Latest Updates:
Normal Topic C26: question on KG and Vienna transpositions (Read 1787 times)
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10425
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: A brief question on KG and Vienna transpositio
Reply #1 - 01/06/05 at 18:51:59
Post Tools
Quick question, quick answer:
<Would it be ....lines?>
Yes.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alfred G.
Guest


C26: question on KG and Vienna transpositions
01/06/05 at 12:58:58
Post Tools
Hello, I have a quick question for KG and Vienna practitioners concerning a couple of minor lines that can arise via transposition from Alekhine's Defense. (I am considering shifting from 2...d5 to 2...e5 vs. 1.e4 Nf6 2.d3 owing to recent troubles)

KG:
1. e4 Nf6 2.d3 e5 3.f4

Vienna:
1.e4 Nf6 2.d3 e5 3.Nc3

Would it be accurate to state that current theory in the KG/Vienna gives no reason for Black to be particularly concerned in either of these lines? My initial review of the continuations seen in recent games in my db indicates that the Vienna line is bad at best for White and the KG line is passive, yet playable (from both sides) either as a KGD or a KGA.

Thank you for any assitance.
« Last Edit: 09/21/11 at 05:58:30 by Smyslov_Fan »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo