Latest Updates:
Normal Topic C29: Vienna analysis debunked (Read 2356 times)

Re: Vienna analysis debunked
Reply #1 - 12/22/03 at 19:44:10
Post Tools
This is a bit irrelevant, as 5...Bc5 6.d4 Bb4 really is strongest.
Back to top
IP Logged
YaBB Newbies

Never met a piece sac
I didn't like

Posts: 34
Location: Golden
Joined: 04/21/03
Gender: Male
C29: Vienna analysis debunked
04/21/03 at 11:07:12
Post Tools
1. e4 e5  2. Nc3 Nf6  3. f4 d5  4. fxe5 Nxe4  5. Nf3 Bg4  6. Qe2 Ng5?  7. Qb5+! c6  8. Qxb7 Nxf3+  9. gxf3 Bxf3  10. Rg1 Nbd7  11. d4! (11. Qxc6 Rc8 and Black gets too much counterplay; instead White protects e5 and prepares for Q-side development) and now if 11...Qc8  12. Ba6, leaving 11...c5, when White has an assortment of possibilities: 12. Bb5, 12. Nb5, 12. Rg3.  
« Last Edit: 09/21/11 at 05:55:16 by Smyslov_Fan »  
Back to top
IP Logged
Bookmarks: Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo