BPaulsen
God Member
   
Offline

I Love Light Squares!
Posts: 850
Anaheim, CA, USA
Gender:
|
I posted this in a different thread, and I even e-mailed Semkov about it to pass it along to Khalifman so that it (hopefully) isn't missed in the revised edition of Volume 3A. I would be sorely, sorely disappointed if white's recommendation gets repeated without either significant improvements, or changing the preference (ie: 5. Nc3, 3. Nc3, or 3. g3)
1. Nf3 c5 2. c4 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. g3
More of a side-note, but Davies recommends this sequence as well in "The Dynamic Reti". It's too bad the upcoming sequence appears to be a complete equalizer with strong practical chances for black:
5...e5 6. Nb5 (6. Nc2 d5 =) Bb4+.
This is mentioned by Khalifman, but his primary recommendation leads to a position that may well be =+, because he doesn't give black's best follow-up.
7. Bd2 a6! (best, unmentioned) 8. Bxb4 (forced) axb5 9. Bd6 (forced) Qa5+ 10. Nd2 (10. Nc3 Ne4, 10. Qd2 Ne4 11. Qxa5 Nxa5 =+) Ne4 11. c5 Nxd6 12. cxd6 Qb4 with complete equality, possibly even =+.
So that leaves the secondary recommendation, but things are no rosier for white here either:
7. N1c3 d6! (unmentioned, but obvious) 8. a3 Bxc3+ 9. Nxc3 (9. bxc3 0-0 =) Be6 10. Bg2 (10. e4?! 0-0 with initiative, white has way too many weaknesses to cover) Bxc4 11. Qa4 Be6 12. Bg5 (12. Bxc6 bxc6 13. Qxc6 Kf8 14. Bg5 Rc8 15. Bxf6 gxf6 =) 0-0 =
The door is slammed shut on 5. g3 barring improvements.
|