It's much appreciated! 

I'm trying to make the Dragadorf (or accelerated Dragadorf) work myself as a winning try. Will take a good look at your analysis this evening and see if I have anything to add.

Thanks blksabb for the flattery...

Of course its not a total unbust as i am sure mr. jones and mr. ward found something against it. Besides for a practical game it would take incredibly long to study the entire double pawn sac line.

there is an updated version coming up after I run the entire thing through rybka 3. up till now, i only used that at critical points. The verdict might yet change to +/= or even worse ...     

Finally let me deflect yet more of the flattering by pointing out that that analysis was made "hot off the press" viz. I did in a hurry, and I will be more painstaking and hwardworking with the analysis in the new version.

Funny, when I glanced at the new Dragon update yesterday evening, I thought 'damn, the accelerated Dragondorf refuted?'
But when I got up today I looked at the whole thing a little closer and also noticed that black could be OK after 14. ... Bg7.
By the way, what about the more natural 15.fe5: Ne5!? (instead of Be5:), preserving the right to castle?
Rybka thinks black is alright there.