Hello, any change in opinions after one year?

i've had occasion to look at the Mac again..
@Memers
GM Finkel in CBM106 concludes that 6. Be3 gives excellent chances for an advantage, "in nearly all the lines Black experiences serious problems in the opening". Both Finkel and McDonald (on Chesspub ebooks) are largely agreed on which games constitute the critical lines but they assess them differently:
In line with 6. Be3 Ne4 7. Qg4 g5: critical game is Belov-Alavkin Sochi 2004 (the famous Shirov-Volkov is probably not best play for White) where Finkel thinks White is just winning after 24. Kd2!, while McDonald says Black has compensation. I guess the truth is somewhere in between.. Black probably has enough compensation to play OTB but not in correspondence! Finkel also likes 15. Ng5 for White.
7. Qg4 Kf8: the Goloschapov games are fairly devastating for Black, so both Finkel and McDonald seem to agree that delaying the opening of the centre is the better path: 8. a3 Bxc3 9. bxc3 Nxc3 10. Bd3 Nc6!? as in Kurnosov-Volkov. Finkel gives a number of improvements on White's play (e.g.11. h4), and considers White's attacking prospects to outweigh the lack of a pawn, while McDonald just seems enthusiastic on Black's chances (not much analysis given).
Have not looked at 7... g6 yet, but both Finkel and McDonald seem to agree that line given in Smirnov-Alavkin Sochi 2004 give White excellent chances for a win (not just an edge!).
It looks like the greedy 7... Qg4 Kf8 8. a3 Bxc3 9. bxc3 Nxc3 10. Bd3 Nc6!? is the only way left to go.