Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) QGD Tartakower (Read 20161 times)
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2916
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #10 - 03/30/06 at 13:40:58
Post Tools
castlerock the last time I tried I could not make anything work for Black in this line with 14.Ne5 - he is struggling to make a draw as the d-pawn usually drops off eventually.
My advice - investigate something sturdy earlier on like 12...Qd6(which Short and Lputian have both played) or maybe even 12...Re8. That puts a stop to the Ne5 ideas, it is unlikely an opening like the Tartakower will be refuted after all...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #9 - 03/30/06 at 09:00:45
Post Tools
Very true. I hope Shebakov reads this. I renewed in hope this will change. Lets see.

Coming back to the subject on hand, does anyone know of any black winning games with slates’ 14.Ne5? I would appreciate if you guys can get some games posted. Even club games are welcome. It’ll help in suggesting the general direction of analysis for my Fridz and make my Sunday a less miserable one!
  

CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2916
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #8 - 03/30/06 at 08:04:33
Post Tools
Yes I gave up subscribing to the 1.d4 d5 section a long time ago because basically there was no focus whatsoever on the classical QGD Tartakower
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #7 - 03/29/06 at 12:44:04
Post Tools
I'll second that - my subscription to Chesspub expired a long time ago, but I haven't missed many Tartakower updates if a glance at the updates info is to be believed....
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2916
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #6 - 03/29/06 at 12:22:14
Post Tools
Yes I remember looking at this line a couple of years ago - its a critical line for the Tartakower. I think it might have even been mentioned on the main ChessPublishing site (shock horror a Tartakower getting as look in instead of an a6 Slav, semi-slav or god knows what else).
I´ll have a little rant - Tartakower is one of the main classical chess openings played by all the world champions - can we have a bit of coverage on the main site!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #5 - 03/28/06 at 16:43:47
Post Tools
Sorry about that!  Luckily for me, as I said, at my level I don't have to worry about theory too much (although perversely I still like to) but when I do venture a Tartakower I go for 11...c6 without really being sure why....my QGD books (Lalic, Sadler, Janjgava) all fail to mention (predict?) 14.Ne5!? but Alfonso Romero, in his excellent but quite advanced book says of the move '...the main line here is actually 14.Ne5' whilst he is looking at the well known Topalov-Kramnik game from Linares 1998 featuring 14.Re1.   Anyway, he goes on to examine 14.Ne5 in some detail within his annotations to one of the games you mention, Zviagintsev-Kasimdzhanov, Essen 2002.  He looks at all the games you mention bar the most recent, Epishin-Upton, which featured the move I thought best when I looked at the position, 14...Bxe5.  However, I wasn't satisfied with this and wondered what had happened since - it seems Black hasn't come very far in this line yet.   There is plenty of analysis in his annotations worth looking at if you can get a copy of the book, and I think it would probably be wrong of me to say much more than that here out of respect to the author, other than to reiterate that it doesn't look great for Black.  Not disastrous, but not great.  The final thing I'll note that Romero did say was that after 23...f6?? he thought that 23...Nd7 would have retained some practical chances, but I think all Tartakower players will likely be looking for something rather better than that and at a much earlier stage of the game.....

I'll take a look at 14...Re8, thanks for that suggestion.  It wasn't mentioned by Romero.  Oh, and by the way - the chapter in which he looks at the Tartakower and this game is entitled 'The Dead Bishop'.  Ouch!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #4 - 03/28/06 at 15:42:06
Post Tools
Some more black losses.

Epishin,V (2633) - Upton,T (2285) [D58]
Gibraltar Masters Catalan Bay (2), 28.01.2004

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 0-0 6.e3 h6 7.Bh4 b6 8.Be2 Bb7 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.cxd5 exd5 11.b4 c6 12.0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5 Bxe5 15.dxe5 d4 16.exd4 cxd4 17.Na4 Qg5 18.Bg4 Qxe5 19.Nxb6 Ra7 20.Rb1 f5 21.Re1 Qf6 22.Qb3+ Kh8 23.Re6 Qf7 24.Be2 Nd7 25.Na4 Be4 26.Bc4 Qh5 27.Re1 Rc7 28.b6 Nc5 29.Qa3 Nxe6 30.bxc7 Qg6 31.f3 1-0

Khalifman,A (2698) - Beliavsky,A (2661) [D58]
FIDE GP Moscow (5.1), 05.06.2002

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 0-0 7.e3 b6 8.Be2 Bb7 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.cxd5 exd5 11.b4 c6 12.0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5 Bxe5 15.dxe5 d4 16.exd4 cxd4 17.Na4 Ra7 18.f4 Qd5 19.Rf2 Nd7 20.Rc1 Rc8 21.Rxc8+ Bxc8 22.Qc2 Bb7 23.Bc4 Qe4 24.Qxe4 Bxe4 25.Rd2 Nc5 26.Nxb6 d3 27.Nc8 Rc7 28.Nd6 Ba8 29.b6 Rc6 30.Bd5 Rxd6 31.exd6 Bxd5 32.Rxd3 Be6 33.d7 1-0

Zvjaginsev,V (2645) - Kasimdzhanov,R (2674) [D58]
Julian Borowski-A 4th Essen (1), 16.05.2002

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bg5 Be7 5.Nf3 h6 6.Bh4 0-0 7.e3 b6 8.Be2 Bb7 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.cxd5 exd5 11.b4 c6 12.0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5 Qc7 15.Ng4 Be7 16.Bf3 Rd8 17.Rc1 Ra7 18.Ne5 Qd6 19.Bg4 Ba8 20.Na4 Rc7 21.Qc2 Bb7 22.f4 c4 23.Nc3 f6 24.Qg6 1-0




  

CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #3 - 03/28/06 at 15:33:01
Post Tools
slates wrote on 03/28/06 at 08:09:36:
but 11...c6 leads to some difficulties for Black doesn't it?  I seem to remember a line given in Romero's book Creative Chess Strategy where he seemed to claim an edge for White after 12. 0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5!? - I don't have the book to hand but I think this was the line that seemed problematic in the author’s opinion - does this still represent a challenge to Tartakower players?


Interesting. Thanks for bringing up. None of the book sources I have, has reference to 14.Ne5!? I dug up a bit more and earliest I could get was Onischuck's Aeroflot 2002 win!

Onischuk,A (2655) - Rychagov,A (2544) [D58]
Moscow Aeroflot op Moscow (8), 09.02.2002

1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 0-0 6.Nf3 h6 7.Bh4 b6 8.Be2 Bb7 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.cxd5 exd5 11.b4 c6 12.0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5 Qc7 15.Ng4 Be7 16.Bf3 Rd8 17.Rc1 c4 18.Ne5 Bb4 19.Nxd5 Bxd5 20.Bxd5 Rxd5 21.Rxc4 Qd8 22.Qf3 Rxe5 23.Qxa8 Re8 24.Rfc1 Ba3 25.R1c2 Qd7 26.g3 Qxb5 27.Rc8 Bd6 28.Qb7 Rxc8 29.Rxc8+ Kh7 30.Qxf7 Qb1+ 31.Kg2 Qe4+ 32.f3 1-0

There appears to be a problem for black. But 14...Re8 may lead to equality. I can't pretend, I have a solution. I need to work on this position and may be discuss with someone who knows Tartakower. Thanks for bringing this up. No. Come to think of it you s crewed up my weekend. Grin

  

CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #2 - 03/28/06 at 08:09:36
Post Tools
Just a quick question on the Tartakower 'main line' for any afficionados - after reading this thread I was reminded that after 11.b4 it seems that 11...c6 is much more popular than 11...c5,  and yet 11...c5 was used by Kasparov against Karpov many times to gain equality - why is ...c5 so much less popular?  I have read in a couple of books that it's harder for Black to play for a win after ...c5, whereas 11...c6 preserves/enhances this option, but is that really the case or is it simply fashion that makes 11...c6 the more popular move?  I know that Sadler said in his QGD book he felt you had to a strong player to do well with 11...c5, but Lalic and Watson have both said or implied that Black gets equality (albeit 'sterile' equality) rather quickly with 11...c5.  I was just wondering - I rarely have a game follow theory past 11.b4 at my level anyway, in fact most of my Tartakowers seem to feature White playing 8.cxd5 as per the famous Fischer-Spassky game you discuss - but 11...c6 leads to some difficulties for Black doesn't it?  I seem to remember a line given in Romero's book Creative Chess Strategy where he seemed to claim an edge for White after 12. 0-0 a5 13.b5 c5 14.Ne5!? - I don't have the book to hand but I think this was the line that seemed problematic in the author’s opinion - does this still represent a challenge to Tartakower players?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
castlerock
God Member
*****
Offline


Erro Ergo Sum

Posts: 842
Location: Chennai
Joined: 02/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: QGD Tartakower
Reply #1 - 03/28/06 at 02:54:29
Post Tools
Only one game in Fischer - Spassky was Tartakower Defence. It did not involve b4. This is the move order.

1.c4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.d4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 0-0 6.e3 h6 7.Bh4 b6 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 10.Nxd5 exd5 11.Rc1 Be6 12.Qa4 c5 13.Qa3

Later on Kasparov found improvement with 13...Rc8 14.Be2 15.Kf8 and the pin was no longer important. This is perhaps the reason why this line fell out of favour.

In the line you provided, of course, 11.b4 is the main move and logically so. Idea of Bxf6 and surrendering double B is to clamp c5. Black can play c5 directly but black would be just playing for a draw. At lower level technical superiority will decide the issue. 11.0-0 will transpose in most cases after white plays b4. 11.0-0 makes 11...c6 unattractive and probably that's the reason. Kramnik is the numero uno in 11...c6 lines as black and probably he wants to avoid it as white!

If you want to discuss any specific lines, I would be interested.

  

CastleRock
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joris_Pelemans
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 5
Location: Leuven
Joined: 04/09/05
QGD Tartakower
03/25/06 at 16:01:30
Post Tools
Hello,

I was wondering what could be considered the main line in the Tartakower nowadays. I have the Opening for White according to Kramnik book and it advices to play 11.0-0 (after 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 e6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bg5 0-0 6.e3 h6 7.Bh4 b6 8.Be2 Bb7 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.cxd5 exd5) without mentioning any alternative. On the net (and I think also in some games in Fischer-Spassky) I seem to find 11.b4 a lot more though. Has there been a serious improvement for black (I must admit that Kramnik-Khalifman, Linares 2000 doesn't seem so convincing to me either, but I do not have an annotated version of this game, so maybe there are improvements??) which made people switch to 11.b4 or is it just fashion? If 11.0-0 is considered as inferior now, where can I find some more info on 11.b4 on the internet? Which games are typical of this variation?

Thanks in advance,

Joris
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo