Sorry guys for my last post, bit tried because of work!!

The line i was talking about was;

1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 e6 6.

Bg5 Be7 7. Bd3 c5? 8. dxc5! Nc6 9. Qd2 O-O 10. O-O-O Qa5 11. Bxf6 Bxf6 12. Ne4

Qxd2+ 13. Rxd2 Be7 , with a clean advantage to white.

One other line could go;

1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 e6 6.

Bg5 Be7 7. Bd3 c5? 8. dxc5! O-O ! 9. Qe2 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Qa5 11. Bc4 Nxc5 12. Ne5 h6 13. Bd2

Qc7 14. Bf4 Qb6 15. h4 Nfd7 , with equal chances.

One last line might go;

1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 e6 6.

Bg5 Be7 7. Bd3 c5? 8. dxc5! Bxc5 9. Qd2 O-O 10. O-O-O Nbd7 11. Kb1! Qa5 12. Qe2 h6 13. Bh4 a6 14. Rhf1 Rd8 15. Ne4 Be7 16. Nxf6+ Bxf6?? this move loses very quickly (16... Nxf6 better, but black still looks bad 17. Ne5 Qc7 18. g4! b5 19. g5 hxg5 20. Bxg5 Bb7 21. Rg1 Rd5 22. Rde1 Rad8 23. now black gets mashed Nxf7! Rxd3 24. cxd3 Kxf7 25. Qxe6+ Kf8 26. Bh6!! Rd6 27. Bxg7+ Ke8 28. Qe5) 17. Qe4 g6 18.

Bxf6 Nxf6 19. Qf4 Kg7 20. Ne5 and it is all over.

Now as always with analysis, one can find better moves, but i think i have proved that in Tom Pursers BDG pages { article called " hard times" 5 th of April 2010} 7..c5 followed by 8.Qd2 is simply wrong, 8.dc is much better.

I love Toms web site, but on this point i have to say that " Hard Times" ??? I think not.

Well, I think that 7...c5 is may be not the best. Literature gives 7...Nc6. Stefan Bücker's Kaissiber 8 gives it and concludes difficulties for Black after 8.a3 and equal but drawish play after 8.Qd2.

So White has to proof that he can develop some initiative after 7...Nc6. That is the test for 7.Bd3.