(UTC) |
 |
|
| Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
|
 Discussion forum for ChessPublishing.com, the opening theory site |
 |
QGD Mainline
Ragozin , Vienna, Cambridge Springs, Lasker, Tartakower [D38-39 & D50-69] (Moderators: proustiskeen, TN)
|
Topics: 81
Posts: 1258 |
 Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
 |
| Subject / Started By | Replies | Views | Last Post  |
||
 |
 |
Can you play for win with QGD (Tartakower etc.)
After several years of trying offbeat lines, I am planning to pick up a standard line which doesn't require regular "theory study" to stay alive in open tournaments. I am an IT professional with aroun...
Started 12/13/11 at 02:56:22 by saubhikr « Pages 1 2 all » |
26 | 32191 |
 01/15/12 at 08:07:46By: Gilchrist is a legend |
|
|
QGD Tartakower
Hello,
I was wondering what could be considered the main line in the Tartakower nowadays. I have the Opening for White according to Kramnik book and it advices to play 11.0-0 (after 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4... Started 03/25/06 at 16:01:32 by Joris_Pelemans « Pages 1 2 all » |
25 | 20795 |
07/12/06 at 21:18:54 By: Dragan Glas |
 |
|
Tartakower against 5. Bf4?
The theory on 5. Bf4 mostly focuses on either the 6...Nbd7 or 6...c5 lines. Pardon my ignorance but why isn't the tartakower setup (1. d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 b6) played more ...
Started 02/04/05 at 08:30:09 by lnn2 |
11 | 6084 |
03/26/24 at 18:44:07 By: H-HH |
|
|
Panczyk/Ilczuk on QGD Vienna
Everyman has announced a new book for Summer 2018:
Queen´s Gambit Declined : Vienna by Panczyk/Ilczuk ~400 pages , 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Nf3 Bb4 5 Bg5 dc4 Nice cover: https://www.everymanch... Started 03/19/18 at 14:50:20 by tracke « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
41 | 24433 |
10/15/21 at 18:04:58 By: FreeRepublic |
|
|
Has anyone heard about the Tartakower defence?
I remember that Karpov, Nigel Short even Kasparov and Fischer use to play the Tartakower and they got excellent results with it. What happened after that? Isn't the Tartakower good anymore? Was it ref...
Started 05/05/08 at 01:53:47 by Pingudon |
11 | 9164 |
05/20/08 at 18:10:06 By: kylemeister |
|
|
Good Reply to Tartakower
can someone suggest a good way to deal with tartakower? I have been losing a lot of games lately. I play the Bxf6 line.
Started 05/30/07 at 05:16:24 by sssthepro « Pages 1 2 all » |
28 | 17575 |
08/23/07 at 05:53:11 By: lnn2 |
|
|
cambridge springs
My next opponent plays cambridge springs; nowadays it´s played quite seldom, so I´m not familiar with the current theory, for example NCO evaluates this line between "=" and unclear.
--> any hint... Started 09/28/10 at 19:36:51 by gewgaw |
10 | 9450 |
10/03/10 at 20:04:35 By: Markovich |
|
|
Main Line Cambridge Springs
Can anybody give me any guidance about which is the best/most annoying line for Black in the Cambridge Springs after
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Nbd7 5. Nf3 c6 6. e3 Qa5 7. Nd2 (best) Bb4... Started 09/10/03 at 09:43:49 by notagmyet « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
40 | 24188 |
09/23/05 at 00:11:35 By: Smyslov_Fan |
 |
|
Orthodox defence
Do you know the Orthodox defence?
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bg5 o-o 6.e3 c6 7.Qc2 Nbd7 8.Rc1 a6 9.cd5 ed5. Why the move 9...Nd5 is so unpopular compared to 9...ed5. Isn't it the main ... Started 01/16/05 at 07:27:54 by guest (Guest) |
7 | 5968 |
04/06/05 at 21:13:45 By: M.Nb (Guest) |
|
|
Ragozin for white: Carlsen & Dreev play Qa4+
Hi!
