(UTC) |
 |
|
| Welcome, Guest. Please Login
|
 Discussion forum for ChessPublishing.com, the opening theory site |
 |
QGD Mainline
Ragozin , Vienna, Cambridge Springs, Lasker, Tartakower [D38-39 & D50-69] (Moderators: proustiskeen, TN)
|
Topics: 72
Posts: 1058 |
 Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
 |
| Subject / Started By | Replies | Views | Last Post  |
||
 |
 |
Uhm...this site seems to lack most important lines
Is there any logical reason why the Orthodox lines (D60-D69) aren't covered at all in the d4-d5 section of the website?
It seems to cover a couple of lines, but completely lack others. The Cambr... Started 05/05/03 at 17:44:40 by Flanker |
6 | 3787 |
 06/09/03 at 03:22:28By: Kiwi |
|
|
QGD, typical position
I researched (NCO) a line of the QGD that goes:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Nf3 0-0 7. Rc1 h6 8. Bh4 a6 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bd3 c6 11. 0-0 Ne4 12. Bxe7 Qxe7 13. Bxe4 dxe4 1... Started 06/17/04 at 01:24:05 by kevinludwig |
1 | 1715 |
06/17/04 at 06:49:27 By: Peter Kitchen (Guest) |
|
|
QGD Lasker Defense 11. bxc3!?
After 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Be7 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bh4 O-O 7. e3 Ne4 8. Bxe7 Qxe7 9. Rc1 c6 10. Bd3 Nxc3, it seems that instead of the usual Rxc3, White has the interesting option of 11 bxc3!?...
Started 06/01/04 at 19:39:09 by Billy_Cember (Ex Member) |
3 | 2729 |
06/17/04 at 12:00:18 By: Billy_Cember - Ex Member |
|
 |
Short's games in NIC - Tartacower QGD
I'm desperately trying to locate an issue on NewInChess Magazine, in which Nigel Short provided long comments on two games he had played in the QGD Tartacower variation.
Anybody knows the article... Started 09/18/04 at 07:50:09 by hicetnunc |
3 | 2234 |
09/23/04 at 07:48:59 By: IMRichardPalliser |
 |
|
tartakower to avoid QGE?
ECO divides the Tatakower into:
D58 QGD, Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevski system) D59 QGD, Tartakower. D59 covers 8. cxd5, Nxd5, D58 all others, including cxd5, exd5 at some point, pos... Started 11/25/04 at 11:48:00 by mad_knight « Pages 1 2 all » |
19 | 10044 |
01/05/05 at 06:19:45 By: MNb |
|
 |
Coverage of Ragozin variation ?
Hello,
I couldn't find any coverage of the Ragozin variation (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Bb4) in the d4 d5 section, nor in the Nimzo section. What is the current assessment of the varia... Started 09/25/04 at 02:19:40 by hicetnunc |
4 | 3241 |
01/05/05 at 14:15:36 By: Markovich |
|
|
Orthodox defence
Do you know the Orthodox defence?
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bg5 o-o 6.e3 c6 7.Qc2 Nbd7 8.Rc1 a6 9.cd5 ed5. Why the move 9...Nd5 is so unpopular compared to 9...ed5. Isn't it the main ... Started 01/16/05 at 07:27:54 by guest (Guest) |
7 | 4315 |
04/06/05 at 21:13:45 By: M.Nb (Guest) |
|
|
Tartakower variation
What do you think about these lines?
8.Ae2 (Ad3) Ab7 9. A:f6 A:f6 10. c:d5 e:d5 8.Ae2 dc4 9.A:c4 Ab7 I'm studyng now this variation because i decided to change my defense agaist the 1.d... Started 07/09/04 at 04:30:18 by Max |
4 | 2404 |
04/11/05 at 08:18:36 By: cma6 |
|
|
Lasker Defense
Just a request for GM Scherbakov to update his excellent survey of the Lasker Defense from 9/04.
Also, if anyone regular places the Lasker, let's start a thread on it: 1 d4 d5; 2 c4 e6; 3 Nc3 Be7... Started 03/12/05 at 12:12:47 by cma6 |
5 | 2831 |
04/12/05 at 02:05:44 By: AM (Guest) |
|
|
Tartakower QGD
Hello everybody,
I have a quick (and probably naive) question regarding the QGD Tartakower variation. As I've tried to choose my response as black to d4, I have looked through a couple of books ... Started 07/30/04 at 17:13:06 by Scott Rex (Guest) « Pages 1 2 all » |
17 | 15428 |
05/19/05 at 17:13:44 By: slates |
|
|
Cambridge Springs
I have a reasonable book by Gambit on the Cambridge-Springs. This defence looks like an alternative to the very complex and theoretical Bg5 semi-slav.
