Quite a while ago now I made (as a Word file) the doc shown below. I haven't looked at it since and I'm not sure how it will copy here, but here it is in case it's of any use (probably not much, as it seems to cover only positions with c2-c3 in; still, even here the alternatives and the transpos are rather boggling). Parenthetical numbers in the text refer to the Notes below.

*****


Modern Steinitz Move Orders


I  With 5/6/7 …Nf6 (i.e. Black has played …Nf6 by move 7, delaying …Bg7)

(a)  with 5 …Nf6

5 0-0 Nf6(1) 6 c3 Bd7 7 d4(2) g6 → 8 Re1(3) b5(4) 9 Bb3 Bg7


(b)  with 6 …Nf6(5)

5 0-0 Bd7 6 c3 Nf6(6) 7 d4 g6 → 8 Re1 b5 9 Bb3 Bg7

5 0-0 Bd7 6 d4 Nf6(7) 7 c3(8) g6 [Parma–Keres] → ditto.

5 c3 Bd7 6 d4 Nf6 7 0-0(9) g6 → ditto.


(c)  with 7 …Nf6

5 0-0 Bd7 6 c3 g6 7 d4 Nf6 → 8 Re1 b5 9 Bb3 Bg7



II  With 9 …Nf6 (i.e. Black completes his fianchetto on move 7, delaying development of his KN)

5 0-0 Bd7 6 c3 g6 7 d4 Bg7(10) → 8 Re1(11) b5(12) 9 Bb3(13) Nf6

5 c3 Bd7 6 0-0 g6 7 d4 Bg7 → ditto.

5 c3 Bd7 6 d4 g6(14) 7 0-0 Bg7 → ditto.



Notes

  1. 5 ..g6?! 6 d4! (Taylor 22).
  2. Fogarasi–Davies featured a rare, irrelevant transposition of White’s 7th and 8th moves.
  3. Alternatives, in this position with …Nf6 in rather than …Bg7, are: (1) 8 d5; (2) 8 Bg5 b5! 9 Bb3 Bg7 [T 75]; (3) 8 Bc6; and (4) 8 Nbd2.
  4. There is of course nothing wrong with the immediate 8 …Bg7 here, transposing to 8 …Nf6 in note 12.
  5. All mentioned by Taylor at p. 74.
  6. T (11, 41, 54–6, 58–9, 64) says 6 …Nge7 (the Rubinstein Variation) is interesting here with White having castled, but inferior after 5 c3 Bd7 6 d4 because of 7 Be3! (7 …Ng6 8 h4!).
  7. Here Kuljasevic at Modern Chess (Ch. 2) gives instead (though without suggesting Black needs to avoid the next note) 6 …ed 7 Nd4 b5 8 Nc6 Bc6 9 Bb3 Nf6, when Leko–Mamedyarov continued 10 Nc3 Be7 11 Re1 0-0.
  8. Or: (1) 7 Bc6 Bc6 8 Re1 Be7 9 Nc3 ed! 10 Nd4 Bd7 (Stellwagen–Tomashevsky) (T game 71, pp. 221–3); (2) 7 de Ne5! (T 8, 223).
  9. 7 Qe2 Be7! (T 93).
  10. T (23, 75) says 7 …Bg7 here (iso 7 …Nf6) is inferior because of 8 Bg5, but he doesn’t even mention 8 …f6 as given by Kuljasevic (Ch. 8), considered OK for Black.
  11. Alternatives, in this position with …Bg7 in rather than …Nf6, are: (1) 8 d5; (2) 8 Bg5; (3) 8 Be3; (4) 8 de; and (5) 8 h3.
  12. Of course, Black can also play 8 …Nge7 and 8 …Nf6 here, the latter being Kuljasevic’s recommendation (Ch. 10).
  13. See T 76, 81, 82. For 9 Bc2 here see T 76.
  14. T (87, 93) says 6 …g6 here (iso 6 …Nf6) is inferior because of 7 Bg5, but Kuljasevic (Ch. 8) gives 7 …f6 8 Be3 Nh6 9 0-0(!) Bg7, transposing to 8 Bg5 f6 in note 10.

kylemeister wrote on 08/26/23 at 18:50:12:


Thanks emary and Kylemeister for the additional resources. After move 9, Kuljasevic writes:

"Black is not thrilled about having to play Bd7. As we will see in 6.d4 
exd4 7.Nxd4 variation, he would much rather play c6-c5 and Bb7 to 
quickly obtain counterplay in the center. Yet, we will see that even in 
this apparently passive position black has sufficient resources for 
counterplay."

GM Matthias Wahls has done a free video about the "Steinitz Deferred" 
at his youtube-channel: 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbfd2AtRqgANVBvpEo85kw ;
(Have a look at the second row of the video-list.)

Wahls tries to prove a  White advantage against 
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 with an early ...d6. ,
He investigates a few plausible White tries for an advantage. 
Wahls concludes that in most cases a well prepared Black player can get interesting equality.   
Nethertheless Wahls thinks there is a way to a slight White advantage 
(but not more than that). 

If someone studies the course of Gawain Jones 
then a crossreading with Wahls' video could be interesting early on.

FreeRepublic wrote on 08/25/23 at 17:26:33:

Incidentally the first alternative reminded me of (yes, an old game) Karpov-Spassky 1986. I notice that Demchenko (who has figured prominently in Chess Publishing coverage of some ...Nge7 stuff) has followed in Spassky's footsteps with 9. Be3 O-O 10. Nbd2 Qe8 11. Bb3 b6. In a 1986 book, Raymond Keene and David Goodman described that as "a curious move that seems to serve no apparent purpose." (I recall thinking maybe it could serve to prevent Bc5 after an exchange on e5.)

Michael Ayton wrote on 08/24/23 at 13:02:44:


That is my conclusion as well.

After 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O d6 6. d4, Michael states "Black can, should he wish, avoid the 6 ...b5 7 de ending with 6 ...Bd7 (i.e. transpose into 4 ...d6 5 0-0 Bd7 6 d4 Nf6!)." 

The ending after 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O d6 6. d4 b5!? 7. de5 de5 8.Qd8 Nd8 9. Bb3 is perfectly good for Black. However, you might not want an ending.

Instead after 6...Bd7 we get to a position covered by Tim Taylor (from 4...d6) in three games (Tal-Ivkov, Stellwagen-Tomashevsky, and Hermlin-Keres) with analysis of additional 7th moves.



Taylor covers several moves for white, but not 7d5. I like 7d5 because White will later be able to play c4 in one move. After 7d5, Black can consider ...Nb8 in addition to ...Ne7.

AOC mentions 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 5. c3 Bd7 6. d4 g6 7. Bg5!?. Kuljasevic continues with 7...f6 8Be3 Nh6 with interesting play.

AOC also mentions 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 5. c3 Bd7 6. d4 Nf6 7. Qe2. Now 7... Be7 8. O-O O-O is an option. It should be noted that such natural moves as 9Rd1 or 9Nbd7 can be answered by 9...Nxd4! with advantage to Black. 7...b5 can also be tried. As AOC notes, Black may not be able to play ...g6. Interesting play seems to be the constant result.

Michael Ayton wrote on 08/24/23 at 13:02:44:

Is that the case? After 4...Nf6 5.Qe2 black is usually advised to play more actively with ...Bc5, or else ...Be7 and later ...d7-d5 in one go. 5...d6 6.c3 Bd7 looks very passive, 7.d4 Be7 8.Nbd2 black already has to take evasive measures, and white scores almost 100% in the database. 7...g6 is more interesting, but hardly played, there may be a concrete reason. This also calls into question whether black can get the ...Nf6 ...d6 ...g6 setup via 4...d6, for example 4...d6 5.c3 Bd7 6.d4 now if 6...Nf6 7.Qe2, while if 6...g6 7.Bg5!?.

Michael Ayton wrote on 08/24/23 at 13:02:44:

Another old book move is 8...Ne7. Back in the '70s it was given as "!" by Larsen (annotating Hartston-Olafsson, a near-miniature won by the Icelandic lawyer) and played a couple of times by Keres.