rac1 Rc8 15.Nd5 exd5 16.exd5 Qb7 17.dxc6 Bxc6 18.Ng5 with interesting complications.
Still I recommend 10.Bf4 at once with e5 11.Be3 Nf6 to follow. The usual 12.Rd2 0-0 13.Rad1 can be answered with Qc7 14.Bg5 (maybe 14.Nd5 is better; 14.h3 is another idea) Bg4! 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.Nd5 Qd8 17.h3 Nd4! and Black is better, Morshedi-Newsham, Dallas 2000.
It is my impression that doubling rooks on the d-file does not really work here. So best might be 12.h3 0-0 (Rc8!? 13.Rac1) 13.b4 (dismissed by Palkovi, but he missed something) Nxb4 14.Rab1 b5 (Qa5 15.Bd2 Qc5 16.Rxb4 Qxb4 17.Nd5) 15.Rxb4 d5 (bxc4 16.Rxc4 with sufficient compensation as White's pieces all are active and because of the d5 and d6-points) Pinter-Podlesnik, SLO 1994, 16.Nxd5! Bxb4 17.Nxe5! bxc4 18.Bb6! and White emerges with an advantage from the complications.
I do not claim an advantage, not at all, but it looks like White has more than one road to full compensation.
Back to top
 

Human civilization is the history of 3000 years of indigestion.
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1066
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #1 - 12/25/07 at 19:23:49
 
MNb wrote on 12/25/07 at 01:07:23:
I do not claim an advantage, not at all, but it looks like White has more than one road to full compensation.


I feel that even when Black plays ...e5 White cannot just rely on his 'long-term compensation' to see him through, he should have very concrete reasons to claim compensation. I want to comment on the lines you gave in turn.

MNb wrote on 12/25/07 at 01:07:23:
Stigma plays variation a, so I will start here as well.

I must admit I am not that interested in the other move orders, I thought they were just inferior, but maybe other forum members have something to say. There are specific reasons for delaying Nf6 (making White "waste" a tempo on not having Bg5 available) and I'm not keen on committing the queen to b8 or c7 yet. Why give White that information so early?
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Be7 8.Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7

MNb wrote on 12/25/07 at 01:07:23:
One option is 10.a3, though generally speaking I suspect this move. As White after Rc8 still continues with 11.Bf4 e5 12.Be3 Nf6 (Palkovi suggests ...b5) I wonder if 10.a3 is not just a loss of tempo. There is a game Zelic-Pataki, Paks 2004, which I hardly understand: 13.Nd5 (iso 13.Rac1 0-0 14.b4 b5 from the Burgess-Stage game) Nxd5 14.Bxd5 0-0 15.Rac1 Qc7 (huh?) 16.h4 (huh?). More consequent is 10.a3 Nf6 11.b4 b5 12.Bb3 (or 12.Ba2, I don't know which square is best) 0-0 13.Bb2 Qc7 (after ...e5 White has the usual lasting compensation, but Qb8 also must be investigated) 14.Rac1 Rc8 15.Nd5 exd5 16.exd5 Qb7 17.dxc6 Bxc6 18.Ng5 with interesting complications.


I actually doubt that white can do without a3 (or a4) now or soon, since Bc4 risks losing its nice diagonal to ...b5 and ...Na5. 10.a3 may be a loss of tempo, but is legitimate if White can provoke Nf6 and answer Bg5 in one move. Thus, as Black I would never play 10.a3 Nf6?! 11.Bg5! although maybe Black has chances to equalize there. In your line I would have thought 13.Bb2 e5! is good for Black, since the bishop looks strange on b2 in a Boleslavsky structure. OK, White is probably playing to arrange an f4-break, but it takes time.

After 10.a3, Rc8 was Silman's main recommendation, but 13.Nd5 in Zelic-Pataki (not mentioned by Silman) actually looks like one of the better White attempts I have seen. I need to look at this a bit more before I conclude. For the record Silman also gives 10...b5 11.Ba2 Rc8 12.Bf4 e5 13.Be3 Nf6 '=+' , I'm not sure who the insertion of ...b5 favors if White now goes for Zelic's 14.Nd5.

