2 Knights 2 Knights
Two Knights Defence inc. Wilkes-Barre Variation [C56-C59]
(Moderators: Smyslov_Fan, trw, Jupp53)
Topics: 88
Posts: 2027
Pages Pages: 3 4 [5] 
There are no actions to perform.
 
Subject / Started By Replies Views Last Post Sort (Z-A)
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies)
4.d3 h6!?
I'm looking for material on the Two Knights with 4.d3 h6!?, intending a quick ...g6. Apart from a handful of games in the CP archive, I'm only aware of one game (Kogan - Svidler, Oakham 1992) in Pinsk...

Started 09/10/19 at 06:55:30 by Straggler
« Pages 1 2 all »
15 8155 Last Post 09/25/23 at 01:47:51
By: trw
Normal Topic
Unusual 2 knights defence
Playing against TKD
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 h6? (was '!' in error ...)
Any ideas?

Started 01/16/08 at 03:03:29 by Jurassic Pawn
3 3320 Last Post 01/17/08 at 07:49:03
By: Matemax
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies)
refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Is the Two Knights' Defense, Ng5 variation, the first opening that is winning for White?
Let's start with the Berliner Variation (Gambit) 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nd4 6.c3 b5 7...

Started 12/30/08 at 10:51:14 by sloughter
« Pages 1 2 ... 25 26 27 all »
401 221649 Last Post 02/24/09 at 20:17:05
By: Uruk
Normal Topic
C57: Two Knights': 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nd4 or 5...b5
The starting position arises after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5. Black can try 4…Nxe4 but the simple 5.Bxf7ch Ke7 6.d4! is +/= While favoring White a win is a long way off. The extra pawn requ...

Started 08/20/12 at 22:38:10 by sloughter
4 3981 Last Post 08/20/12 at 23:06:25
By: sloughter
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies)
Anti-Max Lange is a refutation?
So. I want to play the max lange, but I don't know what to play against the anti-max Lange, i.e. 5..Nxe4. Should I move on to another opening? Is there enough play in the typical lines to play for a w...

Started 03/24/10 at 02:52:39 by Reverse
« Pages 1 2 all »
28 29028 Last Post 04/18/10 at 21:47:46
By: Gambiteer
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies)
C58: New try main line Two Knights Defense
Post members here and on chess.com have argued that in the main line of the 4.Ng5 variation that White must fight to equalize after 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5ch c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Qf3---The general belie...

Started 06/06/12 at 00:21:34 by sloughter
« Pages 1 2 ... 11 12 13 all »
184 20116 Last Post 12/14/12 at 14:15:08
By: sloughter
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies)
The current statut of the Traxler
Hello everyone, my question is simple, the Traxler, a so pretty opening that has survived for long time despite his reputation, is it refuted or not? I ask that after having reading a NIC Yearbook fro...

Started 03/21/07 at 21:22:57 by ArKheiN
« Pages 1 2 3 4 5 all »
66 48006 Last Post 12/10/08 at 13:53:15
By: MNb
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies)
C57-C59: Two Knights Defence : Fritz or Ulvestad?
Hi to all!
In 2 knights Defence  Fritz line 4 Ng5 d5 5 exd5 Nd4 , and Ulvestad line 5 exd5 b5 usually merge in one unique main line : Fritz 5..Nd4 6 c3 b5 7 Bf1
Ulvestad : 5..b5 6 Bf1 Nd4 7 ...

Started 01/06/05 at 07:44:25 by photophore
« Pages 1 2 all »
22 22880 Last Post 06/20/12 at 20:12:14
By: micawber
Pages Pages: 3 4 [5] 
There are no actions to perform.
 
Normal Topic Normal Topic
Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
Locked Topic Locked Topic
Locked Topic Sticky Locked Topic
Moved Topic Moved Topic
Global Announcement Global Announcement
Locked Global Announcement Locked Global Announcement
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies)
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies)
You can view Topics in this Board.

You cannot post replies to Topics in this Board.
You cannot start new Topics in this Board.
You cannot post Attachments in this Board.
You cannot start Polls in this Board.
 
  ‹ Board Index   Top