Latest Updates:
Normal Topic C57: Traxler:Ninov's Refutation (Read 1807 times)
Djy
Full Member
***
Offline


Non mais y connait pas
Raoul!

Posts: 157
Joined: 03/21/10
Re: Traxler:Ninov's Refutation
Reply #2 - 08/30/10 at 10:46:48
Post Tools
Thanks for the answer

In the 9.-cd6 line, I completely miss the transposition in stefan's colomn!
A big thanks for point out this one.

I've some analyse in the 9.-Qd6 line and i agree with you 

A suscription , it's not a bad idea!
  

La connerie c'est la décrontaction de l'intelligence  Gainsbourg
La victoire est brillante mais l'échec est mat!  Coluche
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
micawber
God Member
*****
Offline


like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender: Male
Re: Traxler:Ninov's Refutation
Reply #1 - 08/30/10 at 07:30:06
Post Tools
Hi
We are talking about
1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nc6 3.Bc4,Nf6 4.Ng5,Bc5 5.Nxf7,Bxf2+
6.Kf1,Qe7 7.Nxh8, d5 8.exd5,Nd4 9.d6,cxd6
10.Kxf2,d5
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

11.d3,exd3 12.h3 and white is better
(Ninov - Marzola, 2008)

Three remarks
1) I think 11...Ng4 superior to 11...exd3
Imho Black retains sufficient compensation after
12.Na3,Qf6 or 12.c3,Qf6
2) However note that White can evade 11....Ng4
with the move order 11.h3!,dxc 12.d3 which is a suggestion by Buecker (over the horizon/2007).
3) As far as I know 9...Qxd6 has yet to be refuted
10.Nf7,Qe7 (John Jerz) is the critical line,
while 10...Qc5 has not been refuted either.
==============================
P.M. A forum member who had access to both the
subscription area and had NIC YB 90, confirmed
that there was hardly anything new in Ninov's article.
compared to the survey i did for Chesspub.
http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1236160171/15
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Djy
Full Member
***
Offline


Non mais y connait pas
Raoul!

Posts: 157
Joined: 03/21/10
C57: Traxler:Ninov's Refutation
08/29/10 at 09:45:58
Post Tools
Can  anybody tell me more about Ninov's refutation of the Traxler in the line 9.d6 cd6 10.Kf2 d5 11.d3 dc4 in the NIC yearbook 90?
Is Ninov give a line after 11.-Ng4  ?

Thanks in advance!
« Last Edit: 07/24/11 at 20:58:11 by Smyslov_Fan »  

La connerie c'est la décrontaction de l'intelligence  Gainsbourg
La victoire est brillante mais l'échec est mat!  Coluche
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo