(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › 1. e4 e5 - Non-Spanish › Kings Gambit › C39: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
(Moderators: trw, Smyslov_Fan, Jupp53)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) C39: KG Keisertsky line verdict? (Read 15805 times)
STEFANOS
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 71
Joined: 03/27/08
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #11 - 01/10/09 at 15:17:55
Post Tools
For me , the most difficult position in practice  for white it is the after 5...d6 6.Nxg4 balck to play Be7, any comments ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
micawber
God Member
*****
Offline


like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #10 - 01/04/09 at 00:09:14
Post Tools
Thx CMA,

The first part of the download, will hopefully be available together with the january edition of the e4-e5 section. This will provide a reasonable (up to date) coverage of the Modern. 

As it was I updated and expanded the coverage of c34 and c37-c39 first.
Hence the second part has been made available before the first part.
Sorry for the confusion.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cma6
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 169
Location: US
Joined: 07/17/04
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #9 - 01/03/09 at 20:22:59
Post Tools
micawber wrote on 12/10/08 at 14:02:42:
Thx for sharing this game. I suppose you were not "desperate for a win" and judged the resulting complications from 21...h4 22.e6,h3 23.RXf7+,Kg8 as very unclear.

 
Micawber, I just got your very useful "Forum_KG_2" download: what a great job you have done!
 However, I could not find "Forum_KG_1" download, as I am particularly interested in the Modern Defense 2...exf; 3 Nf3, d5 which some experts have called the solidest reply to the KG.
                     Thanks, CMA
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
flaviddude
Senior Member
****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 329
Location: Australia
Joined: 01/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #8 - 12/10/08 at 23:41:25
Post Tools
I mistakenly thought that the draw would guarantee me a place in the next stage of a fixed openings tournament. I missed out by half a point. 

I use the final position to test computer programs. They also struggle.
  
I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
micawber
God Member
*****
Offline


like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #7 - 12/10/08 at 14:02:42
Post Tools
Thx for sharing this game. I suppose you were not "desperate for a win" and judged the resulting complications from 21...h4 22.e6,h3 23.RXf7+,Kg8 as very unclear.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
flaviddude
Senior Member
****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 329
Location: Australia
Joined: 01/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #6 - 12/09/08 at 23:59:37
Post Tools
The attached game probably confuses the issue even further. I would rather try and win with the King's gambit than face the stodge of the Berlin Wall or the Petroff. But that is a matter of personal taste. The incredibly messy positions that can arise in the King's gambit would not suit many chess players.
  
game22123.pgn ( 0 KB | Downloads )
I am hopelessly addicted to the King's Gambit
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10758
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #5 - 11/16/08 at 13:21:34
Post Tools
Indeed 7...Bg7 is my second worry from White's perspective immediately after 5...d6. The big problem is not to maintain equality - imo 6.Bc4 is completely correct - but to generate winning chances.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
micawber
God Member
*****
Offline


like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #4 - 11/16/08 at 12:31:47
Post Tools
Looking at the analyses in over the Horizon, it wouldnt surprise me, that
in the future we may see more games with   Bc4,d5 exd5 Bg7 iso ...Bd6.
Note that our Forummember David Flude made some valuable contributions against the .....Bd6 line.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alluren
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 33
Joined: 04/21/08
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #3 - 11/16/08 at 12:14:05
Post Tools
It's treated in Play the Open games by John Emms page 67. He recommends the normal d5 exd5 Bd6. Check the book for furhter details.
This book is a little bit old, so maybe the theory state has evolved ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10758
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #2 - 11/16/08 at 12:12:27
Post Tools
Chessmoby wrote on 11/15/08 at 20:49:13:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4!?

is there a published refutation because most games continue with 6.d4 d6 of which the main lines are known to be difficult for white???


No. These days most KGeers prefer 6.Bc4 indeed.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
g2-g4
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 38
Location: Moscow
Joined: 11/01/08
Gender: Male
Re: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
Reply #1 - 11/15/08 at 21:56:22
Post Tools
There was discussion on this line in chesscafe's "Over the horizons" recently.
  
Back to top
Skype/VoIPFacebook  
IP Logged
 
Chessmoby
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 162
Joined: 06/09/08
C39: KG Keisertsky line verdict?
11/15/08 at 20:49:13
Post Tools
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ne5 Nf6 6.Bc4!?

is there a published refutation because most games continue with 6.d4 d6 of which the main lines are known to be difficult for white???
« Last Edit: 11/21/11 at 22:21:36 by Smyslov_Fan »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge