(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › Flank Openings › English 1...e5 › How about the Dragadorf Reversed?
(Moderators: Hadron, proustiskeen)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
Normal Topic How about the Dragadorf Reversed? (Read 3909 times)
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10765
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: How about the Dragadorf Reversed?
Reply #3 - 05/09/10 at 14:58:41
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 05/09/10 at 14:33:53:
It's a book sort of thing.  Off the top of my head I think it's been played by a certain Kosten.
  Cheesy. Thanks. No, I was not under the impression of me being original.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TonyRo
God Member
*****
Offline


I'm gonna crack your skull!

Posts: 1831
Location: Cleveland, OH
Joined: 11/26/07
Gender: Male
Re: How about the Dragadorf Reversed?
Reply #2 - 05/09/10 at 14:56:13
Post Tools
Yes, this made it into Kosten's legendary tome as the recommendation in the Dragon Reversed. I'm also faily sure Aronian played this line a few times.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4955
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: How about the Dragadorf Reversed?
Reply #1 - 05/09/10 at 14:33:53
Post Tools
It's a book sort of thing.  Off the top of my head I think it's been played by a certain Kosten.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10765
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
How about the Dragadorf Reversed?
05/09/10 at 14:31:35
Post Tools
When playing through the first moves of Anand-Topalov (11th game) I wondered how well Knight e4 would be placed on c4 instead. In other words, is a Dragadorf with colours reversed a viable idea?
The move order should be something like 1.c4 e5 2.g3 Nc6 3.Bg2 Nf6 4.d3 d5  5.cxd5 Nxd5 6.Nf3 Be7 7.0-0 0-0 8.a3 followed by b4, Nbd2 and Bb2.
Of course 4...Bc5 and 4...Bb4+ (probably 5.Nbd2) have to be taken into account.
Any opinions?
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge