CraigEvans wrote on 01/07/10 at 11:31:53:
Indeed, I find Lev's avoidance of a "book" on the ...c6 lines as a hint that even he has no real faith in white's prospects here, against correct play. A book holds little interest if it does not hold up to analytical scrutiny, after all...
Also, I wonder if the articles on the ZGED will contain the refutations found by forum members here. I think not, somehow...
Dude, that was Part 1 of 2! And it was the Euwe Defense, which is what I am writing about. Regarding these so-called refutations, I suggest you wait for Part 2.
I do not appreciate you putting words and opinions in my mouth that I do not subscribe to. To you, correct play is having a Rybka or Fritz chess engine help you out. To me, it is making my opponent think over-the-board, without the benefit of a computer. You see, in OTB tournaments, you cannot use a computer! Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha...
As for the annoying 4...c6/5...c6 lines, there is more than enough written on the subject already. I understand IM Christopher Scheerer will have a book out on the BDG. How about we wait and see what he has to offer?
FYI, after 4...c6, White can simply play 5 Nxe4.
Finally, let me say that I decided to test "The Hippo", an interesting opening. It occurs after 1 e4 g6 2 d4 d6
3 Nf3 b6, 4 Bc4 Bg7 5 Be3 Bb7 6 Qd2 h6.
I have played it in OTB tournament games and scored pretty well with it. My point is that it is different from the Pirc/Robatsch/Modern Defences in that both Bishops are fianchettoed, not just one. Interesting stuff!
Other lines I like to play include the Kevitz-Trajkovic (aka Black Knights Tango, Mexican Defense) 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 Nc6!?; the Marshall Defense, Flank Gambit, against the Queen's Gambit Declined, 1 d4 d5 2 c4 Nf6 3 cxd4 b5!?
I like variety in unorthodox, little-played openings, you know?