@TN/Jediknight
on the line
1.e4,e5 2.d4,cxd 3.c3,Nc6 4.cxd4,Bb4 5.Nc3,d5
6.e5,Nge7 (6...f6!? is interesting as well)
7.Nf3
The line discussed went.
7.Nf3,0-0 (i will argue at the end of my post that this move-order is maybe not optimal and Black should perhaps opt for 7....Bg4!
line A 8.Bd3 (TN), f6!
9.0-0 (9.exf6,Rxf is reasonable for Black) ,
9........ fxe (9...0-0?! 10.Bxh7, Kxh7? (better 10...Kh8) 11.Ng5 +/-
10.Nxe5, (The sac 10.Bxh7 does not work)
10........., Bf5= line B8.Be2,Bg4 (8....f6 comes into consideration as well)
9.0-0, Nf5= (Jediknight; Actually played in Leisebein-Ratzman, corr., 2001)
This game went:
10.Ng5!?,Bxe2 11.Nxe2,Qd7 12.Qd3,Be7
13.Qd2,Bxg5 14.Bxg5
And now the game went 14....Rfe8 15.Rac1+/=
Black should 14...Rae8= instead, preparing f6!
But this is not everything that can be said:
After
7.Nf3, Bg4! (iso 7....0-0)
8.Be2 (8.Bd3,Nxd4! -/+),
0-0 there is a transposition to line B.