@ linksspringer

Pumi doesn't own it but after reading this, the book is in order now
Thanks.

@ all

I found something interesting here:www.chessmix.com/en/eshop/ebooks/

Quote:

You are heartly invited to my home and "Play the Chaos" with my kids (6 yrs, 4 yrs, 1/2 yrs) 

pumi wrote on 06/24/08 at 02:09:33:


White has no special problems after 7...Qa5 8.Qc2 (for example, 8...Nf6 9.fxe4 Nxe4?! 10.Bd3), and eventually Black will come to regret this placement of his queen.

I understand that Black "dominates" e5 after 7.f3 Nf6 8.Qc2 d6 9.fxe4 Nbd7 10.Nf3 Ng5 and so forth (or similar), but in the absence of anything concrete to the contrary from fluffy, I will maintain my view that Black can look forward to trouble on the kingside.  An opinion based on vastly less talent and experience than fluffy's, I freely admit.

drkodos wrote on 06/20/08 at 19:28:03:


Looks like a tranposition to the Clarendon Court defence upon which there is also a video by Johnathan Levitt. A very good surprise weapon indeed as I mentioned in some other threads.

Toppy

Postscript: The theoretical recommendation to Markovich's 6.e4! is 6...fxe4 7.f3 Nf6!? 8.fxe4 d6!? intending Nbd7 and Ng4 with a firm grip on the critical e5 square. Instead of 7.f3 the move 7.h4!? is also considered critical.

I seem to recall Johnathan Rowson claiming somewhere to have more or less refuted this defence, and I'm pretty sure it has something to do with an e4 gambit at some point, so perhaps Markovich is on to something.   

NIC Yearbook 59 has an slightly euphoric article on the Chaos Attack "An A-OK line" about 6.h4. It also mentions 6.g4 and 6.e4 (but no games) as further White tries.

Just one sentence from the introduction: "We feel that Garry would rather be Black here!" - well thats advertising 

pumi, thanks for the comments, but sorry I am not really interested in analyzing 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.e4 d6 4.Nc3 f5. it is off topic and clearly inferior imho.

I will say that after 6.h4, 6...Nf6 is not the only move.

@kylemeister

I take my ideas from this forum , ECO, different databases as chess base, chess assistant and......,but you will not find a lot of material about the "chaos" we are talking about.
So you face a huge field for proper thoughts and that's exactly what I like.

Second:What is written today can be refuted tomorrow. Look for example the april update in this forum, where i find a strong idea OTB in the owen defense with 8.Nb5 and 9.Qg4. Before this, black had an equal position and even some IM's gave the variation some exclamation marks.
So, what is equal ? What is slightly better ??

Third: Don't we all make the same mistake in just looking for variations with a clear advantage for the colour we like to play and where an equal position after x moves is allready critical ?

I have a deep respect for fluffy, not because he is on my side in this topic , but for his original analysis in his latest works. 
In his books, we see also unclear, slightly better or critical conclusions.
So when he writes: come on it's a clear += , I like to know why and where I missed something.