(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › King's Indian › Classical › Theoretically Challenging Lines
(Moderators: trw, Bibs)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Theoretically Challenging Lines (Read 9893 times)
HgMan
God Member
*****
Offline


Demand me nothing: What
you know, you know

Posts: 2330
Location: Up on Cripple Creek
Joined: 11/09/04
Gender: Male
Re: Theoretically Challenging Lines
Reply #1 - 05/23/07 at 01:19:54
Post Tools
For White or for Black?   

For Black, 7...Nc6 is definitely not the only way to play the KID, and many on this list will tell you that 7...Na6 is perfectly viable.

For White, I still have a soft spot for the Saemisch, and I suspect that White will find ways to confront 6...c5 and make Black's life miserable.

As White, I must confess that I do play the line you mention and head for the Bayonet, but I used to play the Saemisch.  I'd recommend reading through some old threads on this forum for some ideas...
  
"Luck favours the prepared mind."  --Louis Pasteur
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
exigentsky
Senior Member
****
Offline


Q

Posts: 402
Joined: 05/14/07
Theoretically Challenging Lines
05/23/07 at 00:01:05
Post Tools
Does it seem like there are ANY possibly potent lines in the King's Indian apart from the following?
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 e4 d6 5 Nf3 O-O 6 Be2 e5
7 O-O Nc6 8 d5 Ne7

I don't mean lines that are annoying, I mean lines that could be objectively very strong. Could the fianchetto lines pose a serious theoretical challenge?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge