Dear Fernando,
would you mind posting your game with 10.Bb5? 
So far I' ve analysed the position after 9.Nc3 Qe7 a bit and came to the conclusion that 10.Kd2 could be the best move (if 
not objectively, then at least for shocking value ). I read Michael Jensen's article in CCNews and it all sounds convincing, except for 10.Kd2 Kf8!? as given by Buecker. Perhaps white can improve by 11.Re1!?
Concerning 10.Bb5, I thought it to give black the better chances after 10. ... c6 11.dc6: bc6: 12.Nd5 Qe6.
The piece sacrifice suggested by Jensen 13.0-0!? from my point of view doesn't give white enough compensation after 13. ... cb5: 14.Nf4: Nf4: 15.Bf4: 0-0! 
And  13. Nc7+ leads to a position with queen against three minor pieces, on his website TalJechin had a look at it.
Play continues 13. ... Bc7: 14.Bc4 Qe7 15.Bf7:+ Qf7: 16.Nf7: Kf7: 17.0-0.
Fritz likes that position for white but as I went deeper into the position (once with Fritz and another time analysing with an IM) I came to the conclusion that if black gets his pieces out (which I think he manages with exact play), soon white is the one who has to defend against a dangerous attack. I can't "refute" TalJechins analysis now, 
but if I remember correctly (it was over a year ago) black should play something like 17. ... Nd7!? 18.Qg4: Ndf6 19.Qf3 Bd7 20.Re1 Rhe8 21.Bd2 when TalJechin thinks white should advance his queenside majority and his chances are preferable. Instead of 20. ... The8 
20. ... Thg8!? is interesting with the idea to start play on the g-file immediately. With white's queenside still dormant 
I think it's rather him than black who should be careful.

Nice idea that 10.Kd2!?, something of an improved Rice Gambit considering the Re1 pin...

I'm not sure if you're aware of the predecessor but there's actually an earlier game with 10.Kd2, i.e:


Jerez Perez,A (2300) - Estrada Nieto,J (2340) [C39]
Barbera op Barbera (5), 1997

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4 d5 7.exd5 Bd6 8.d4 Nh5 9.Nc3 Qe7 10.Kd2 Bxe5 11.Re1 Nd7 12.Qxg4 Ndf6 13.Qg5 Bd6 14.Rxe7+ Kxe7 15.Qh6 Rg8 16.Bd3 Kd8 17.Ne4 Bf8 18.Qxf6+ Nxf6 19.Nxf6 Rxg2+ 20.Kc3 Rg1 21.Nxh7 Be7 22.Ng5 Bxg5 23.hxg5 f3 24.g6 fxg6 25.Bf1 f2 26.Kd3 Bf5+ 27.Ke2 Bxc2 28.Kxf2 Rg4 29.Be3 Bf5 30.Be2 Re4 31.Bf3 Re8 32.Bf4 Kd7 33.Rc1 Rac8 34.Be5 Rf8 35.Kg3 g5 36.Rc3 a6 37.Rb3 Rb8 38.Rc3 Rbc8 39.Rb3 g4 40.Bg2 Rb8 41.Rc3 Rbc8 42.Rb3 Rb8 43.Rc3 Rbc8 ½-½

In my opinion everything on the advantages and disadvantages on 2.f4 has been said by now. That Alumbrado and I do not agree is clear and normal.

Well, I have seen a few KG games where White has ended up getting mated on the kingside or caught in the crossfire in the middle of the board (I admit that Black doesn't often get mated directly in the Dutch, although that doesn't mean his king position is not a worry for him).
I agree though, both the KG and the Wing Gambit have pluses and minuses.  I was disputing merely the idea that the KG was based on a sound positional idea and that (by implication) the Wing Gambit was not.  Again, this does not mean that they are both sound, and it may well be that the KG is objectively better than the Wing Gambit - fact is, though, we will probably never find out for sure! 
Right, I'll shut up now as this is veering off topic! 

@MNb: There are certainly advantages to the King's Gambit over the Wing Gambit, but you fail to mention the disadvantages: for one, White's king is considerably safer in the Wing Gambit.  We know that you think nothing of weakening your king's position with an early thrust of the f-pawn (with either colour) but some of us are not so "courageous"!! 

There is quite a difference between a Black pawn on b4, hampering development of White's queen's knight, and a Black pawn on f4, inviting Black to weaken his queenside further. In the King's Gambit Accepted White has two centre pawns (centre being narrow centre) against one; in the Wing's Gambit this is not the case.
So in the King's Gambit White has an enduring lasting majority in the centre, in the Wing's Gambit this majority is only temporary.
In my opinion the similarities are only superficial.

If your ELO keeps on rising, you will meet more opponents who know how to deal with unsound gambits like the wings gambit. Will it still be fun then?
The King's Gambit though is based on a sound positional idea.

Thanks for the advice.  I will give it a try and see what happens.  Will post any interesting games if I get some.

Justin