Patrik,

The trick with my gambit line is that you have to know the analyses inside out, backwards, forwards and sideways. Because, if you fail to find a single important move for White, you can lose very easily. HOWEVER,
IF YOU KNOW THE ANALYSES, YOU WILL CRUSH YOUR OPPONENT.

  Can you privately e-mail me your game-score  against that 2200 player that you lost?

  I should mention that the Latvian Gambit, 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 f5  is just as sharp as my gambit line. In both cases you have to know the analyses. But hey, that is true about any gambit line.

  Leisebein is a good player, but he primarily plays correspondence chess. He is entitled to his opinion of course. However, I am the only man who knows the
Zilbermints Gambit theory. You should check Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Keybook, pages 229-232. Also, check Blackmar-Diemer Gambit World Magazine, #69 and #70.
These should give you a good idea about my gambit.

  I have seen Leisebein's games. When he plays my gambit as White, he gets very good results with it.
So, for him to say it is not correct, is rank hypocrisy.
If he wins  with my gambit, how dare he complain?

For some reason, the first seven moves did not come up.
They are as follows:

BLACKMAR-DIEMER GAMBIT
EUWE DEFENSE
Zilbermints Gambit


1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 exf3  5 Nxf3 e6 Euwe Defense  6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 Schiller's 1986 recommendation   8 00! Nxd4  9 Kh1! Zilbermints Gambit

"When more players discover the article"
Where can we find it? I am always interested in refutations of all sorts of gambits.

Recently I read TopNotch's analysis on a website. His claim was it 'refuted' the BDG. Naturally, I challenged him to play me on the Internet Chess Club and prove his worth. I messages him. In a few days I received a response to the effect of "Thanks, but I do not play human players anymore".

Now, TopNotch is an International Master. Why is he always chickening out of proving how good his anti-BDG analyses is in an actual game?