MNb wrote on 12/25/07 at 01:07:23:
Still I recommend 10.Bf4 at once with e5 11.Be3 Nf6 to follow. The usual 12.Rd2 0-0 13.Rad1 can be answered with Qc7 14.Bg5 (maybe 14.Nd5 is better; 14.h3 is another idea) Bg4! 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.Nd5 Qd8 17.h3 Nd4! and Black is better, Morshedi-Newsham, Dallas 2000.


13...Qc7 looks strange to me. It can be very convenient when White jumps into d5 to have a choice whether to capture immediately, later, or not at all. Maybe Black was trying to provoke White into Bg5, and succeeded! 14.h3 (as you mentioned) looks like a nice move to insert for White, and I don't like Black's queen on c7. In this 12.Rd2-line I prefer either 12...Ng4!? or 12..0-0 13.Rad1 h6.

MNb wrote on 12/25/07 at 01:07:23:
It is my impression that doubling rooks on the d-file does not really work here. So best might be 12.h3 0-0 (Rc8!? 13.Rac1) 13.b4 (dismissed by Palkovi, but he missed something) Nxb4 14.Rab1 b5 (Qa5 15.Bd2 Qc5 16.Rxb4 Qxb4 17.Nd5) 15.Rxb4 d5 (bxc4 16.Rxc4 with sufficient compensation as White's pieces all are active and because of the d5 and d6-points) Pinter-Podlesnik, SLO 1994, 16.Nxd5! Bxb4 17.Nxe5! bxc4 18.Bb6! and White emerges with an advantage from the complications.


I often see h3 when White insists on getting his bishop to g5. White needs either h3 or Be3 to prevent Black's strong plan of ...Bg4 and ..Nd4, but not necessarily both.
Since 13.a3 followed by b4 would be just normal play and not very challenging, I assume the point of 13.b4 is to do without a3. 16.Nxd5! does indeed look like a strong novelty over Pinter-Podlesnik!

But there is another problem for White; how to answer the simple 13...Rc8! with tactical threats against c4 and c3. 14.Rac1?! b5 followed by 15...Nxb4 and White certainly doesn't have compensation for two pawns. After 14.a3 b5 15.Bd5 Black could simply return to 'normal' play (i.e. White has played like in Burgess-Stage but spent time on h3) but should use the momentum with 15...Nxb4! 16.axb4 Rxc3 17.Rxa6 Nxd5 18.Rxd5 Qc8. Black has a clear advantage with a pawn and the bishop pair, and can take control of d5 whenever he wants. 15.Bd3 is a lesser evil for White, but he is not fighting for control of d5 and has to be worse, 15...Na5 being one possible continuation for Black.
Back to top
 

Improvement starts at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 7593
Moengo
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #2 - 12/26/07 at 03:15:38
 
I mentioned the other ...Bd7 options for two reasons: the sake of completeness and to invite others, who might be interested. It is a bit silly to have separate threads on all ...Bd7 lines. It is also fine with me to concentrate on
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Be7 8.Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7
and take this as a starting point for the time being.

Have you ever played gambits yourself? I suspect not or you would be more suspicious of 10.a3. At move 4 White's only compensation consists of a lead in development. His first task is to activate all his pieces and his second one to convert this lead into something concrete. The latter usually happens during the transition from opening to middle game. Now at the tenth move White still has two passive pieces: Ra1 and Bc1. Moreover Black has not made any concession yet. Still you want to play a prophylactic move, a move to preserve your bishop? Such logic suits the quieter variations of the Open Sicilian, not the Morra Gambit. My first and probably also my second reaction is that White does not have time for it.
Even after 10.a3 Nf6 11.Bg5 I am not sure about White's chances. Compare two related lines:
7...Nf6 8.Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Qc7 10.Bg5 Be7; in "our" line Black may try to find a better square for the queen.
7...Bd7 8.Qe2 Nf6 9.Rd1 Be7 (still handy, my overview) 10.Bg5 a6 and here White's best is 11.Rd2, not 11.a3.
But of course Black can argue that after 10.a3 he might force the white bishop to f4 anyway. 10.a3 Qc7 (10.a3 is less useful than 7...Bd7 compared to regular ...Qc7 lines) 11.Bf4 Ne5 12.Bxe5 dxe5 13.Rac1 Rd8 14.Ba2 Qb8 and Black is fine.
So the hesitating 10.a3 gives Black some good extra options.

To me it is clear now that White should try 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6 and I would say that the strong grip on d5 and the permanent weakness on d6 are two very concrete reasons to claim compensation. Being a pawn down White still needs active play of course and it is still a long game, so I can imagine Black wanting to play this line as well.

12.h3 0-0 13.b4 Rc8 and I have looked at 14.Nd5 but b5! 15.Bb6 Qe8. I do not trust 14.a3 b5 15.Bd5 Nd4! (maybe even better than Nxb4).
I cannot suppress the feeling that White misses a tempo. So what about immediately 12.b4!?
a)12...Nxb4 13.Rab1 b5 14.Rxb4 bxc4 (we already know 14...d5? 15.Nxd5!) 15.Rxc4 and Fritz likes this, but I am not so sure.
b)12...Rc8 13.Nd5 Nxd5 (b5? 14.Bb6) 14.Bxd5 Nxb4 15.Bxb7 Rc2 16.Qe1 was my idea with h3 and 0-0 included; unclear.
c)12...0-0 13.b5 (13.Nd5 does not work that well after Nxd5 14.Bxd5 Nxb4 15.Bxb7 Bb5) axb5 14.Bxb5 Bg4 unclear.
So maybe 12.Rd2 is still best after all.
a)12...0-0 13.Rad1 h6 I suggest 14.Nd5 (14.Nh4 b5! 15.Bb3 and only now Na5) once again as Nxe4 15.Bb6 Nxd2 16.Bxd8 Nxf3+ 17.Qxf3 Bxd8 18.Qa3 probably leaves Black with insufficient compensation for the queen and Nxd5 15.Bxd5 Bg4 16.h3 Bh5 17.g4 Bg6 18.Bxc6 bxc6 19.Bc5 wins the pawn back with an edge. Black has other move than 15...Bg4 of course but Black is left with some problems anyway.
b)12...Ng4 13.Nd5 Nxe3 14.Nxe7? is another piece of faulty Palkovi analysis as Na5! looks good. The normal 14.Qxe3 and 15.Rad1 must be enough for equality while 14.Nxe3 is also an interesting try.
Other tries are 12.Nd5 and [b]12.Rac1/[b] but I haven't looked at them yet.
Back to top
 

Human civilization is the history of 3000 years of indigestion.
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1066
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #3 - 12/27/07 at 11:42:22
 
I agree that it is logical to have one thread for all Bd7-lines. I also agree that the focus is on move order a) for the time being.

MNb wrote on 12/26/07 at 03:15:38:
Have you ever played gambits yourself? I suspect not or you would be more suspicious of 10.a3. At move 4 White's only compensation consists of a lead in development. His first task is to activate all his pieces and his second one to convert this lead into something concrete. The latter usually happens during the transition from opening to middle game. Now at the tenth move White still has two passive pieces: Ra1 and Bc1. Moreover Black has not made any concession yet. Still you want to play a prophylactic move, a move to preserve your bishop? Such logic suits the quieter variations of the Open Sicilian, not the Morra Gambit. My first and probably also my second reaction is that White does not have time for it.


I assume you didn't intend this to be as condescending as it appears. Yes, of course time is important in gambits, and of course 10.a3 is a kind of concession, but so is every White alternative including 10.Bf4 (which gives Black ...e5 with tempo, going into the respectable Classical Morra structure). The entire point of Black's move order is to put White in this "minor zugzwang", and to achieve this Black has himself made the slight concession ...Bd7, which may often turn out not to be the optimal square for the bishop.

In fact, the move a3 (between move 10 and 15) appears in many of those OTB games where, in my view, White has come closest to equalizing. They also involved some of the strongest tournament players who have risked the Morra with White, which is enough reason to take it seriously and prepare for it:

Parma-Eliskases           1962      1/2
Rizzitano-Benkö           1978      1-0
Nemet-Klauser             1993      1-0
Burgess-Stage             1993      1/2?
Mi.Zelic-Pataki              2004 (2) 1-0
Equidistance-Sophistry  2006      1/2 (note especially this endorsement from the strong Equidistance Freechess team)

So the respect shown to an early a3 does not, as you seem to suggest, rest solely on my own gambit experience (I have played the Evans, King's Gambit, Blackmar-Diemer and Benkö Gambit in rated tournament games, but only a game or two with each. Nowadays I have more respect for the value of material.)

Concretely, after 10.a3 Nf6 11.Bg5 Black may well be better off than in the other Bd7 lines, but sticking to my assumption that those lines are dubious for Black, allowing Bg5 still feels wrong to me. However, your line with 10.a3 Qc7 looks interesting and possibly good for Black. If in the end Zelic's Nd5 gives White enough compensation against both 10...Rc8 and 10...b5, I still have MNb's 10...Qc7 to look into. Smiley So while a3 is a move White often plays at some point maybe move 10 is not the right time (and maybe no time is right... we will see).

Returning to the main line 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6 I think we can agree that 12.h3 is a luxury White should try to do without.
In general when White just builds up (like Rd2/Rad1, Rac1 with or wthout a3, etc.) Black must find some way to make progress without falling for tactics on the d-file, or simply dropping the d-pawn. I usually operate with four main plans that are not all mutually exclusive:

1) Try to get in ...Bg4 and ...Nd4. Experienced Whte players either prevent this with h3 or keep the bishop on e3. I don't usually play ...Bg4 unless the Nd4 follow-up is likely to be available, but maybe I should consider it more often since h3 and especially g4 are very committal moves from White.

2) Playing ..Be6 which invites Bxe6 fxe6. In this structure Black increases his central control and often gets play on the kingside (the recent game Colding-Krush annotated on Chesspublishing.com is a model, although from a different move order). I think White should only allow this if he has an immediate tactical follow-up, usually against e6.

3) Exchanging on d5 in such a way that White must recapture with the pawn, thus giving Black a mobile kingside pawn-majority. It is maybe strange that White allows this at all, but sometimes Black can start a skirmish on the queenside to misplace White's pieces first and then exchange.

4) Playing on the kingside with ...Kh8 and ...f5, usually after an exchange or two on d5 to reduce White’s tactical chances in the centre. I think of this as Black’s last resort if White has coped with Plans 1-3, and it can be very effective not least because many White players assume only they have attacking chances. Black threatens to get serious play on the f-file and against g2. The move ...Qe8 is usually an important part of this plan, to stop tactics based on Nxe5, overprotect Nc6, and prepare to swing the queen over to g6 or h5. This is a main reason I don’t like committing to Qc7 early.

First, 12.Rd2. It has become apparent to me that you are finding the same holes in Palkövi as I have, but whereas I stopped there you are looking for improvements for White as well!

My interest in 12...Ng4 was largely based on that hole in Palkövi (14.Nxe7? Na5), but I agree 13.Nd5 Nxe3 14.Qxe3 has to be better. In my old notes I then intended Plan 1) 14...Bg4 to gain access to d4 for the knight, but Black's material advantage seems difficult to convert with Bc4 becoming such a strong piece. White is at or very close to full compensation. 14.Nxe3 obviously stops Bg4, but after 14...0-0 I imagined the knight would not stay on e3 for long. Looking at it now, probably White can employ some prophylactic thinking and eliminate Black's idea entirely.

So, 12.Rd2 0-0 13.Rad1 h6 remains my main response. While 14.Nd5 is better than Palkövi’s 14.Nh4, Black should of course not fall for the Bc5 trick, but instead play Plan 4): 14...Nxd5 (14...Nxe4 15.Bb6 Nxd2 16.Bxd8 Nxf3+ 17.Qxf3 Bxd8 18.Qa3 is interesting, Black nominally has enough for the Queen but to me this looks hard to win for either side.) 15.Bxd5 (15.exd5 looks just silly with two rooks on the d-file) 15...Qe8! 16.a3 Kh8! Intending ...f5. White’s pieces don’t threaten anything in the centre, and while Black’s extra pawn on d6 looks a bit irrelevant at the moment, it is a useful ”endgame insurance” if Black can’t break through on the kingside. White has not equalized here.

White’s troubles in this line lead me to think your novelty 12.b4!? deserves strong consideration. Since this is already a monster post I will leave further discussion of that till later and just note that 12...0-0 intuitively appears the most sensible reply to me.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 12/27/07 at 15:19:39 by Stigma »  

Improvement starts at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 7593
Moengo
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #4 - 12/28/07 at 15:28:16
 
Stigma wrote on 12/27/07 at 11:42:22:
I assume you didn't intend this to be as condescending as it appears.

Eeehh, what does condescending mean? I am only Dutch .... If it is something negative, no, I did not intend it.
As my computer is in repair for two weeks - the disadvantage of living at the edge of the jungle - you must wait for a serious answer.
Best wishes for 2008, including a lot of wins against the Morra.  Wink
Back to top
 

Human civilization is the history of 3000 years of indigestion.
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 3758
Holland
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #5 - 12/28/07 at 23:20:34
 
neerbuigend
Back to top
 

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1066
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #6 - 12/29/07 at 09:43:55
 
MNb wrote on 12/28/07 at 15:28:16:
Eeehh, what does condescending mean? I am only Dutch .... If it is something negative, no, I did not intend it.

You seemed to be saying that my respect for 10.a3 showed a poor understanding of gambit play, while actually it was just based on the available games. I'm just a pragmatic OTB player, after all! But let's not lose sleep over this.
Btw. I have discovered that Silman analyzed 10.Be3 Nf6 11.Bg5 to a Black advantage by trading the d6-pawn for the bishop pair (x.Bxf6 Bxf6), so we could ask how much the extra move a3 benefits White after 10.a3 Nf6 11.Bg5.

Best wishes to you (and your computer!).

As for wins against the Morra, sadly I have yet to face a White player who had bothered to study it in detail, they are usually just untheoretical hackers. If that trend continues I expect the points to keep rolling in!  Wink
Back to top
 

Improvement starts at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
 
IP Logged
 
Dragonslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 190
Copenhagen
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #7 - 01/02/08 at 17:40:09
 
Actually some of the holes in Pálkövi's book stem from the Trends in the SMG 2 booklet, where you will find some short analysis to the games N.Regan-Duncan, London 1994. Pálkövi even quotes N.Regan and suggests 14.Qxe3!? so perhaps we should not be so harsh.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1066
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #8 - 01/03/08 at 13:59:36
 
I don't think we are being harsh, pointing out these improvements can be useful to White and Black players alike, certainly it would be harsher to have to deal with them over the board.  Besides, Palkövi writing around the year 2000 could have used a reasonably strong engine to check these things.

I recall some excellent articles on the Morra by a certain Jensen in Correspondence Chess News, but I don't think our current Bd7 move order was discussed. I have sometimes wondered what the author might have had in mind...  Smiley

I have recently become aware of some games by the strong Philippinian player Senador where he insists on getting his bishop to g5, and is willing to spend a tempo on h3 to safeguard the d4 square. Right now I am inclined to think this is White's best attempt at real compensation. The first of these games was annotated by Gary Lane on ChessPublishing, by the way:

[Event "Asean Open"]
[Site "Bandar Seri Begawan"]
[Date "2001.??.??"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Senador, Emmanuel"]
[Black "Dang Tat Thang"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B21"]
[WhiteElo "2433"]
[BlackElo "2273"]

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. Qe2 a6 9. Rd1 Bd7 10. Bf4 b5 11. Bb3 e5 12. Be3 Nf6 13. h3 O-O 14. Bg5 Be6 15. Bxf6 Bxf6 16. Nd5 Bxd5 17. Bxd5 Rc8 18. a4 Qb6 19. axb5 axb5 20. Bxc6 Rxc6 21. Rd5 Rc5 22. Rad1 Be7 23. Nh2 Rfc8 24. Nf1 Rxd5 25. Rxd5 Rc5 26. Ne3 Bg5 27. Rxc5 dxc5 28. Qg4 Qd8 29. Nd5 g6 30. Qg3 Bf4 31. Qc3 Qd6 32. b3 Bg5 33. Qd3 Qc6 34. Qg3 Bf6 35. Qxe5 Bxe5 36. Ne7+ Kg7 37. Nxc6 Kf6 38. Kf1 Ke6 39. Ke2 b4 40. Nd8+ Ke7 1/2-1/2

[Event "Dato Arthur Tan Malaysian Op"]
[Site "Kuala Lumpur MAS"]
[Date "2007.08.26"]
[Round "11"]
[White "Senador, E."]
[Black "Nanjo, R."]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B21"]
[WhiteElo "2380"]
[BlackElo "2165"]
[Source "Mark Crowther"]

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O Be7 8.Qe2 a6 9. Rd1 Bd7 10. Bf4 e5 11. Be3 Nf6 12. h3 O-O 13. Bg5 Rc8 14. Bxf6 Bxf6 15. Nd5 Be6 16. Rac1 Bg5 17. Rc3 Bh6 18. a3 b5 19. Ba2 Ne7 20. Rxc8 Bxc8 21. Nc3 Qb6 22. Qd3 Nc6 23. Nd5 Qb8 24. g4 g6 25. Nf6+ Kh8 26. g5 Bg7 27. Qxd6 Qa8 28. Bd5 Bb7 29. Nd7 Rd8 30. Bxc6 Bxc6 31. Nfxe5 Bxd7 32. Nxf7+ Kg8 33. Nxd8 Qxd8 34. Qxd7 Qxg5+ 35. Kh1 Bxb2 36. Qe8+ Kg7 37. Rd7+ Kh6 38. Qf8+ 1-0
Back to top
 

Improvement starts at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
 
IP Logged
 
Dragonslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 190
Copenhagen
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #9 - 01/04/08 at 14:33:06
 
Yes I always wondered that too, since I play this variation with Black  Wink

Actually the lines with ...Bd7 were covered in two ways:

1) Via the move-order 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cd4 3.c3 dc3 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0-0 Nf6 8.h3 e6 9.Qe2 Be7 10.Rd1 Be7 (CCN 91) Here 11.Bg5 is good.

2) The main line with Bd7: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cd4 3.c3 dc3 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Be7 8.Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7 (CCN 94) And somewhat embarrasingly I made the same mistake as Pálkövi  Undecided

According with the lines given in CCN, in the last game I would consider after 10. Bf4 e5 11. Be3 Nf6 12. h3 O-O 13. Bg5 to avoid the capture on f6 with 13...Ne8!?
17...Na5 removing the bishop from the diagonal also looks strong.

You will also see that I preferred a plan with Rd2 and Rad1. But in actual fact I made a huge mistake in that line after 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6 12.Rd2 Nf6 13.Rad1 Rc8! 14.Bg5 I only considered 14...Ne8 leading to even chances, which I still believe is correct.
However, I think I seriously underestimated 14...Bg4 (to the point of not mentioning it in the article). If White goes for 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.Rxd6 then 16...Qc7! wins the exchange.
On the other hand 15.Qd3 Bxf3 16.Qxf3 Nd4 is not terribly promising.

In the meantime I tried to make 12.Nd5 work and was pleased to see Zelic try it (Zelic-Patak, Split 2004).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1066
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #10 - 01/05/08 at 00:08:39
 
Thanks for this very informative reply. I stand guilty of sloppy research, I had simply overlooked the existence of this part 7 in CCN 94! It looks very useful, certainly it is nice to have a source that is more thorough than Palkövi and more White-friendly than Silman.

So it appears that Black can be very confident of his chances after 12.Rd2 0-0 13.Rad1, with both 13...h6 and 13...Rc8 looking promising for him? I have a lot of ideas to chew on now (12 b4!? MNb, 12.h3 Senador, 12.Nd5 Zelic, and 12.a3 Rc8 Equidistance [by transposition]), so I will try to stay away from this thread until I have some serious analysis to contribute!

Just some quick thoughts on Senador-Nanjo (12.h3 0-0 Bg5): I like Black after your suggestion of 17...Na5!, but maybe earlier White could have tried 15.Rxd6!? Qc7 (again those double-attack ideas, with ...Nd4 threatened) 16.Rxf6 (or 16.Qd2!? Rfd8! 17.Rxf6) gxf6 17.Nd5 which at the very least looks scary for Black to face over the board.

As for 13...Ne8 the time-loss involved makes me a bit skeptical, shouldn't White be able to drum up at least enough compensation somehow? In CCN 94 the point is made (if I read it right) that by Bg5xe7 White exhanges off his good bishop for Black's bad one, but Be7 is also a typical case of "a bad bishop protecting a good pawn" (according to rebel strategic thinker Mihai Suba). When I play these positions as Black I think of Be7 as the one defensive piece that single-handedly holds the fort on d6, often allowing Black's other pieces to operate on either side of the board (maybe this is just a matter of taste though).

That's why I would love to avoid having to deal with Bg5 altogether, and I have wondered if Black can simply meet the slow 12.h3 with his own slow 12...h6, but of course White can consider both 13.Nh4 and 13.Nd5 a la Zelic in reply and... I need to analyse some more  Wink
Back to top
 

Improvement starts at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 1703
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #11 - 01/05/08 at 01:33:42
 
Stigma wrote on 12/29/07 at 09:43:55:
As for wins against the Morra, sadly I have yet to face a White player who had bothered to study it in detail, they are usually just untheoretical hackers. If that trend continues I expect the points to keep rolling in!  Wink


This has been my experience also.

Tops Smiley
Back to top
 

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Hannes Langrock
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 6
Leipzig
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #12 - 07/05/10 at 23:53:50
 
Morra threads shouldn't be dead, so I'm trying to put some life into this one.  Smiley

I believe that among the ...Bd7 lines the Eliskases line (4...Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 a6 8.Qe2 Be7 9.Rd1 Bd7 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6) is the only really critical one.
The most interesting answer seems to be 12.Nd5!?. This exchanges a piece, but after 12...Nxd5 13.Bxd5 White has a dominating bishop on d5. The main line continues 13...0-0 14.Rac1 Rc8 15.a3! (gaining space at the queenside)
Now Black's only active plan seems to be 15...Kh8 16.b4 f5, but then after 17.exf5 Rxf5 18.Nd2! the knight is going to e4 and White has nice compensation for the pawn.
According to my database the whole line with 15.a3 has been played 9 times (7x in corr games) with both sides scoring 4,5 points.
After playing the line in more than a dozen online blitz games and doing some analysis with Rybka, I think it is objectively equal, but easier to play for White (especially OTB).   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Djy
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 58
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #13 - 07/07/10 at 12:38:00
 
Ouah! Hannes Langrock himself on the forum cool Cool and very interesting line Thanks you!
Back to top
 

L'éternité, c'est long...surtout vers la fin!  KAFKA
La victoire est brillante mais l'échec est mat!  Coluche
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 7593
Moengo
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #14 - 07/08/10 at 01:06:08
 
The reason I never have looked seriously at this is that White;s results have been disastrous in the past. Langrock's main line actually has been tested:

Poenitz,S - Reiners,C [B21]
BdF corr BdF, 1996

1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0–0 Be7 8.Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7 10.Bf4 e5 11.Be3 Nf6 12.Nd5 Nxd5 13.Bxd5 0–0 14.Rac1 Rc8 15.a3 Kh8 16.b4 Qe8 17.Nd2 f5 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.f3 Nd8 20.Rxc8 Bxc8 21.Ne4 Qa4 22.Qd3 Bf5 23.Rb1 Bg6 24.b5 Bf7 25.Rb4 Qa5 26.Bg5 Qc7 27.Bxe7 Qxe7 28.bxa6 bxa6 29.Ra4 Qa7+ 30.Kf1 Qc7 31.Rxa6 Bg6 32.a4 Qc1+ 33.Kf2 Bxe4 34.Bxe4 Nf7 35.Ra8 Rxa8 36.Bxa8 Qb2+ 37.Kg3 Qb4 38.Qf5 Qe1+ 39.Kh3 g5 40.Qe4 Qd2 41.Qc4 d5 42.Bxd5 Nd6 43.Qb3 g4+ 44.fxg4 Qh6+ 45.Kg3 Qf4+ ˝–˝
Back to top
 

Human civilization is the history of 3000 years of indigestion.
 
IP Logged
 
Hannes Langrock
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 6
Leipzig
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #15 - 07/08/10 at 19:06:52
 
Djy wrote on 07/07/10 at 12:38:00:
Ouah! Hannes Langrock himself on the forum cool Cool and very interesting line Thanks you!


Thanks for these nice words. After a break of 4 years, I decided to defend the Morra case again, I just couldn't help myself  Smiley



MNb wrote on 07/08/10 at 01:06:08:
The reason I never have looked seriously at this is that White;s results have been disastrous in the past.


For the same reason (+ some general assumptions about exchanging pieces being a pawn down) I had dismissed 12.Nd5 in the past. But Deep Rybka 4 was so persistent in claiming that it's the best move, that I had to go deeper eventually.
By the way, White's performance in this line improves significantly after the move 14.Rac1.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 848
Anaheim, CA, USA
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #16 - 07/08/10 at 22:38:19
 
Off-topic:

A big welcome to Hannes Langerock, I'm a big fan of your CBM articles, especially your Petrosian QID articles in CBM 132/133.
Back to top
 

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
BPaulsen bryanswpaulsen@yahoo.com AddictedLifter  
IP Logged
 
Hannes Langrock
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 6
Leipzig
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #17 - 07/10/10 at 01:17:15
 
BPaulsen wrote on 07/08/10 at 22:38:19:
Off-topic:

A big welcome to Hannes Langerock, I'm a big fan of your CBM articles, especially your Petrosian QID articles in CBM 132/133.


I am happy that you like the articles (and that someone actually reads them).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 1703
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #18 - 07/28/10 at 03:56:42
 
Maybe we can get Lenderman or Esserman to post something on this Gambit here as well.

Looking at the Chessbase Site just moments ago I noticed Lawrence Trent has a new CBFT out on The Smith Morra, so it would seem the resurrection of this thread is timely.

I suppose a Morra player need be also quite expert in the equal lines following 2...Nf6.

Tops Smiley
Back to top
 

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 7593
Moengo
Gender: male
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #19 - 07/28/10 at 11:22:02
 
TopNotch wrote on 07/28/10 at 03:56:42:
I suppose a Morra player need be also quite expert in the equal lines following 2...Nf6.

Tops Smiley


No. Morra players hardly ever meet 1.e4 c5 2.d4 Nf6. In about one of four games Black plays 3...Nf6 though, which has been common knowledge at least since 1980.
Back to top
 

Human civilization is the history of 3000 years of indigestion.
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline


Doh!  Can I take that
back?

Posts: 4376
Columbus, Ohio
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #20 - 07/28/10 at 17:02:19
 
Yes, a hearty welcome, Hans Langrock, to our humble forum! 

The whole thing about the Morra is that it can be offered not only on the third move, but the fourth: e.g. 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 (which is how I have always played the Sicilian) 3.d4 cxd4 4.c3.  So Black's answer to the Morra depends on what move he makes after 2.Nf3.  I, for example, must opt for a method that situates Black's pawn on e6.

Back to top
 

The Great Oz has spoken!
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 488
Re: Morra Gambit ...Bd7
Reply #21 - 07/28/10 at 18:15:02
 
This is true, 2.Nf3 and 3.d4 cxd4 4.c3 is possible.  That move order contains a significant problem though if White doesn't want to be led into an Open Sicilian: 2...d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.c3 Nf6 is strong, 5.e5 (probably best, 5.Bd3 dxc3 leaves the bishop misplaced) 5...dxe5 6.Nxe5 and now 6...Nc6, 6...e6 or 6...Qa5 and Black is probably a bit better.  I've never trusted that line for White, so if using this move order (or the one below) I usually meet the ...d6 lines with 4.Nxd4.

I've also looked into the move order 2.d4 cxd4 3.Nf3 and 4.c3 which comes to the same thing.   This move order entices the dubious 3...e5 4.c3 (similar to the idea 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.Nf3, encouraging the anti-positional 3...c5) but again Black has 3...d6 transposing to the line above.  Also if White wants to use that order to reach an Open Sicilian then 2...a6 is an effective response.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print