Quote:I suggest a comparison with the Modern defence might be helpful. It was found that instead of 1 e4 g6 2 d4 c6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 f4 d5 5 e5 etc, apparently wasting a tempo by 1 e4 g6 2 d4 c6 3 Nc3 d6!? 4 f4 d5!? 5 e5 etc was better, since the bishop is not very effective on g7 when faced by the d4/e5 pawn centre and has better prospects on the a3-f8 diagonal (eventually).
Also compare with the French - I can't think of many lines in which White has set up the "Advance" centre where it would be appropriate for Black to fianchetto the king's bishop.
Interesting points worth further thought especially your first paragraph Paddy, but I think I for now have a slightly differing view on the subject. I am not very familiar with the Modern defence but I am very familiar with the French which I have been playing for over 10 years.
The actual fact is that Bg7 in the french can be a quite good piece and is not that uncommon. It can get to g7 in both theoretical lines of the Tarrasch and Advance. From there it pressurizes the white pawn-chain e5-d4 which can be quite annoying for white if the e5-pawn is undermined, for instance by f6.
I agree that if white gets f2-f4 in first Bg7 might not be a great piece, but in the Advance French white doesn't get to play this comfortably. I doubt that white gets to play f4 with any advantage in the c3-Sicilian either. F2-f4 or not f2-f4 seems to be the central issue here for whether Bg7 is ok or not.
Quote:Having said that, I'n not completely sold on Sveshnikov's verdict that it is a clear improvement for White to play 1 e4 c5 2 c3 g6 3 Nf3! Bg7 4 d4 cxd4 5 cxd4 d5 6 e5 - OK, so the bishop is not great at g7, but on the other hand White has committed the knight to f3 early and maybe Black can take advantage of this.
I wouldn't be too worried about my Bg7 here for the very same reasons you mention in your last sentence and I above.
TimS: I feel there certainly is potential to a bishop placed on g7, it might be the weakened dark squares that give people second thoughts.