Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Recommend Black repertoire for my style (Read 9580 times)
Pawnpusher
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 215
Joined: 01/04/18
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #21 - 04/09/21 at 10:49:00
Post Tools
If it helps, I got a good dog as a rescue!! She always sort of knew she had dodged a bullet.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
doefmat
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 88
Joined: 04/03/17
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #20 - 04/09/21 at 10:42:06
Post Tools
You could play the Semi-Slav like the Sam Shankland Repertoire where you avoid the sharp Bg5 stuff by going for the Cambridge Springs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #19 - 04/08/21 at 17:06:32
Post Tools
katar wrote on 04/06/21 at 16:03:58:
ErictheRed wrote on 04/06/21 at 12:12:23:
Well I pretty much quit playing competitive, over-the-board chess around 2012 or 2013, so it's been a while!  *** If I ever return to competitive OTB chess (not likely with three kids aged 8, 5, and 1.5 years old!), these are the lines I'd probably choose.

Sounds like you have put winning at chess on pause in order to win at life.  Smiley


Today we're adopting a two year old dog as well.  I frankly don't know whether I'm winning or losing, but the position has surely changed rapidly!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 438
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #18 - 04/06/21 at 16:03:58
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 04/06/21 at 12:12:23:
Well I pretty much quit playing competitive, over-the-board chess around 2012 or 2013, so it's been a while!  *** If I ever return to competitive OTB chess (not likely with three kids aged 8, 5, and 1.5 years old!), these are the lines I'd probably choose.

Sounds like you have put winning at chess on pause in order to win at life.  Smiley
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #17 - 04/06/21 at 12:12:23
Post Tools
Well I pretty much quit playing competitive, over-the-board chess around 2012 or 2013, so it's been a while!  I was still playing my random Sicilians mostly back then, with the occasional French or Caro-Kann.  Against 1.d4, I kept playing the Triangle and occasional Dutch, but also threw in some Tarrasch and Lasker QGD games, and a few Benko games.  Basically a bunch of random stuff in those last couple of years.

After quitting over-the-board chess, my current "repertoire" is different, but only applies to online play and is not that fleshed out.  I've been playing 1...e5 almost exclusively, and wish that I had taken it up years ago.  It was less work than I thought it would be, and I like the positions that I get.  I generally play the New Archangel (is that what it's called?) with 5...b5 6.Bb3 Bc5 against the Spanish.  Against 1.d4 I'm still a bit random, but mostly play the Ragozin.  I think that these lines suit me very well, as they put an emphasize classical principles like rapid development, space, and central control, but are unbalanced enough to play for a win.  If I ever return to competitive OTB chess (not likely with three kids aged 8, 5, and 1.5 years old!), these are the lines I'd probably choose.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Laramonet
Senior Member
****
Offline


Gwyddbwll am byth !

Posts: 322
Location: Kidwelly
Joined: 03/16/07
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #16 - 04/06/21 at 09:58:28
Post Tools
Hi Eric, do you fancy updating us on how this developed ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #15 - 10/23/10 at 00:37:16
Post Tools
katar wrote on 10/22/10 at 22:05:08:
Finally, don't you think your "style" description sounds like it could pertain to Mickey Adams?  What does Mickey play???  Ruy Lopez, Nimzo, 3E342134275503.... 


I'm only mildly familiar with Mickey's games, so I'm not sure how similar our styles are.  I tried modelling my Black repertoire after Dreev briefly--since we seemed to have similar styles and even have very similar White repertoires--but it didn't work out too well.  He's quite happy in the Anti-Moscow and Meran Semi-Slav's, and I'm not.  The Caro may be a fit.

Also, I'm not sure that us "weekend warriors" are best served by copying the chess elite's openings.  They're playing against other elite players exclusively, and we have to do battle with people rated hundreds of points below us on a regular basis (at least I do now).

Quote:
Since it appears you have little experience in 1.e4 e5 with either color, don't you think playing 1...e5 would do loads of good for your chess education from a pedagogic point of view?  OK I've said enough and i'll step down now.  Where's Markovich?


Yes, where is Markovich?  I suspect you're right, which is why I did some work on 1.e4 e5 a couple of years ago.  As I said, I might be talked into playing it, but I want to play it for the right reasons.  I'm afraid that the many Open positions will not suit me that well (though they may be good for my education).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 438
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #14 - 10/22/10 at 22:05:08
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 10/22/10 at 21:33:24:
It might actually be that 1...e5 is a good choice for me, but I would have a lot of work to do there, am a little put off by all the "romantic" attacking tries White has, and am discouraged about playing into lines that a lot of up-and-coming younger players have played since birth (more or less).

These so-called "romantic" attacking tries are even less threatening than the anti-Sicilians IMO.  What exactly are you afraid of?  King's gambit?  Goring gambit?  Evans gambit?  These are almost never played at a high level for a reason.  Think of them as the "Anti-Spanish" lines akin to the anti-Sicilians.  The Scotch is analogous to the c3-Sicilian in terms of being the most legitimate and most popular sideline.  The Ruy Lopez is your only serious worry, and it suits your description perfectly: a semi-closed, extremely rich strategic middlegame that allows a wide variety of central pawn structures.  Black has rich pawn play in the center and queenside, and Black dictates the play in the mainline RL (White needs to know all these lines and Black need only know one!).   

My opinion is that you greatly overestimate the non-Ruy Lopez tries.  This is to be expected if you have never played those 1.e4 sidelines as White (have you?).  If you've ever tried to build a 1.e4 repertoire, it's just depressing how 1...e5 equalizes in various ways against most of the sidelines.  (Except Ruy Lopez of course!)

Finally, don't you think your "style" description sounds like it could pertain to Mickey Adams?  What does Mickey play???  Ruy Lopez, Nimzo, QID....    Not a bad role model in your situation, i'd say.  Wink

EDIT after your edit:
Since it appears you have little experience in 1.e4 e5 with either color, don't you think playing 1...e5 would do loads of good for your chess education from a pedagogic point of view?  OK I've said enough and i'll step down now.  Where's Markovich?
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #13 - 10/22/10 at 21:33:24
Post Tools
Alright I'd better give some background on what I've played in the past and why I'm rethinking things.  First, I'll point out that I've always been a 1.d4 player, only playing 1.e4 in casual games.  Sometimes I think I should seriously try to play 1.e4, but that's another discussion...

vs. 1.e4
When I started playing chess I played the Sicilian Dragon because of the name, using Chris Ward's first book as a resource.  When I was a 1500 player I saw the book The Complete Dragon (by Gufeld?) and some 1900 player told me that Chris Ward's lines were refuted! 

I got depressed, didn't want to have to buy a huge book, and I took the advice of an older Master who hadn't played competitively for 20 years: I started playing the Taimanov/Paulsen Sicilian.  I also played the French for a while during this time.  I eventually gave up the French because of all the Exchange variations and just played the Taimanov/Paulsen/Kan systems ever since (with occasional Kalashnikovs, Scheveningens, etc).  My results are decent, but have never been great for my rating.  Most of my nice wins come from people playing inferior anti-Sicilian lines, which I score very well against (especially when I get a an improved French sort of position).  I also score well against tame Open Sicilian lines.  Although it doesn't happen often, I get in trouble when White plays like a man and aggressively goes down one of the more dangerous Open Sicilian lines--often Black's delay in development in these systems can be a little difficult to handle.  I can post some games later that make me think the Sicilian might not be best for me if people think that would be helpful.

About a year ago I started playing the Caro-Kann a little as well, and my results have been okay: a draw with a 2300 player, draw with a 2000 player, and 2.5/4 against 1900 players.  The positions weren't exactly thrilling, but I know I've only scratched the surface here.

Only for about 6 months, when I was already about 2000 strength, did I study 1.e4 e5 pretty seriously.  I played only one rated game like this, a Vienna against a young 1700 player, and lost (though the opening wasn't exactly to blame).  It might actually be that 1...e5 is a good choice for me, but I would have a lot of work to do there, am a little put off by all the "romantic" attacking tries White has, and am discouraged about playing into lines that a lot of up-and-coming younger players have played since birth (more or less).

