It seems Marin learned something from writing 'Beating the Open Games' 


Marin,M (2549) - Brunello,S (2468) [C36]
1st Quality Rapid Edinburgh SCO (2.3), 11.03.2007

1.f4 e5 2.e4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 4.exd5 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nxd5 6.Nxd5 Qxd5 7.d4 Bd6 8.c4 Bb4+ 9.Kf2 Qd8 10.c5 c6 11.Bc4 0-0 12.Bxf4 Be6 13.Bxe6 fxe6 14.Bd6 Rf6 15.Be5 Rf7 16.Qb3 Ba5 17.Qxe6 Nd7 18.Rhf1 Nxe5 19.Qxe5 Bc7 20.Qe4 Bxh2 21.Rh1 Qc7 22.Qh4 Qf4 23.Rxh2 Qd2+ 24.Kg1 Qe3+ 25.Kh1 h6 26.Re1 Qd3 27.Qe4 Qc4 28.Qe6 1-0

Dragonslayer wrote on 03/12/07 at 16:00:35:


what's the third one?

Quote:


there are two in progress

kalle99 wrote on 03/09/07 at 13:35:20:


See my previous post, first link. Bad reading, Kalle!  

Books:
Thomas Johansson's The King's Gambit for the Creative Aggressor.
I do not think too high of McDonald's Swashbuckling King's Gambit, but he has some decent stuff on 3...d6 4.d4 g5 5.h4.
Bücker's The new King's Gambit (I own the Dutch version) investigates 3...d6 4.Bc4 transposing to the Hanstein Gambit.
I am also pretty sure that there are other sources.


Alesab wrote on 03/09/07 at 10:59:21:


See Johansson's The Fascinating King's Gambit on 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 Nf6 for some interesting new ideas to give Black a difficult life.
Fischer has not demolited the King's Gambit, but only the Hanstein Gambit. And he has not even demolited that one - Alapin did.
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 (4.d4 g5 5.Nc3 / 5.h4 see other threads) h6 5.d4? (5.d3 and 5.b3 see Johansson's Creative Aggressor) g5 =+ 6.0-0 (6.g3) Bg7 7.c3 (7.g3 Bh3) Nc6 8.g3 (8.Qa4) g4?! (Fischer's recommendation, but it is inferior to Bh3!) 9.Nh4 f3 and now both 10.Bf4 and 10.Qb3 offer quite good compensation.
Fischer's "bust" is even more outdated than Spielmann's From the sickbed.

Markovich where on this forum can you read about the Fischer defence ? Can you give me ANY other good source (book or video) where you can study the Fischer defence ? Answer this. (exept Fischers analysis). Answer if you can. But you CANT!!! McDonald have a verdict in his book who was written almost 10 years ago.

I have looked in different books. Unfortunately there are mostly pro white kings gambit books  in the shops. The repertoire books that exist have chosen something else to defend against the kings gambit.

SO therefor I have asked this forum. I can see in other threads that there are people ON THIS forum who have played the kingsgambit for 25 years!!! They must know something. I have not suceeded in finding an answer about the status of the Fischer defense. Is that a naive question 'MR Know how' Markovich?

By the way..... thank you for giving me more fuel to ask "naive" questions. More questions will follow.

And you dont sit with the answer to what is a naive question or not. 

There is a good saying :

There are no stupid questions...just stupid answers. 

And your answer was MORE than stupid. You are also mentioned as unfriendly by an another member of this forum. I dont ask for your reference because you dont have the brain for it.

So try to be more friendly you idiot.

I meet fire with fire..........and you started.

Hi. I'd like to reuse this topic to show that the fischer line after

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. Bc4 h6 5. 0-0 g5 6. d4 Bg7 7. c3 Nc6 

colud be obteined with the Bishop's Gambit move order too, after...

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nc6! 4. Nf3  (4. d4 Nf6!!) 4...g5 5. d4 Bg7 6. 0-0 d6 7. c3 h6

so, my question is, has fischer demolited Bishop's Gambit too ??
Is the resulting position after h6 so bad for white????
Is Qb3 really the white best move here????
What about a rapid g3?

kalle99 wrote on 03/08/07 at 23:20:32:


Enough with innumerable naive questions, already!  Questions that a ten-year-old could ask, you know?  Do you know how to search past threads?  This community is not your $0-per-hour chess instructor, for crying out loud.  Put some time into the game, do some research, and come here with some well-informed questions. 

And come here with the concerns of a player and not an annonymous interrogator who just wants to suck up people's chess knowledge.  Buy some books, if you want to learn about this game.  I'm not your reference material.