Yet another twist in the dedate over this variation:
[Event "Moscow Open 2007"]
[Site "Moscow, RUS"]
[Date "2007.01.30"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Kornev, Alexei(RUS)"]
[Black "Geller, Jakov(RUS)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B47"]
[WhiteElo "2578"]
[BlackElo "2501"]
[PlyCount "66"]
[EventDate "2007.??.??"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Ndb5 Qb8 7. Be3 a6 8.
Bb6 axb5 9. Nxb5 Bb4+ 10. c3 Ba5 11. Nc7+ Qxc7 12. Bxc7 Bxc7 13. Qg4 Kf8 14.
Bd3 Nf6 15. Qe2 h5 16. O-O g5 17. a4 b6 18. b4 Bb7 19. f3 Ne5 20. Bb5 h4 21.
Qe3 h3 22. g3 g4 23. Qg5 Rh5 24. Qxf6 Bd8 25. fxg4 Bxf6 26. gxh5 Bg5 27. Kf2
Ng4+ 28. Ke2 Bxe4 29. Bd3 Bg2 30. Rfb1 Nxh2 31. a5 bxa5 32. bxa5 Ng4 33. a6 h2
{Black wins 0-1} 0-1
http://www.jinchess.com/chessboard/pos=r1b2knr/1pbp1ppp/2n1p3/8/4P1Q1/2P5/PP3PPP... position after 13...Kf8!?
This move is disregarded in all sources I have (Delchev/Semkov, Rizzitano, Sommerbauer), however Geller comes with a new plan of attacking with the g and h pawns - which works very nicely here (confirming my belief that playing an automatic 13...g6 and followed by ...0-0 is just too passive in this variation).
after 22...g4
http://www.jinchess.com/chessboard/pos=r4k1r/1bbp1p2/1p2pn2/1B2n3/PP2P1p1/2P1QPP... I would gladly take black's position, and 23.Qg5? is either desperation or miscalculation after which white looks lost.
Still I wonder what Geller planned against 14.f4