I was just looking up alternatives to the move order: 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 e6 3.c4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.cd5 and came across the relatively rare 5.Qa4!? I had thought such an approach was hamfisted, but I saw Dreev and Carl... Started 08/29/09 at 14:34:31 by Smyslov_Fan |
4 | 4334 |
08/30/09 at 16:18:13 By: kylemeister |
|
|
18 | 14452 |
05/13/08 at 01:09:25 By: MNb |
|
|
|
Tartakower QGD
Hello everybody,
I have a quick (and probably naive) question regarding the QGD Tartakower variation. As I've tried to choose my response as black to d4, I have looked through a couple of books ... Started 07/30/04 at 17:13:06 by Scott Rex (Guest) « Pages 1 2 all » |
17 | 19859 |
05/19/05 at 17:13:44 By: slates |
|
|
Interesting Lasker's Defence Analysis
I figured I'd share this with any of you who haven't seen it; it looks like a pretty good web article on a Lasker's Defence based repertoire. It's made me interested enough to want to give it a try!<...
Started 12/25/07 at 22:16:33 by ErictheRed |
2 | 2965 |
01/10/08 at 09:19:54 By: MarinFan |
|
|
The Ragozin QGD
You know, I like these forums a lot, but there doen't seem to be a great deal of variety of openings discussed (for instance, here it's mainly Slavs). Anyway, I'd like to know if there're any new ide...
Started 02/19/06 at 21:14:26 by ErictheRed « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
31 | 34075 |
03/18/11 at 12:39:51 By: Holbox |
|
|
QGD, typical position
I researched (NCO) a line of the QGD that goes:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Nf3 0-0 7. Rc1 h6 8. Bh4 a6 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bd3 c6 11. 0-0 Ne4 12. Bxe7 Qxe7 13. Bxe4 dxe4 1... Started 06/17/04 at 01:24:05 by kevinludwig |
1 | 2261 |
06/17/04 at 06:49:27 By: Peter Kitchen (Guest) |
|
|
Interested In The Tartakower Variation of the QGD?
Hello:
It seems to me that of all the major Slav, Queen's Gambit Declined, and Queen's Gambit systems covered here on ChessPublishing (and I know there are many), the Tartakower QGD has received ... Started 03/31/07 at 01:41:53 by Geof_Strayer « Pages 1 2 all » |
15 | 12784 |
06/29/07 at 13:58:13 By: cma6 |
|
|
How to combat the Lasker Variation?
Hi,
I hate admitting this, but the Lasker Variation (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Bg5 Be7 5.Nc3 h6 6.Bh4 Ne4) is giving me a terrible headache. I read the commentary to the Topalov-Anand world cha... Started 01/05/11 at 18:35:43 by Smyslov_Fan « Pages 1 2 all » |
26 | 26311 |
10/27/11 at 18:11:47 By: Daniel |
|
|
Suspect line in Cambridge-Springs
Hi guys! Was reading Panczyk & Ilczuk (hope got the names right!) and saw a suspect variation (although played by the likes of Reti, RUbinstein, Teichman, Ljubojevic, Smagin et al,):
1. d4 d5 2.... Started 07/05/08 at 14:25:16 by Chess_Addict |
0 | 1834 |
07/05/08 at 14:25:14 By: Chess_Addict |
|
|
What do you think of the Tartakower?
Hi friends: I did a review of the Tartakower D58 in my data base of more than 3 million games. I put an ELO of 2000 to 2500 and it gives the following: 1-0 30%-- 1/2 52%-- 0-1 18% . It has been used ...
Started 06/07/10 at 17:42:56 by Pingudon « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
35 | 27039 |
09/13/10 at 06:15:36 By: kylemeister |
|
|
Cambridge Spring still sound?
Hi chess friends. I am playing the semislav but I fear the Botvinnik and the antimoscow variations, so I am planning to face Bg5 with the Cambridge Spring. But I am concerned because very few people p...
Started 10/16/06 at 23:58:47 by Pingudon |
5 | 5318 |
11/02/06 at 17:41:18 By: Dji |
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
|
|
Normal Topic Sticky Topic Locked Topic Sticky Locked Topic Moved Topic |
 Global Announcement Locked Global Announcement Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) |
You can view Topics in this Board. You cannot post replies to Topics in this Board. You cannot start new Topics in this Board. You cannot post Attachments in this Board. You cannot start Polls in this Board. |