However, if after Nbd7 by black, white plays... Started 05/17/05 at 14:05:13 by Fernando Semprun |
9 | 3801 |
05/23/05 at 22:04:13 By: TopNotch |
|
|
D55 on chesspublishing.com
Has anyone seen this on Ruslan's sight? ??? Also, does anyone know the current state of
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 d5 3. e3 e6 4. c4 Be7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Nf3 h6 7. Bxf6 (which is included under D55)? ... Started 05/23/05 at 14:43:55 by Billy Cember (Ex Member) |
2 | 1658 |
05/24/05 at 14:22:46 By: Billy Cember - Ex Member |
|
|
Tartakower against 5. Bf4?
The theory on 5. Bf4 mostly focuses on either the 6...Nbd7 or 6...c5 lines. Pardon my ignorance but why isn't the tartakower setup (1. d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 b6) played more ...
Started 02/04/05 at 08:30:09 by lnn2 |
6 | 2925 |
05/28/05 at 12:35:36 By: slates |
 |
|
Main Line Cambridge Springs
Can anybody give me any guidance about which is the best/most annoying line for Black in the Cambridge Springs after
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Nbd7 5. Nf3 c6 6. e3 Qa5 7. Nd2 (best) Bb4... Started 09/10/03 at 09:43:49 by notagmyet « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
40 | 16923 |
09/23/05 at 00:11:35 By: Smyslov_Fan |
|
|
QGD Orthodox Defence
Hello,
I am not finding the orthodox QGD (D60-D69). I am sure it is somewhere, I would expect it in the queensgambitdeclined ebook, but this stops at the lasker defence. Actually I want to p... Started 02/10/06 at 17:02:28 by adal(Guest) (Guest) |
1 | 1781 |
02/15/06 at 16:03:07 By: castlerock |
|
|
Orthodox QGD ("Semi-Slav Declined"): 5. Bg5 Be7
I've always wondered about the line 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. Bg5 Be7 (Semi-Slav Declined?!), which is a current favourite of M. Gurevich and popular at club level. imho this line has ...
Started 05/18/06 at 02:32:02 by lnn2 |
7 | 4277 |
05/20/06 at 05:45:41 By: lnn2 |
|
|
Why does QGD score so poorly?
Hi everyone,
I'm wondering why the venerable QGD, often referred to as rock solid, shows such dismal statistics for black in nearly every line. Often, black doesn't even win 15% of the games and... Started 05/09/06 at 03:34:08 by Scott Rex(Guest) (Guest) |
11 | 5428 |
06/23/06 at 02:38:34 By: Smyslov_Fan |
|
|
QGD Tartakower
Hello,
I was wondering what could be considered the main line in the Tartakower nowadays. I have the Opening for White according to Kramnik book and it advices to play 11.0-0 (after 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4... Started 03/25/06 at 16:01:32 by Joris_Pelemans « Pages 1 2 all » |
25 | 15287 |
07/12/06 at 21:18:54 By: Dragan Glas |
|
|
Tartakower Defense
I was at a used book shop and came across a work by a J. Konikowski entitled Queens Gambit Tartakower System. A rather old work but I picked it up since this defense has always intrigued me. I'M rathe...
Started 09/20/06 at 04:40:27 by Buzz |
11 | 10398 |
10/13/06 at 02:36:02 By: Pingudon |
|
|
Cambridge Spring still sound?
Hi chess friends. I am playing the semislav but I fear the Botvinnik and the antimoscow variations, so I am planning to face Bg5 with the Cambridge Spring. But I am concerned because very few people p...
Started 10/16/06 at 23:58:47 by Pingudon |
5 | 3799 |
11/02/06 at 17:41:18 By: Dji |
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
|
Normal Topic Sticky Topic Locked Topic Sticky Locked Topic Moved Topic |
 Global Announcement Locked Global Announcement Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) |
You can view Topics in this Board. You cannot post replies to Topics in this Board. You cannot start new Topics in this Board. You cannot post Attachments in this Board. You cannot start Polls in this Board. |
