According the statistics of my database (about 250 games) White is doing pretty well after 7.h4 Qa5 8.Bd2 and 7.h4 Nbc6 8.h5 Qa5 9.Bd2. An overview from White's point of view:
A1) 7.h4 Qa5 8.Bd2 cxd4 9.cxd4 Qa4 10.h5 (10.Qg4!?) h6 11.Rb1 Qxd4 12.Nf3
A2) 7.h4 Qa5 8.Bd2 cxd4 9.cxd4 Qa4 10.h5 Nbc6 11.Nf3 h6 12.Bd3!? or 12.Rh4!?
B) 7.h4 Qa5 8.Bd2 Qa4 9.h5 is very likely to transpose
C1) 7.h4 Nbc6 8.h5 Qa5 9.Bd2 cxd4 10.cxd4 Qa4 11.Nf3 is line A2
C2) 7.h4 Nbc6 8.h5 Qa5 9.Bd2 h6 and White has both 10.Nf3 and 10.Qg4!?
C3) 7.h4 Nbc6 8.h5 Qa5 9.Bd2 Bd7 preparing o-o-o is another idea.
In my opinion White has to keep the option Qg4 open for a while and must not be afraid to sac the d-pawn. As far as I can see, Black has no easy equality.
Of course Black can postpone Qa5 and I must say, that the transpositions are pretty bewildering.

I add some miscellaneous lines and references without Kasparov's gambit (system for Black is given in 2nd Ed. Play the French - Watson).

7.h4 Qa5 (the system I advice for Black: "don't wait") 8.Bd2 (8.Qd2 Nbc6 9.Nf3 b6 10.h5 h6 11.g4 Ba6 12.Bxa6 Qxa6 13.Ng1!? Qa4 14.Ne2 Rc8 15.f4 Suetin) Nbc6 (8...Qa4 9.Qb1!? (9.Nf3! Nbc6 10.h5 cxd4 11.Rh4 Chipov) a6 10.Nf3 Nbc6 11.Qb3 Qa5 12.h5 h6 13.Rh4 Qc7 14.Rg4 Nf5 15.Be2 Bd7 16.Rb1 b5 17.Rf4 Qd8 18.g4 Nh4 19.Kf1 Nxf3 20.Bxf3 Na5... Iordachescu-Laurain,simul Naujac 2002 ; 8...cxd4 9.cxd4 Qa4 10.Nf3 Nbc6 (10...b6 11.h5 h6 12.Qb1 Ba6 13.Qc3 Qc6= Paige-Reimlinger,Philadelphie 1993 - Watson) 11.Bc3!? b6 12.Qd3 a5 - 12...Na5!? Dom - 13.h5 h6 14.Bb2!? Gouliev-Laurain,Nancy 2003 or 14.Qd2 Wang Zili-Bareev,Erevan 1996 Ilic EE/1996 or Inf 67) 9.h5 cxd4 (9...Qa4 10.Qb1! h6!? Watson's improvment over 10....Bd7? 11.h6 gxh6 12.Nf3 ooo 13.Rxh6 Nf5 14.Rf6 cxd4 15.Bb5 Qa5 16.cxd4 Ljubojevi-Hubner,Tilburg 1987 ; 9...Bd7 10.h6 gxh6 11.Rb1! Qc7!? or 11.Nf3 ooo 12.a4 Rdg8 13.Rxh6 Nf5 14.Rf6 Qd8 15.Be3 Rg6 16.Rxf7 Be8 17.Rxf5 exf5 18.g3 Bd7 19.Qd2 Rhg8 +=) 10.cxd4 Qa4 11.Nf3 tabla position of Kasparov's gambit.

Klick: you are right. Click on Morozevich-Pelletier, August 2003 game of month. (no more game in year 2004?)
About NJ's chess forum: I admit there are many ideas in he forum and I'll try to read posts about French defense ("The Jackal Attack",...)

Dom,

Yeah, unfortunately that doesn't help me that much, but that's ok.  Hopefully I can sign up for chesspublishing soon (goldcard of course) and then I will be able to get an answer to these questions!

In the meantime I wonder if anybody else knows of a good resource for the 7.h4 Winawer?

And yes, I do comment on the www.njscf.org website.  It is a great website run by Pete Tamburro who is an awesome guy who does a heck of a job.  While he is not a master he has a tremendous love for the game and a deep historical knowledge of the development of chess in general, as well as the openings.  He is a guiding light for many aspiring chessplayers, including myself, and has helped me put the openings and my entire game into perspective...which was needed for me to improve.

Ladies and Gents,

Clearly I have peppered this forum with many comments the past several days.  I just discovered this forum and it is great!  I love it.  In fact, I believe that I am going to suscribe to chesspublishing.com because of the quality of the resources here.

That aside, I do have a question about the 7.h4 Winawer as I have had quite a soft spot for it for quite some time.

Mainly my question is ultra-general in nature.  Are there any Winawer experts that can let me know where it currently stands theoretically, what the common mistakes for white and black are, and what the critical theory lines/traps are?

If I can actually get a solid answer to this I swear I will be killing myself for not signing up with chesspublishing before now!

Later Chess Fans.

OUT