(UTC) |
|
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
|
![]() Discussion forum for ChessPublishing.com, the opening theory site |
![]() |
QGD Mainline
Ragozin , Vienna, Cambridge Springs, Lasker, Tartakower [D38-39 & D50-69] (Moderators: proustiskeen, TN)
|
Topics: 72
Posts: 1060 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
QGD Orthodox Defence
Hello,
I am not finding the orthodox QGD (D60-D69). I am sure it is somewhere, I would expect it in the queensgambitdeclined ebook, but this stops at the lasker defence. Actually I want to p... Started 02/10/06 at 17:02:28 by adal(Guest) (Guest) |
1 | 1849 |
![]() By: castlerock |
![]() |
![]() |
Can we have some coverage of this variation
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Bb4+ 5.Nbd2 dxc4.
It's not covered in any of the updates or the pdf ebooks. Started 10/14/17 at 16:12:28 by befuddled |
1 | 1710 |
![]() By: BadDays |
![]() |
![]() |
QGD mainline sources for white?
Hello everyone,
It seems like all the recent repertoire books are for black, whereas authors from the white side always recommend the exchange variation or the Catalan. I'm interested in pla... Started 05/14/19 at 22:45:47 by BigTy |
2 | 1407 |
![]() By: katar |
![]() |
![]() |
D55 on chesspublishing.com
Has anyone seen this on Ruslan's sight? ??? Also, does anyone know the current state of
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 d5 3. e3 e6 4. c4 Be7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Nf3 h6 7. Bxf6 (which is included under D55)? ... Started 05/23/05 at 14:43:55 by Billy Cember (Ex Member) |
2 | 1757 |
![]() By: Billy Cember - Ex Member |
![]() |
![]() |
QGD Lasker Defense 11. bxc3!?
After 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Be7 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bh4 O-O 7. e3 Ne4 8. Bxe7 Qxe7 9. Rc1 c6 10. Bd3 Nxc3, it seems that instead of the usual Rxc3, White has the interesting option of 11 bxc3!?...
Started 06/01/04 at 19:39:09 by Billy_Cember (Ex Member) |
3 | 2856 |
![]() By: Billy_Cember - Ex Member |
![]() |
![]() |
Omit 5...h6 in the Tartakower?
Is there any drawback to playing 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 0-0 6.Nf3 b6? I don't think I've ever come across this line before without ...h6, and I was wondering if there was a problem w...
Started 07/11/16 at 06:21:00 by BobbyDigital80 « Pages 1 2 all » |
19 | 11822 |
![]() By: MNb |
![]() |
![]() |
18 | 10595 |
![]() By: MNb |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Chess Explained : The Queen's Gambit Declined
By Rizzitano
What do you think of this book ? Does it deal adequately with Ragozin and Vienna variation ? Would you recommend it on these lines ? Started 09/17/07 at 16:13:17 by bulgroz |
8 | 4318 |
![]() By: lnn2 |
![]() |
![]() |
Tartakower Defense
I was at a used book shop and came across a work by a J. Konikowski entitled Queens Gambit Tartakower System. A rather old work but I picked it up since this defense has always intrigued me. I'M rathe...
Started 09/20/06 at 04:40:27 by Buzz |
11 | 10804 |
![]() By: Pingudon |
![]() |
![]() |
The complete Ragozin by Cornette
There is a new book on the Ragozin by Matthieu Cornette/Chess evolution. Can anyone already compare it to the recent QC book by Pert?
Differences I've spotted from the excerpt: - Cornette gi... Started 06/20/17 at 11:11:49 by califax |
2 | 3934 |
![]() By: CanadianClub |
![]() |
![]() |
Pert on the Ragozin - new book from QualityChess
Hi guys, I am very excited with the new book on the Ragozin it's going to be on the market on 21th December. By Nicholas Pert for Quality Chess.
There is an excerpt available on their website, wh... Started 11/24/16 at 10:40:00 by CanadianClub « Pages 1 2 3 4 all » |
51 | 31751 |
![]() By: tony37 |
![]() |
![]() |
Suspect line in Cambridge-Springs
Hi guys! Was reading Panczyk & Ilczuk (hope got the names right!) and saw a suspect variation (although played by the likes of Reti, RUbinstein, Teichman, Ljubojevic, Smagin et al,):
1. d4 d5 2.... Started 07/05/08 at 14:25:16 by Chess_Addict |
0 | 1434 |
![]() By: Chess_Addict |
![]() |
![]() |
Lasker Defense
Just a request for GM Scherbakov to update his excellent survey of the Lasker Defense from 9/04.
Also, if anyone regular places the Lasker, let's start a thread on it: 1 d4 d5; 2 c4 e6; 3 Nc3 Be7... Started 03/12/05 at 12:12:47 by cma6 |
5 | 3009 |
![]() By: AM (Guest) |
![]() |
![]() |
Cambridge springs/ QGD / Semi-Slav sideline
I´m preparing to play the 5.Bg5 Semi-Slav and here Black can play
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 e6 5.Bg5 Nbd7 which converts into the QGD-Cambridge-Springs system. Amateur players (let´s say b... Started 10/22/11 at 11:44:42 by derdudea |
5 | 6422 |
![]() By: derdudea |
![]() |
![]() |
The Ragozin QGD
You know, I like these forums a lot, but there doen't seem to be a great deal of variety of openings discussed (for instance, here it's mainly Slavs). Anyway, I'd like to know if there're any new ide...
Started 02/19/06 at 21:14:26 by ErictheRed « Pages 1 2 3 all » |
31 | 27752 |
![]() By: Holbox |
![]() |
![]() |
Interesting Lasker's Defence Analysis
I figured I'd share this with any of you who haven't seen it; it looks like a pretty good web article on a Lasker's Defence based repertoire. It's made me interested enough to want to give it a try!<...
Started 12/25/07 at 22:16:33 by ErictheRed |
2 | 2359 |
![]() By: MarinFan |
![]() |
![]() |
Ntirlis Playing 1 d4 d5 Why no Indian move order?
Slightly over half of Nikolaos Ntirlis excellent book is about the QGD ( 9 chapters, 184 out of 335 pages ). Yet in these chapters he only discusses the move order 1 d4 d5 .
In four databases exa... Started 07/17/20 at 03:58:44 by ernie |
5 | 1050 |
![]() By: Ametanoitos |
![]() |
![]() |
Cambridge Springs
I have a reasonable book by Gambit on the Cambridge-Springs. This defence looks like an alternative to the very complex and theoretical Bg5 semi-slav.
However, if after Nbd7 by black, white plays... Started 05/17/05 at 14:05:13 by Fernando Semprun |
9 | 4105 |
![]() By: TopNotch |
![]() |
![]() |
Uhm...this site seems to lack most important lines
Is there any logical reason why the Orthodox lines (D60-D69) aren't covered at all in the d4-d5 section of the website?
It seems to cover a couple of lines, but completely lack others. The Cambr... Started 05/05/03 at 17:44:40 by Flanker |
6 | 3985 |
![]() By: Kiwi |
![]() |
![]() |
Interested In The Tartakower Variation of the QGD?
Hello:
It seems to me that of all the major Slav, Queen's Gambit Declined, and Queen's Gambit systems covered here on ChessPublishing (and I know there are many), the Tartakower QGD has received ... Started 03/31/07 at 01:41:53 by Geof_Strayer « Pages 1 2 all » |
15 | 9429 |
![]() By: cma6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can view Topics in this Board. You cannot post replies to Topics in this Board. You cannot start new Topics in this Board. You cannot post Attachments in this Board. You cannot start Polls in this Board. |