I've been thinking seriously about moving the Sicilian to back-up status and using the Caro or French as my main defense.  I would possibly adopt 1...e5 if strong players convince me that would be best.

vs. 1.d4
My opponents play 1.d4 about 1/4-1/3 as often as 1.e4.  As a 1.d4 player myself, I've had more freedom to switch to various defenses (since I've studies them all from the White side).  I've played a lot of stuff over the years, but I'll stick with my main tries:

For a while I tried playing the Nimzo/Bogo, but gave it up because I hardly ever saw the positions I studied.  Probably half of 1.d4 class players play the Torre, London, or Colle, and I got sick of dealing with those.  Escpecially after being commited to 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6, I always felt that the London and Torre actually did give White a very small advantage.  I have John Cox's Deviations book and it doesn't really change my opinion.  Certainly those lines are not very exciting even if Black is objectively equal.  I had a hard time playing for a win there.  The few times I got to play a Nimzo were generally against White players that specialized in 1 particular line (4.f3, 4.Qc2, etc.), and I always felt I was fighting on White's territory.  Some lines seemed hard to play for a win, too, like 4.Qb3.

I played the Noteboom/Meran for a few years but didn't have that great of results, either.  Often, I would obtain the better position (sometimes with an extra pawn after something like 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.Nf3 dc 5.e4 b5) only to find White's extra space in the center difficult to handle in practice.  Some Noteboom positions can get very messy, also.  I eventually concluded that I play better with a pawn center and less complications, so I moved on.

I played the KID for a short time and had great results against weaker players and terrible results against stronger players.  As long as I could follow the standard plans/pawn breaks as I was fine, but when a stronger player insisted on the position becoming a mess (which can happen a lot on the KID), I didn't do too well.

For a while I played the QGD (mostly Lasker's), and again had decent results.  However, I found it very hard to play for a win against the Exchange QGD and 5.Bf4.  In most of those positions, I felt I'd rather be White.

I started playing the Classical Dutch about 4-5 years ago and have had good results, though they are somewhat skewed because I had a rating advantage in most games.  In general, I play it with 7...Ne4 or 7...a5, treating it kind of like a Queen's Indian and don't go all-out for a Kingside attack.  Also, I think the surprise factor played a big role: I got a lot of easy wins after moves like 1.d4 f5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 e6 4.Nf3 Be7 5.0-0 0-0 6.c4 d6 7.Nc3 Ne4 8.d5? Nxc3! 9.bc e5 or somethjing similar.  An IM crushed me after 1.d4 f5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bg5 d5 4.f3!? and I lost to a 2200 player after 1.d4 f5 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bf4.  I'm still playing the Classical Dutch, but I don't think it's a long-term fit.  White has many dangerous anti-Dutch lines, and once players near my strength actually start studying the main line theory I bet my results will go down. 

I started mixing in some regular Slav games, but in 6 games against 5 different opponents I've had 5 exchanges!  Kind of depressing.  In the Exchange Slav I lost to an IM, lost to a 2250, blundered and lost from a winning position against the same 2250 player, beat a 2200, and drew with another 2200 player.  I also drew with a 1950 player after failing to find a nice tactic in the Euwe variation.  My results weren't terrible mathematically, but the fact that 5/6 of games were in the Exchange Slav really put me off the opening.

I've thought about moving to the Stonewall, Nimzo/QID, or trying the main Slav again.  I've recently wondered about the Chebanenko Slav; Black "surrenders" the center less often there and that might be a good choice for me.

As an aside, I don't personally feel like the Slav and Caro are that closely related--blasphemy, I know.  But whether White has an e-pawn or c-pawn makes a difference to me (though I'm not sure which one I prefer). 

Is anyone still reading this?  If so, thank you!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


There is a crack in everything.

Posts: 3183
Joined: 11/07/06
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #12 - 10/22/10 at 10:12:47
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 10/21/10 at 21:56:03:
The more I think about this, the more I think I prefer semi-closed or semi-blocked positions.  In general I like getting my pieces to ideal squares and then making a decisive central advance/breakthough (obviously this only happens in a fraction of games, but I'm talking stylistic preferences).  I don't mind positions that are quite blocked as long as I still have pawn breaks to create winning chances.  When the game opens up, I want to have the initiative already, not open it with the intention of engaging in an equal struggle for it like Bronstein or Tal.

