Dear all:
I am very happy that the KID section is in the very good shape now, with a new author.
The KID is a very complex opening; I had had enough with covering it after all, what happened sooner than I expected initially, but what to do...
Regarding the following reference to one my game in notes to S.Kasparov-Bocharov from the June update:
Quote:1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. f3 g6 4. c4 Bg7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Be3 Nc6 7. Nge2 a6 8. h4 h5 9. Qd2 Re8!? 10. Nc1
The critical line is 10. O-O-O After 10... b5 11. Nd5 bxc4 12. Nxf6+ Bxf6 13. g4 hxg4 14. h5 g5!? 15. Bxg5 e5 16. Bxf6 Qxf6 17. fxg4 exd4 18. g5 Qf3 19. g6 Bg4 This was suggested by Golubev, and he got to try it against Lautier himself!(19... fxg6 20. Nxd4 Nxd4 21. Qxd4 was much better for White in Lautier, J-Piket, J /Cannes 1990) 20. Rg1 Rxe4? (stronger is 20... fxg6! 21. Re1 to take on d4 21... c3!? 22. bxc3 Bxh5 23. Nxd4 Nxd4 24. Qxd4 Qf4+ 25. Kb2 Qe5=/+) 21. gxf7+ Kxf7 22. Bg2+- was Lautier, J (2682)-Golubev, M (2484)/Odessa (rapid) 2006.
In 2007, I annotated the game vs Lautier here:
http://mikhail-golubev.livejournal.com/8208.html(the PGN file is attached)
Possibly, my analysis can be improved, I will be only happy in this particular case as my conclusion was that Black has problems in this line.