michele wrote on 01/15/09 at 08:41:21:
I think so,... but as I said I put them away as I am not a big theory dog,... The problem with the sicilian is NOT the sicilian, (even though Keres called it the Silicide Defence), it is / are all the 'other' systems (e.g. GP Attack, Smith Morra, Moscow, Bc4, KIA) you have to learn to just get your head around it. I would recommend the Romanian GM's book though for these out of Sicilian type universes. GM Rogazin -- please forgive spelling. Really handles all the possible systems and ideas for black. And is objectively superior to any other books on the market for white. (..._
t
I guess you mean Rogozenko's "Anti-Sicilians - A Guide for Black" - a good book IMHO, although a few years old now.
Palliser's more recent "Fighting the Anti-Sicilians" is also useful and deals with some different ways for Black.
Regarding the Scheveningen, the section in Jansa's "Dynamics of Chess Strategy" remains one of the very best tools for quickly getting to the core of what the classical main lines (White Be2, 0-0) are all about, in spirit and in detail.
There are also a couple of games in Suba's book "Dynamic Chess Strategy"which give great insights into this opening.
Games of life-long practitioners such as Andrey Sokolov can teach you a lot.
From the white side, Geller is possibly the best classical model.
The main problem has always been the Keres Attack. To allow it? If so, how to deal with it? To avoid it by clever move orders (but then what else are you letting yourself in for?).
And of course in recent years we have faced the extra problem of the English Attack. One would have thought that if the English Attack is dangerous against the Taimanov, it would be even more so when Black is committed to an early ...d6.
All in all, a lot to think about, a lot of typical positions and maneouvres to master, and a lot of move order issues to sort out.
One can understand why so many sub-elite players go for the stereotyped simplicities of the Dragon and the Sveshnikov ("an opening for idiots" - Nigel Short).
thanks for the Suba reference. Adjorans slightly unussual books also contain a few Scheveningen nuggets.
I'm drawn to the Scheveningen because I feel it is an opening where understanding matters. Stereotyped play will get you in a lot of trouble in my experience. Still it would be nice to have a book where all the different move-orders are discussed. Transpositions everywhere which gives me the uneasy feeling that I might miss a few ... .