Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Noteboom / Abrahms move order (Read 14913 times)
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4958
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #12 - 12/04/08 at 21:27:09
Post Tools
That looks like an unfavorable Cambridge Springs for White; I presume he would play 7. Nbd2.  ECO and NCO think that should be equal, though.

It seems that the main reply to 4. Qc2 is 4...Nf6 (similar and sometimes transposing is 4...dc) and if 5. Bg5 dc (Meran-like).  ECO and NCO think that should lead to equality or unclarity.  Is there some reason to think they are wrong?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10766
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #11 - 12/04/08 at 20:33:03
Post Tools
Sleepy kitten wrote on 12/04/08 at 14:38:45:
Simple question: after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 e6, 4.Qc2 is described as "tricky". Isn't it very strong? What can Black do against it? For example, isn't 4...Nf6 5.Bg5 a very poor version of queen's gambit declined?


Would you really call the Cambridge Springs (5...Nbd7 6.e3 Qa5+ 7.Nc3) very poor? This transposition is a bit irritating from Black's point of vew of course; so is 4...f5 5.g3 transposing to Stonewall main lines. That's why 4...dxc4 and 4...Bd6 have been tried, but I don't know their status these days.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ANDREW BRETT
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 622
Joined: 07/07/06
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #10 - 12/04/08 at 15:50:20
Post Tools
It's tricky line - 4..f5 is risky but 4.. nf6 5 bg5 h6 is an unusual game - I think aronian may have faced this .
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sleepy kitten
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 27
Joined: 07/28/08
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #9 - 12/04/08 at 14:38:45
Post Tools
Simple question: after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 e6, 4.Qc2 is described as "tricky". Isn't it very strong? What can Black do against it? For example, isn't 4...Nf6 5.Bg5 a very poor version of queen's gambit declined?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
swingdoc
Junior Member
**
Offline


Improving One Day at a
Time

Posts: 79
Location: Over the rainbow
Joined: 12/07/07
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #8 - 11/19/08 at 20:25:46
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 11/19/08 at 11:23:10:
I disagree - 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 c6 3.e3 Bg4 idea e6, Nd7, f5, Ngf6 is a very nice independent option. 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 c6 3.Bf4 Qb6 is playable as well.


I completely agree. I prefer to develop my light squared bishop vs the Colle setups before playing e6, either Bg4 or Bf5. That's why I prefer not to play 2 ... e6. Against the London, 2 ... c6 3 ... Qb6 is playable, but not the most challenging setup imo. At least at my level Colle's and London's are far more popular than main lines, so I tend to consider the best answer to those first and it's certainly something you need to consider when building a repertoire.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #7 - 11/19/08 at 15:53:16
Post Tools
Alluren wrote on 11/13/08 at 21:06:22:

Is it in practice often played ? If yes by who ? By weaker player that want to draw, by stronger player that wants to take no risks and win later ?


There are those who play this for the win from the first move.  I am one of them, in fact.  If I were a Slav player I would meet this with the main line, not with an early ...a6 and not with 6...Nh5 as recommended in one recent repertoire book.  Black holds with good play, of course.

But it mystifies me why anyone absolutely needing the full point would play 2...c6 against a good opponent, given that Black's winning chances in the Exchange are pretty slight.  Since the Noteboom is so combative, I would think that 2...e6 would be a more appealing way of reaching it.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10766
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #6 - 11/19/08 at 11:23:10
Post Tools
I disagree - 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 c6 3.e3 Bg4 idea e6, Nd7, f5, Ngf6 is a very nice independent option. 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 c6 3.Bf4 Qb6 is playable as well.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
swingdoc
Junior Member
**
Offline


Improving One Day at a
Time

Posts: 79
Location: Over the rainbow
Joined: 12/07/07
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #5 - 11/19/08 at 11:15:46
Post Tools
Something I didn't see mentioned was 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3. This gets played quite frequently and playing either 2 ... c6 or 2 ... e6 cuts out some of black's better options vs the "d-pawn specials" (Torre, London, Colle). 2 ... e6 is probably the better option if you definitely want to play the noteboom as c5 is an important move in a ton of those special systems. I get the exchange slav played against me all the time - both by lower rated players hoping to make a draw and by higher rated players hoping to outplay me positionally with little risk to themselves.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alluren
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 33
Joined: 04/21/08
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #4 - 11/13/08 at 21:06:22
Post Tools
Thanks all for your answers. I'll try to dig a bit a few points.

Markovich wrote on 11/12/08 at 20:01:52:

If you want a fight, 2...e6 is marginally a better way to reach the Noteboom than 2...c6 because the Exchange Slav is hard to score a full point against and even contains some venom.  


Is it in practice often played ? If yes by who ? By weaker player that want to draw, by stronger player that wants to take no risks and win later ?

Markovich wrote on 11/12/08 at 20:01:52:

Either way though, one position that has to concern you is: white pawns on c4,d4, white knight on f3; black pawns on c6,d5,e6; everything else on original squares.  In this position, White can play 4.Qc2 and flummox your Noteboom ambitions.  If you play 4...Nf6 he can play 5.Bg5 with a reasonably good Queen's Gambit. 

The other thing you have to worry about is the Marshall Gambit.  With a white knight on c3 instead of f3, White plays 4.e4.  This gambit is extremely dangerous.


My plan is not necessarly to obtain each time a noteboom, but if because of this "threat" I can reach a different QGD that would be fine for me. I need to check this.

MNb wrote on 11/12/08 at 20:01:52:

And are you ready to play something entirely different after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 (e6) 3.Nf3/4.Nc3 e6 (c6) 4.e3 ? Many fans of the Noteboom transpose to the Stonewall here (4...f5), but is that what you want?


I would really like the stonewall ...

So the question for me is : If I can play 2... dxc4 to avoid early e3 without allowing e5 without fearing other white possibilities like 3.e4 then I might go for it.

The other part would be playing Nf6 only after e3 which avoids all the Bg5 systems. I don't know for the moment the outcome of these systems, but I will defenitively check.

derdudea wrote on 11/12/08 at 20:01:52:

Black seems to be o.k. in the marshall, but has to know theory. 


Is there any place where I could learn the theory about it ?
Chesspub ? NIC yearbooks ? Other books ?

I'll continue digging this jungle of move order subtilities and will most probably come back with more questions Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
derdudea
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 176
Location: Germany
Joined: 10/03/08
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #3 - 11/13/08 at 15:33:43
Post Tools
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3. Nf3 / Nc3 c6 then dxc4 seems to be the best line to get there, because any exchange on d5 leads to a version of the QG exchange black will like.

The Marshall gambit is not easy, but quite rarely played. Most white players reach semi-slav positions via 2....c6 3.Nf3 and why learn a highly complicated variation, when you only can use it after 2....e6 Nc3...)? Black seems to be o.k. in the marshall, but has to know theory. 

As I tried to find a black repertoire against 1.d4, I thought I could base it on the Noteboom - maybe like you do. The bitter truth is: Very few white players allow it! Almost everybody plays 4.e3. So you have to play other (Meran) lines too, or transpose to the stonewall by 4....f5 or 4.....Bd6 5.Nf3 f5 

The noteboom sometimes occurs in blitz games or in my low-level OTB-games, but almost never in CorrCess or against OTB-opponents who have a good opening knowledge. 

By the way if you like the stonewall its good to know, that the so-called "Slav-Stonewall" is easier to play than the original, because the mover order most of the time cuts out the most dangerous lines of the standard stonewall like Nh3 or Bf4. Black usually has better chances to get an attack one the kingside, because white does not play g3. Furthermore, White will often not be familiar with it, because he normally plays other variations agaisnt the Dutch.

If you are ready to become some kind of stonewall-specialist this is the easiest and laziest repertoire against 1.d4 you can imagine. Sure there are some tricky sidelines with Qc2 or early Bg5, but in 90% of your games you get

- an QG - exchange allowing you to place your bishop on f5

- the Noteboom or Marshall Attack - and only for these systems you need exact and deep theoretical knowledge

- The Slav-Stonewall as described above

- a "normal" stonewall variation if White plays an early g3. This most of the times happens after 1.Nf3 or 1.c4, so this move order even gives you a line against the flank openings

But you have to love the stonewall! If you do, this repertoire is extremely easy to play and quite sound.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10766
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #2 - 11/13/08 at 01:16:00
Post Tools
The Slav Exchange, the Marshall Gambit and that 4.Qc2 line all can be avoided by 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nc3/3.Nf3 c6 4.Nf3/Nc3 e6, though there is a price to pay again: White has 3.e4 and a few other deviations. After 2.Nf3 c6 (because you don't want to play Nf6) 3.c4 Black has dxc4.

So what do you want? Meet the Slav Exchange? The Marshall Gambit and 4.Qc2? Or rather the popular QGA 3.e4 ?

And are you ready to play something entirely different after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 (e6) 3.Nf3/4.Nc3 e6 (c6) 4.e3 ? Many fans of the Noteboom transpose to the Stonewall here (4...f5), but is that what you want?
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Noteboom / Abrahms move order
Reply #1 - 11/12/08 at 20:01:52
Post Tools
Alluren wrote on 11/12/08 at 19:45:40:
Hi everyone !

I recently saw some games in the noteboom and I started being intrested in this opening. As I never played 1 ... d5 in my life, I would need some advice on the best way to reach the typical position which include. e6, c6, d5, dxc4, b5, Bb4, a5, Bxc3, Bb7 and b4.
Since there are many ways to reach it, which are the pros and the cons of :

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3. Nf3 / Nc3 e6 then dxc4
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3. Nf3 / Nc3 c6 then dxc4
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 c6 4.e3 b5 5. a4 e6 6. Nc3 Bb4 ...

I know that a high number of players will play something like Nf3 Bf4 to avoid everything, but I saw some books about doing something against it. What I don't know is the amount of players who plays the exchange variation of the QGD which would then make me prefer the 2...dxc4 variation.

Which move order would make an early e3 (avoiding the noteboom) inoffensive ?

Thanks for help Smiley


If you want a fight, 2...e6 is marginally a better way to reach the Noteboom than 2...c6 because the Exchange Slav is hard to score a full point against and even contains some venom.  1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.dxc4 is not an issue because this way, Black will painlessly develop his c8 bishop to f5. 

Either way though, one position that has to concern you is: white pawns on c4,d4, white knight on f3; black pawns on c6,d5,e6; everything else on original squares.  In this position, White can play 4.Qc2 and flummox your Noteboom ambitions.  If you play 4...Nf6 he can play 5.Bg5 with a reasonably good Queen's Gambit. 

The other thing you have to worry about is the Marshall Gambit.  With a white knight on c3 instead of f3, White plays 4.e4.  This gambit is extremely dangerous.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alluren
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 33
Joined: 04/21/08
Noteboom / Abrahms move order
11/12/08 at 19:45:40
Post Tools
Hi everyone !

I recently saw some games in the noteboom and I started being intrested in this opening. As I never played 1 ... d5 in my life, I would need some advice on the best way to reach the typical position which include. e6, c6, d5, dxc4, b5, Bb4, a5, Bxc3, Bb7 and b4.
Since there are many ways to reach it, which are the pros and the cons of :

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3. Nf3 / Nc3 e6 then dxc4
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3. Nf3 / Nc3 c6 then dxc4
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 c6 4.e3 b5 5. a4 e6 6. Nc3 Bb4 ...

I know that a high number of players will play something like Nf3 Bf4 to avoid everything, but I saw some books about doing something against it. What I don't know is the amount of players who plays the exchange variation of the QGD which would then make me prefer the 2...dxc4 variation.

Which move order would make an early e3 (avoiding the noteboom) inoffensive ?

Thanks for help Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo