JEH wrote on 03/21/06 at 19:35:48:
In Gallaghers Starting Out:The Pirc/Modern he concludes after 8 a5 Qc7 9 h3 e5 10 de de "In the past this position has been assessed as favourable to White, but judging by the amount of top players willing to take the black side, this assessment must be at least questionable"
I think this is a good way to assess a variation as these are the players putting in the work to check variations that you don't see in theory!
In my last game against an international master I tried the relative unknown idea 9. Re1.
See:
1. e4, d6 2. d4, Nf6 3. Nc3, g6 4. Nf3, Bg7 5. Be2, 0-0 6. 0-0, c6 7. a4, Nbd7 8. a5, Qc7 9. Re1, e5 10. d5, cd5: 11. ed5:, a6 12. Nd2, b5 13. ab6: Nb6: 14. Nb3, Bb7 15. Ta5 and white has a simple but strong plan with Be3 - Qd2 - Tea1. It is possible that h3 has to be included.
I need to make deeper analysis to see the strength of this plan but a first draft analysis of a half hour shows me good prospects.
This does look ugly for Black! But let me draw on the same theme from our other thread; I think 9 ... Rb8 followed by 10 ... b5 might better for Black than the ... e5 strike here. Thoughts?