On 1 c4 I usually play g6 , and , if White plays d4 sooner or later , I get a KID
Now , if he plays only d3 , Black has the choise between a Leningrad set-up , if W does not play e4 , and a Benoni / Closed Sicilian set-up , where the White set-up is not optimal

Ok MNb. Thx.

Quote:
, that's the position, reversed, i was talking about, however I'm not sure I like a4 (...a5) and Re1 (...Re8). Should this be the best try? I mean if black plays ...Nf6 before ...f5, but his idea is attack in the king's side this is a considerable lose of time considering the position isn't defined in the center. 

Pd. In the game I was hoping for x.d4 and play a Fianchetto KID Simagin Variation

Maybe. Ribli-Andersson, Skara 1980 (topplayers then) saw 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 d6 6.Nf3 Nf6 7.0-0 Rb8 8.a4. There are also the famous games Spassky-Geller, Candidate match 1968 (Spassky included f2-f4 of course).

You might take a look at the Closed Sicilian as well: about the same positions, colours reversed.

There are some specilized books on English with 1...e5 that covers these lines, for instance the one by Carsten Hansen. That and similar books are more about moves than ideas, though.

White can play these lines in different ways. One way is to play Nf3, g3, Bg2, 0-0 and launch an attack on the queen's side with b4 as soon as possible. Another way is to play c4, d3, e4, g3, Bg2, Nge2, 0-0 with a Botvinnik set up. The center is quite firm and white can play on both wings (or for d4 if possible). White can also try d3, e3, Nge2 structure which is more fluid.

If white does not play d4 or e4, black can often quickly get e5 and f5 in, but since the center is not fixed, a flank attack has to be careful, otherwise white strikes in the center.