Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Veresov: Refutation? (Read 27500 times)
dmp4373
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 99
Joined: 03/04/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #24 - 08/05/08 at 01:28:17
Post Tools
If players in this section were looking for what's best, they wouldn't be looking in this thread, or even in this section! Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #23 - 08/04/08 at 14:59:08
Post Tools
Macca wrote on 08/04/08 at 07:32:59:
So, 4.f3 it is then.

Always follow your instincts!


Yes, don't listen to Prié when he says that 4. Qd3 is probably best ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dmp4373
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 99
Joined: 03/04/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #22 - 08/04/08 at 14:56:17
Post Tools
Macca wrote on 08/04/08 at 07:32:59:
So, 4.f3 it is then.

Always follow your instincts!


I've been looking at this also recently and have come to the conclusion that this is one of those opening lines that gets negative publicity, but offers White an opportunity. By that I mean its value is its obscurity while giving White something sharp to work with. 

The lines I'm looking at allow Black easy equality and maybe even a slight advantage, but the White side is easier to play and because Black so rarely sees it, White will be far better prepared for moves 12-20. And that's where he gets the advantage. For the opening purest that's bad strategy, but for practical reasons it works well in OTB play.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Macca
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 11/07/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #21 - 08/04/08 at 07:32:59
Post Tools
So, 4.f3 it is then.

Always follow your instincts!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3185
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #20 - 07/31/08 at 17:06:26
Post Tools
Macca wrote on 07/30/08 at 09:46:19:

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bg5 Nbd7 4.Qd3 is OK for White

Eric's July update arrives just in time! Wink
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3185
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #19 - 07/30/08 at 11:56:07
Post Tools
Isn't the A-Z of the Veresov already covered on ChessPublishing? Eric considers 4 e3 to be a little dubious, if I understand correctly. Wink
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
TimS
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 458
Location: London
Joined: 11/02/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #18 - 07/30/08 at 10:22:21
Post Tools
realpolitik wrote on 07/29/08 at 18:17:12:
sorry yes it was rizzitano i meant. well against 4e3 black can play e6 and c5, doubt if white can claim an advantage here. and after 4Qd3 rizzitano suggests 4...h6 5Bh4 e6 6e4 de 7Nxe4 Be7 with a fairly level position.

My game followed such a line, albeit by transposition: 4.e3 c5 5.Nf3 e6 6.Be2 (6.Bd3 c4 didn't look very promising) Be7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Re1 (my plan was to complete development ahead of Black and then advance in the centre, but Black forestalled this by going in for exchanges) 8...h6 9.Bh4 Ne4 10.Bxe7 Nxc3 (10...Qxe7!?) 11.Bxd8 Nxd1 12.Raxd1 (enough for a small edge, in my view, but Fritz11 much prefers 12.Be7) 12...Rxd8 13.dxc5 Nxc5 14.c4 += Spanton (2007) - Bodenstein (2062), Oberjoch 2008.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Macca
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 7
Joined: 11/07/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #17 - 07/30/08 at 09:46:19
Post Tools
I wasn't going to join in as there's an older thread on early moves in the Veresov. However, as I'm bored at "work": 

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bg5 Nbd7 4.Qd3 is OK for White - after B plays e6 then dxe in response W's e4 we have a French Burn, hardly dangerous for White even after the slightly odd Qd3. 

4.f3 is more interesting though, and although 4...c6 with ...e5 in mind is a good response, so long as White is aware of dangerous Black ideas such as ...Ba3 there are some double-edged variations not in the books which White can employ that, although objectively may be a little better for Black, are so complicated that the better prepared player (White!) has good chances of an advantage. Don't expect to see them at Hector's level though...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
realpolitik
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 66
Joined: 01/15/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #16 - 07/29/08 at 18:17:12
Post Tools
sorry yes it was rizzitano i meant. well against 4e3 black can play e6 and c5, doubt if white can claim an advantage here. and after 4Qd3 rizzitano suggests 4...h6 5Bh4 e6 6e4 de 7Nxe4 Be7 with a fairly level position.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #15 - 07/29/08 at 17:20:08
Post Tools
TimS wrote on 07/29/08 at 17:12:04:
realpolitik wrote on 07/29/08 at 16:53:21:
I used to play the Veresov occasionally, then I realised that its just not very good. White needs to find something against 1d4 d5 2Nc3 Nf6 3Bg5 Nbd7 4f3 c6 with the idea to play a quick e5. was interesting to see this recommended by vigorito in his repertoire book for black against d4

I think 4.f3 is premature. Last time I played the Veresov, which was last month, I preferred 4.e3 (and was gratified to find afterwards it's recommended by Nigel Davies in his Veresov book).


Hmm, no love for Jonny.  One might think that he's probably the strongest player who regularly (though not all the time) plays the Veresov, and he seems to reliably play 4. Qd3, therefore there should be a good chance that it's the best move.

BTW, that line recommended by Rizzitano (if that's what you meant) has been the main line against 4. f3 for decades.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TimS
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 458
Location: London
Joined: 11/02/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #14 - 07/29/08 at 17:12:04
Post Tools
realpolitik wrote on 07/29/08 at 16:53:21:
I used to play the Veresov occasionally, then I realised that its just not very good. White needs to find something against 1d4 d5 2Nc3 Nf6 3Bg5 Nbd7 4f3 c6 with the idea to play a quick e5. was interesting to see this recommended by vigorito in his repertoire book for black against d4

I think 4.f3 is premature. Last time I played the Veresov, which was last month, I preferred 4.e3 (and was gratified to find afterwards it's recommended by Nigel Davies in his Veresov book).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
realpolitik
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 66
Joined: 01/15/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #13 - 07/29/08 at 16:53:21
Post Tools
I used to play the Veresov occasionally, then I realised that its just not very good. White needs to find something against 1d4 d5 2Nc3 Nf6 3Bg5 Nbd7 4f3 c6 with the idea to play a quick e5. was interesting to see this recommended by vigorito in his repertoire book for black against d4
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #12 - 07/29/08 at 16:17:57
Post Tools
Well, surely someone interested in playing the Veresov should be looking at Hector's games.  I tend to refer to 3...Nbd7 4. Qd3 as the Hector Variation ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
knightmare
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 85
Location: Germany
Joined: 12/01/06
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #11 - 07/29/08 at 14:33:19
Post Tools
TimS wrote on 07/27/08 at 10:09:07:
JN wrote on 07/27/08 at 07:57:48:
White seems to be (at least a bit) worse in all lines after 3.- c5!

If so, then the Chigorin must be busted as White is essentially playing it with an extra tempo


The Veresov IMHO is simply desperately in need of a "Hero". I guess Moro would need to play 1 single game (and win) to create interest
The same statements were written and quoted about the Chigorin before Moro began to use it. There's a lot of space for improvement in many of those offbeat openings. And these strange knight-moves seem to get more attention recently.
  

ELO 2060. Corr.: 2190. Which casts doubts if I ever knew what I was doing. At least on the Board.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JN
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 56
Joined: 12/11/04
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #10 - 07/29/08 at 13:27:36
Post Tools
At the very same day, and at the exact same time as I wrote my last post in this thread, GM Hector played a game in Politiken Cup against GM Evdokimov. The game went 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bg5 c5 4.Bf6 gf6 5. e3 and Hector went on to win the game in just 32 moves. His 8.Nf3 appears to be a new move. Both Davies and Cox only investigate 8.0-0-0. In Hector-Evdokimov white goes on to castle kingside instead. Perhaps there is hope for white in the 3.- c5 line afterall..!? The game can be found here: http://www.ksu.dk/politiken_cup//live/1/live.aspx?aar=2008 [scroll down].
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #9 - 07/27/08 at 11:32:35
Post Tools
Indeed, otherwise I'll have to start playing e.g. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nf3 Bg4 4.a3 from now onwards in order to find some vaguely useful waiting move and turn this into this super-favourable situation you are talking about JN.  Wink

Quite honestly looking at it from a Chigorin perspective, white is hardly going to be worse after 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bg5 c5 4.Bxf6 gxf6 5.e3 or 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.e3 Bg4 Be2 or the like. It's hardly exciting stuff and I would want to aim for something more promising as white, but I don't think white has to be too worried.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TimS
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 458
Location: London
Joined: 11/02/05
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #8 - 07/27/08 at 10:09:07
Post Tools
JN wrote on 07/27/08 at 07:57:48:
Hmmm... just found out that 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bg5 c5  is also recommended by John Cox in his Dealing with d4 Deviations. Guess I will have to give up the idea about using the Veresov as a reliable, yet narrow, white rep. White seems to be (at least a bit) worse in all lines after 3.- c5!

If so, then the Chigorin must be busted as White is essentially playing it with an extra tempo
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JN
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 56
Joined: 12/11/04
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #7 - 07/27/08 at 07:57:48
Post Tools
Hmmm... just found out that 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bg5 c5  is also recommended by John Cox in his Dealing with d4 Deviations. Guess I will have to give up the idea about using the Veresov as a reliable, yet narrow, white rep. White seems to be (at least a bit) worse in all lines after 3.- c5!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #6 - 07/19/08 at 10:11:22
Post Tools
Playing Nc3 before c4 is probably strategical dubios in d-pawn openings. Therefore Black should theoretically be OK - but this doesnt hinder you to surprise your opponents with some fancy Veresov-lines. 

Catch the (black) fish by surprise but dont always try to catch him this way  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JN
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 56
Joined: 12/11/04
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #5 - 07/19/08 at 10:02:26
Post Tools
Quote:
gxf6 is the move. For this I recommend e4 but I would research if nf3 or e3 is a better try.


5. e4 is probably not white's best. It seems that black has a tiny plus after 5. - dxe4 6. dxc5 and now f5 instead of the often played Qa5. Looks like black is ok or even a little bit better in the f5-line. 

5. Nf3 Nc6 is analyzed by Davies and seems to be good for white after 6. e4! However 5. - e5! is much better than Nc6 and white has really nothing.

5. e3 is probably white's best, but nevertheless dead equal.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
trw
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1414
Joined: 05/06/08
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #4 - 07/18/08 at 23:16:51
Post Tools
I agree with the previous posters and would add some things that will calm your fear about c5.

I've only played the Verseov three times and two times i've played c5 because it seemed like the best move. In fact, I now am prepared to actually play c5 but the first two times I was not.

Example: d4 d5 nc3 nf6 Bg5 c5 Bxf6 (most of the time at the amateur level you are going to see exf6 where both sides have an easy but equal game if not slight edge to white) however gxf6 is the move. For this I recommend e4 but I would research if nf3 or e3 is a better try.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #3 - 07/18/08 at 22:48:43
Post Tools
I fully agree with the previous posters. Come on, essentially white is playing the Chigorin line 1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nf3 Bg4 a tempo up - it is as if black was allowed to move again in that Chigorin line! Of course white has the typical slight edge/initiative thing that he gets in any opening, so I guess the question is just what that extra tempo is worth. But surely it should mean that white it is at least equal in the Veresov?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dmp4373
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 99
Joined: 03/04/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #2 - 07/18/08 at 14:19:30
Post Tools
"So what's holding me back?"

Perhaps your expectations for White. If you're going to play d-pawn Specials openings you'd better get used Black equalizing early and often. But at the non-professional level - so what!

d-pawn Specials are about playing the types of middlegames you like with the advantage of having more experience with them than your opponent and needing less theoretical study to play them well. They're for amateur players not searching for some ultimate truth in chess.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: Veresov: Refutation?
Reply #1 - 07/18/08 at 09:46:45
Post Tools
Quote:
1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bg5

White has developed 2 pieces and made no bigger mistake (perhaps a small one to obstructe the c-pawn) - there is certainly no refutation in sight. Perhaps you should ask about the most promising line for Black - but this also depends on what Black wants: - fast equalizing, - a save game, - good counterchances (but perhaps risky)  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JN
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 56
Joined: 12/11/04
Gender: Male
Veresov: Refutation?
07/18/08 at 09:09:04
Post Tools
How to build a fairly narrow but yet reliable white repertoire? The Veresov may be it. I have been thinking about giving it a try for some time now. I even bought the two books by Smith/Hall and Davies (the latter is by far the best of them). So what is holding me back? Primarily one line that seems impossible to crack. The line in question goes: 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bg5 c5(!). Is it just me being too pessimistic about white's chances in this line or is 3.- c5 simply the refutation of the Veresov?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo