Latest Updates:
Normal Topic Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!? (Read 4181 times)
lnn2
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1504
Location: nc
Joined: 09/22/04
Re: Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!?
Reply #4 - 04/14/08 at 09:05:54
Post Tools
I think White is good in Van Wely-Carlsen (and the earlier stem game Carlsen-Naiditsch) after 8.Qg3 Nc6 9.b4 e5 10.e4 0-0 11.Bd3 where White just about keeps his position together and has the extra pawn for the moment, the blunt 9. Qxg7 may well be critical in future, but understandably many White players don't like to concede the initiative if they can get an advantage by safer means.

More interesting for Black is 8... 0-0 9. Bh6 Ne8. Morozevich won recently with 10. h4!?, but its not the last word in this line. There was also a particularly hairy and entertaining Khismatullin- Yemelin slugfest in recent NIC yearbook. This gambit looks like one of the better practical weapons against 4. Qc2 at the moment, if Black is not content with the drawish 4...0-0 lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Legion XIX
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 44
Location: ?
Joined: 04/14/08
Re: Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!?
Reply #3 - 04/14/08 at 04:24:07
Post Tools
Are you sure Black has enough compensation after a continuation such as 8.Qg3 Nc6 9.Qg7 Rg8 10.Qh6 e5?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
The_Shah
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


J'adore l'echecs!

Posts: 44
Joined: 04/12/08
Re: Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!?
Reply #2 - 04/13/08 at 01:11:25
Post Tools
This gambit is covered in some detail in Dangerous Weapons: Nimzo-Indian and in Vigorito's "Challenging the Nimzo-Indian".

In DW, John Emms concludes that 6...c5 is a dangerous pawn sacrifice. He claims that 8.Qc2 allows Black good, active play and that 8.Qg3 Nc6!? leads to positions where at the least Black's position is much the easier to play. (Quote, with minor modifications).

In "Challenging the Nimzo-Indian", Vigorito concludes that 6...c5 is very sharp and unexplored; it is a dangerous weapon against an unprepared player, but he deems it theoretically suspect.

At the moment, there is still no clear verdict on this variation, but given that White has a 52% score in the position after 7...d4, with Black scoring 50 performance rating points below his average rating to boot according to Mega 2008. But the final word has definitely not been said yet...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!?
Reply #1 - 04/12/08 at 16:15:31
Post Tools
Chevalier,

Welcome to the Chess Pub!  I've read a few of your messages and already I can see that you have a nice, deep sense of what you want in your chess games.

My short answer to your question is that the Romanishin Gambit is certainly going to score well in tnmts, at least up to the 2300 level.  I imagine you already have an arsenal for lines that don't include 4.Qc2. 

I had always thought that White needs to consider ...c5 at almost every point of the 4.Qc2 Nimzo.  If Black plays it, he had better be prepared, but White will know instantly that you are ready for a fight.  My instinct is to prefer 8...0-0, but I imagine that 8...Nc6 will score well for you if you put some serious work behind it. 

I don't know that 8...Nc6 will do well as the only move in your repertoire.  This is the move that should be kept as a surprise weapon.  I feel (and that's all it is, a feeling) that White could come up with something nasty and end up with a clear advantage in the endgame.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Chevalier
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 265
Joined: 04/11/08
Romanishin Gambit 6...c5!?
04/12/08 at 11:52:43
Post Tools
Hello,

What do you think of the Romanishin Gambit, which occurs after the moves 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 d5 5.a3 Bc3 6.Qc3 c5!?. Black seems to obtain good practical chances and continues to score well in practice even though the surprise effect of this variation is nonexistent at high levels.

Also, in the critical variation 7.dc5 d4 8.Qg3, which move is stronger: the solid 8...0-0, or the sharper 8...Nc6!?, sacrificing another pawn to increase Black's initiative?

P.S Here is the most recent game featuring 6...c5, where Carlsen convincingly defeated Van Wely:

Van Wely, Loek - Carlsen, Magnus [E36]
Melody Amber Blindfold, Monaco
16.03.2008

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 d5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Qxc3 c5 7.dxc5 d4 8.Qg3 Nc6 9.b4 e5 10.e4 0-0 11.Bd3 b6 12.Nf3 bxc5 13.b5 Nh5 14.Qg5 Qxg5 15.Bxg5 Na5 16.Rb1 f6 17.Bd2 Nb7 18.h3 g5 19.Ke2 Nd6 20.g4 Ng7 21.a4 Bb7 22.h4 Nxe4 23.hxg5 Nc3+ 24.Bxc3 e4 25.Bxe4 Bxe4 26.Bd2 Rae8 0-1

  

Nothing has meaning or value other than the meaning and value that you give it.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo