Of course SDO also mention 10...Qh4 and 10...Be7 - the title of their book could have been The Complete Alekhine with 1100 pages theory on 1.e4 Nf6.
They think Karpov-Alburt, Malta 1980, better for White and also 10...Be7 11.f4 Ng6 12.o-o Gavrikov-Kaunas, Lituania 1983.
After 8.o-o Be7 they mention, besides the main move 9.Nc3, also 9.Nbd2, 9.Be3, 9.b3 and 9.d5.

Thanks to SDO I can give you Vogler-Sämisch, 1951 (it is not indicated, that the game was played in Flensburg):
6...Bxe6? 7.d5 Bd7 8.dxc6 bxc6 9.Nc3 e5 10.c5 Nc8 11.Qb3 Ne7 12.cxd6 cxd6 13.Ng5 d5 14.Nce4? Nf5 15.Nf5 15.Nc3 Bd6 "and Black had reached an advantage. But White could have played better at several stages."

Sorry Viking, I have bought SDO 2nd hand for half the price and I intend to use it as my reference book for the rest of my life. Of course I will answer any question like: "what do SDO say about ....?  "
Deutsche Gründlichkeit! is all too rare these days.

This looks rather solid to me... At least I doubt that this is what should prevent me from playing 4-,Nc6.

A not so solid idea:
Bent Larsen mentions in one of his books that Sämisch(!) actually played 6-,Bxe6 in one of his games (from Flensburg) with the variation:
5.c4 Nb6 6.e6!? Bxe6  

Does any of u know the full game?!

Siebenhaar/Delnef/Ottstadt give 4...Bg4 5.Be2 Nc6 6.c4 Nb6 7.exd6 exd6 (7...cxd6 8.d5! as Black has not exd5 available)
a)8.d5 Bxf3 9.Bxf3 Ne5 10.Be2 g6 11.o-o Bg7 12.Nd2 o-o 13.Rb1 Re8 14.b3 a5 15.Bb2 Ned7 Finmark-Cafferty, corr 1964, unclear.
b)8.o-o Be7 9.Nc3 o-o transposes to 5.exd6 exd6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.Be2 o-o 8.Nf3 Nc6 9.o-o Bg4.

I have corrected the typo mentioned by Viking in the next post.

Btw;
Does the Kassiber articles cover "everything" related 4-,Nc6 or just the crazy 5.e6!? variations?

Hi

In the line 4 Nf3 Nc6 5 c4  Nb6 6 Be2 black can play
6.... Bg4 7 0-0. Here
i) 7 ... e6 allows 8 ed cd 9 d5! ed 10 ed B*f3 11 g*f3
which is supposed to be a good line for White
Perhaps better is
ii) 7... de 8. N*e5 N*e5! 9. de Bf5 leading to a game 
Korenev Panchenko mentioned in the 2nd Burguess
book.
Perhaps, Black could play 6... de at once.
lg
 

Hi Folks!

Regarding Videki's English, 'entertaining' is the appropriate term ! 
But to me, the lay-out is just horrible. Fortunately, there's a German version of the book, which is much more readable. The book is a nice overview of the Alekhine, but often very superficial (especially in the older lines).
Bagirow's classic "Aljechin-Verteidigung" from 1979 is more dependable in a lot of cases. 8)
This one has probably never appeared in English.
At least I only know of the Russian and German editions.

4 ... Nc6 is one of my favourite lines! Kaissiver calls it the Haakert-Variation. Haakert himself calls it the suicide-variation. He's been playing it for decades and most likely knows what he's talking about!
The Kaissiber-article is a must for everyone who wants to play. It contains an awful lot of stuff; yet there's still a lot to analyze. This line is fun (and sometimes horror!)
both in analysis and on the board (if you dare play it!).

After 5 c4 Nb6 6 Be2, ...Bg4 should be okay. It probably tends to transpose to the exd6-Exchange. Compare it with the line 4 Nf3 Bg4 5 Be2 Nc6!?!, when White's best is sopposed to be 6 0-0.

Flattery will always get my attention, so here I am.

Videki isn't mentioned as a source because I didn't have it: the English is so awful I couldn't bring myself to spend the money.

However, I have now got a copy, so I will see what they say. Have you looked in the Kaissiber article and seen what they say? May have more relevance than any thoughts of mine.