HgMan wrote on 07/16/06 at 13:54:16:
Well, I offered a provocative idea, and nobody replied. It seems as though we've lost our audience to the other games...
In my own case the other games have definitely been a serious distraction, as I'm playing both of them.
Quote:...18.Bd3 Nec6
This might be a little desperate and may well turn out to be one of those tempting "?!" moves--it just looks wrong--but I'm drawn to it. I think White needs to take on c6 or else Black is able to activate his position more effectively. And while I don't want to exchange down to an endgame with my bad bishop (more passive than bad, maybe), the removal of one pair of knights should give me a little more space...
Somehow I thought this likely to lead into similar lines to 18...Nac6: e.g., (18...Nec6) 19.c3 (other moves are possible, but I don't really like 19.Nxc6) 19...Nxd4 20.Nxd4 when 20...Nc6 would transpose to 18...Nac6 19.c3 Nxd4 20.Nxd4 Nc6. Of course, 20...Nc6 is not obligatory - there are other ways to deploy the knight and it need not move from a5 immediately. I also didn't see any real danger inherent in 18...Nec6 (the a5-knight has no retreat at the moment, but that 'problem' will be immediately remedied).
I guess I missed the idea behind 18...Nec6; it looked like a perfectly good move, but not so different from 18...Nac6 in where it's likely to lead.