Normal Topic Vigorito's Semi-Slav (Read 2465 times)
casper
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 04/18/08
Re: Vigorito's Semi-Slav
Reply #2 - 04/18/08 at 17:04:06
Post Tools
YES!!! Thank you. I went for the short term gain.Once a patzer always a patzer. Smiley
Bye
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: Vigorito's Semi-Slav
Reply #1 - 04/18/08 at 16:44:21
Post Tools
casper wrote on 04/18/08 at 16:34:10:
At the risk of sounding dumb can someone explain the reasoning behind the White move Qh5+ in page 118 a11? Can't Black play ...g6? 
15. Bxg6 hxg6  16. Qxh8
Is the Rook and a pawn sufficient compensation for a Knight and a Bishop?
This is my first post so any suggestions as to how to communicate better would be appreciated.

tks

Hi Caspar,
have a nice time on the Forum!

I think: 
14.Qh5+ g6 15.Bxg6+ hxg6 16.Qxg6+ Ke7 17.Bg5+ +- should be the solution
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
casper
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 04/18/08
Vigorito's Semi-Slav
04/18/08 at 16:34:10
Post Tools
At the risk of sounding dumb can someone explain the reasoning behind the White move Qh5+ in page 118 a11? Can't Black play ...g6? 
15. Bxg6 hxg6  16. Qxh8
Is the Rook and a pawn sufficient compensation for a Knight and a Bishop?
This is my first post so any suggestions as to how to communicate better would be appreciated.

tks
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo