Yes,but now we discuss it here!
"
I don't think you need be too pessimistic about Black's winning chances even against strong opposition. It all depends on your opponent's style really. While it is true that there are several lines which promise White a comfortable edge with little risk, some players (including strong ones) will try and refute you outright by keeping the pawn in the line 4. Bf4 Ktc6 ; 5. Ktf3 Bb4+ ; 6. Ktc3 Qe7 ; 7. Qd5 or opting for sharp play with Alekhine's 4. e4. Here, Black will be in more danger, but will also get more chances of emerging ahead. Furthermore, even in the ultra-solid lines such as 4. Bf4 Ktc6 ; 5. Ktf3 Bb4+ ; 6. Ktd2 there is room for outplaying your opponent with greater familiarity of the positions as Scholar's subtle analysis has demonstrated in an older thread."
1.I tried to improve the line with Bf4 and not to take the pawn .I workt at that a few weeks and it seems,that black just has to take the pawn to have some counterchances,but than there is a line which is forced and ends up in a better endgame for white.
I think this line is maybe some kind of a refutation of the BpG
2.e4 is not such a good move!black scores quite well in this line!White has not so much chances and in my opinion e4 is = or even =+.
3. In the line Bf4 Nd2 is not really a good move,because it allows black to start an attak.
I dont want to show you why e4 is not so good or how to attak after Nd2,because I dont have enough time to write that down.
But after a hard work on the BpG for over 4 years,not only by myself ,but also with the help of the strongest computers like Rybka I can say ,that only the line with Bf4;Nc3 gives white an advantage.
You can prove it yourself ,if you have a few years time
Pages: [1] 
Why does no Top-Player play the Buderpester GAmbit (Read 18413 times)