I'm also very good at clarifying the center in a way that favors me.  In those positions where both sides have multiple captures or advances they could make (lots of KID positions, the old Rubinstein Nimzo where Black plays both ...d5 and ...c5, the Closed Catalan, etc.) I'm good at sensing the right moment to release the tension and generally understand what pawn formations will favor what piece placements, etc.


So you are good at selecting the right pawn breaks to complement your pieces, and time them well. This suggests that you should play defences where there are many pawn breaks available (even for both sides - since this is a strength of yours compared to your opponents) and more generally many different possible pawn structures. Meaning you should start with fluid pawn centres. One obvious example: Instead of a blocked d6/e5 Sicilian you play a fluid/early non-contact e6/d6 one, where ...e6-e5 may follow later and only if it's good, but White must also look out for ...d5 or, more rarely, ...f5.

The defences I've used most successfully to utilize my skills with fluid pawn centres, are the Pirc/Modern against 1.e4 and the Leningrad Dutch against 1.d4. But you're asking for sound main lines, and I won't bet that either of them are.

A more serious repertoire with fluid pawn centres could involve:

Against 1.e4: ...e6-based Sicilians
(Scheveningen, Najdorf-Scheveningen, Kan, Taimanov, Classical, Grivas)


There are several, and they're thematically similar enough that it's possible to have more than one available. I'm now working on the Kan which is great for creating winning chances against (positionally) weaker players. I intend to add the super-solid Scheveningen at some point; though unsure whether a 2...e6 or Najdorf move order is best to reach it, and whether or not I should allow the Keres attack. Perhaps the least theoretical one (though growing rapidly) is the Grivas Sicilian 2...Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Qb6, as popularized by Grivas in a book and Chessbase articles.

Against 1.d4: The Nimzo-Indian + ??

In the Nimzo Black has several viable choices against each of White's main lines, and the centre doesn't have to get determined early, that's Nimzowitsch's whole point. The big question is which "partner" defence to choose. Both the Bogo-Indian and the Queen's Indian offer positions with fluid pawn centres and a variety of possible pawn structures. The Modern Benoni has a more blocked, semi-open centre, but still both White and black can play with pawns on either the kingside or the queenside, plus of course White can play in the centre. Of these three the Queen's Indian has the best theoretical status.

Alternatively, the King's Indian

...and choose as much as possible lines without an early ...e5. The main problem here stylistically would be the blocked "race" positions in the Classical main line, so there i would recommend looking into either 6/7...Na6 or 6/7...Nbd7. Though I'm not sure if either is theoretically good at the moment.

Edit: Furher points that occured to me when looking at your description of your style:

- Neither the e6 Sicilians nor the Nimzo-Indian normally lead to wild, tactical positions unless Black wants them to

- Both have been played by some of the strongest defenders ever, like (for e6 Sicilians) Botvinnik, Taimanov, Andersson, Adorjan, Anand; (for Nimzo/QID) Nimzowitsch, Karpov, Leko, Adams. Btw. early in his carreer, Karpov played the Kan when he needed to win against weaker opponents.

- The e6 Sicilians can eventually lead to a black space advantage in the centre, after White's initiative peters out.
« Last Edit: 10/22/10 at 11:25:43 by Stigma »  

Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #11 - 10/22/10 at 03:19:11
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 10/21/10 at 21:56:03:
It's very hard to define messy positions, but in the Anti-Moscow Black has made weakening pawn advances on both his Q-side and K-side, and his King doesn't have an obvious place to hide.  All for an extra pawn.  I realize this is a viable way to play for a win as Black (and other "positional" players like Dreev do so), but I would prefer White here.  He has a nice, mobile pawn center, his King knows where it's going, and he can work on getting at Black's weakened squares.  I personally wouldn't want to suffer White's initiative with a King in the center and potential weak squares on both flanks for the sake of a pawn.  It's just messy enough for me to screw something up after playing well for 20 moves.


Understood. Given this information it further solidifies the Slav (Chebanenko, or Sokolov), and NID/QID/QGD complexes.

The Dutch Stonewall is actually a real possibility versus 1. d4 given you get space at the cost of a mostly manageable weakness, understanding trumps theory, excellent defenders throughout history have made use of it (Botvinnik, Petrosian, Kramnik), and you can maneuver. Black also retains pawn breaks on the kingside (...g5) and queenside (...c5) depending on what happens.

Based on your description I would rule out the Classical Dutch, and Leningrad, though.

Semi-Slav would get bumped further down the list.

Quote:
The more I think about this, the more I think I prefer semi-closed or semi-blocked positions.  In general I like getting my pieces to ideal squares and then making a decisive central advance/breakthough (obviously this only happens in a fraction of games, but I'm talking stylistic preferences).  I don't mind positions that are quite blocked as long as I still have pawn breaks to create winning chances.  When the game opens up, I want to have the initiative already, not open it with the intention of engaging in an equal struggle for it like Bronstein or Tal.


Understood. That solidifies my mental picture of Slav, NID/QID/QGD, Stonewall Dutch recommendations. All of them fit that description in that pawn breaks are common.

Quote:
I'm also very good at clarifying the center in a way that favors me.  In those positions where both sides have multiple captures or advances they could make (lots of KID positions, the old Rubinstein Nimzo where Black plays both ...d5 and ...c5, the Closed Catalan, etc.) I'm good at sensing the right moment to release the tension and generally understand what pawn formations will favor what piece placements, etc.


Definitely have to simplify my recommendations from my previous post.

Versus 1. e4 - 1...e5, C-K, French.

Versus 1. d4 - Slav, NID/QID/QGD, Stonewall Dutch.

If one were to choose the Stonewall then it would go best with the French in order to use 1. d4 e6 and avoid various Dutch sidelines.

Following in Karpov's footsteps would be combining the C-K with the NID/QID/QGD complex for a highly positional repertoire with plenty of scope for outplaying opponents in addition to not creating any weaknesses. Not surprisingly there's even a transposition from the Caro-Kann to the Nimzo-Indian (1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. c4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. Nf3 Bb4 7. Bd3 dxc4 8. Bxc4 0-0 9. 0-0 b6).

Quote:
It was a low point for me as well--we should get back in touch through PMs, I'd like to know what you're doing these days, etc.


I had a feeling based on some of the conversations we had at the time.

I'm going to send you a PM, so be on the look out for it.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #10 - 10/21/10 at 22:12:36
Post Tools
Thanks everyone for the responses so far, I mean it, and I'm thinking about what you've all said.  In a day or two I'll post my previous repertoires, what I liked and didn't like about them, etc.  Hopefully a few more players will chime in.

@MNb and Stigma:
I completely agree about the false dichotomy portrayed by chess authors about chess styles.  That's why I used quotation marks, and why I said that I realize these are generalizations.  For instance, Kramnik was an incredible attacking, tactical player earlier in his career (I think he said in an interview that he wasn't sure what happened to make him change styles, that it wasn't a conscious choice, etc).  I actually do feel a strong affinity for a lot of Karpov's earlier games, but there are times when he plays moves that would never have entered my head (likewise with Petrosian).  I feel a stronger affinity with Smyslov and Botvinnik than Tal or Bronstein, for instance, but I'm not sure how much you can read into that.

I don't try to play prophylactically, but I'm a big believer in "prophylactic thinking."  Though I don't always play prophylactic (like those Nimzovitchian Rook-to closed file) moves, I constantly try to understand what my opponent is trying to do and whether I should make things difficult for him or go on with my own plans.

I also think I calculate a lot, maybe a little too much, but I'm not really sure how much other people calculate.  In post mortems, I find that I've often seen more than my opponent, even when I lose (adjusted for rating, of course).  I have a strong intuitive positional sense and calculate a lot to overcome a weak intuitive tactical sense.  I guess...it's really hard to understand your own thought process.

As a humorous aside, there was a chapter in a Dvoretsky's Positional Play, written by Bareev, where Bareev is analyzing a game he played against Karpov.  Bareev gets into a position where he doesn't really know how he should proceed, when Karpov makes a move that Bareev doesn't understand at all!  So he tries to figure out what Karpov is taking prophylactic measures against, and in so doing figures out what his own plan should be.  Pretty funny (and maybe a little tongue-in-cheek)!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2514
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #9 - 10/21/10 at 21:56:03
Post Tools
BPaulsen wrote on 10/21/10 at 04:34:07:
Identifying what is/isn't a messy position to you. The Botvinnik Semi-Slav/Winawer Poison Pawn are complete chaos, but the question is how chaotic are certain positions like the Anti-Moscow?


It's very hard to define messy positions, but in the Anti-Moscow Black has made weakening pawn advances on both his Q-side and K-side, and his King doesn't have an obvious place to hide.  All for an extra pawn.  I realize this is a viable way to play for a win as Black (and other "positional" players like Dreev do so), but I would prefer White here.  He has a nice, mobile pawn center, his King knows where it's going, and he can work on getting at Black's weakened squares.  I personally wouldn't want to suffer White's initiative with a King in the center and potential weak squares on both flanks for the sake of a pawn.  It's just messy enough for me to screw something up after playing well for 20 moves.

Quote:
Clarifying what you meant about the center earlier - ie: are blocked centers okay, or do you prefer an open file?


The more I think about this, the more I think I prefer semi-closed or semi-blocked positions.  In general I like getting my pieces to ideal squares and then making a decisive central advance/breakthough (obviously this only happens in a fraction of games, but I'm talking stylistic preferences).  I don't mind positions that are quite blocked as long as I still have pawn breaks to create winning chances.  When the game opens up, I want to have the initiative already, not open it with the intention of engaging in an equal struggle for it like Bronstein or Tal.

I'm also very good at clarifying the center in a way that favors me.  In those positions where both sides have multiple captures or advances they could make (lots of KID positions, the old Rubinstein Nimzo where Black plays both ...d5 and ...c5, the Closed Catalan, etc.) I'm good at sensing the right moment to release the tension and generally understand what pawn formations will favor what piece placements, etc.

Quote:
I'd like to think we've both come a long way not ust as chessplayers, but in life. That was a real low point for me aside from the chess, it didn't seem much better for you either.


It was a low point for me as well--we should get back in touch through PMs, I'd like to know what you're doing these days, etc.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


There is a crack in everything.

Posts: 3183
Joined: 11/07/06
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #8 - 10/21/10 at 20:30:28
Post Tools
A tangent on players' styles (linked to repertoire choices here):

I realized only when I started studying GM games on my own how hugely exaggerated the claims for different styles among top players are. I understand chess writers do this to invoke drama and "intellectual" conflict, but it's just not fair to those honestly trying to improve their own play to suggest that you can be only an attacker, or only a defensive, prophylactic player, or only an endgame expert, and succeed. Yet this is the take-home message many amateurs get from instructional writers and general game collections.

Alekhine was a great prophylactic player and Karpov a gifted attacker. Sometimes I find it hard to tell their games apart stylistically (apart from 50 years' worth of opening theory of course). Smyslov (a not-so-prophylactic  positional player?!) played some of the greatest prophylactic masterpieces ever, against Reshevsky (Moscow 1948) and Denker, for example.

With this need many people have to put top players neatly into boxes, you get amateur self-declared attackers criticizing great all-around players (as all world-class GMs are) like Leko and Petrosian for not being aggressive enough, when in reality both those great players could totally annihilate said amateurs from any reasonable attacking position. It's sickening, really.

Just had to get that off my chest. Now go back to your repertoire suggestions!  Smiley
« Last Edit: 10/22/10 at 09:39:26 by Stigma »  

Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 438
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Recommend Black repertoire for my style
Reply #7 - 10/21/10 at 16:48:55
Post Tools
Against 1.e4:
I would suggest 1...e5 since your biggest priority is to secure space in the center.  Specifically, I would point you to Mihail Marin's 2 repertoire books on 1...e5.  He avoids sharp "theory contests" out of the opening-- for example by preferring the Giuoco over the Two Knights and opting for the KG Declined.  Marin's Ruy Lopez defense is the Closed Chigorin line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 c5 11.d4 Qc7 12.Nbd2 and now either 12...Nc6 (the Rubinstein Variation) or 12...Bd7 (the Petrosian System).  As an alternative, you might also investigate 11...Nfd7 (the Keres variation), where one idea is pawn play with the f-pawn (which should appeal to your preference for pawn play in the center).  Nigel Davies covers the Nfd7 line in his "Play 1...e5" and i believe Shereshevsky suggested this same variation in the Soviet Chess COnveyor.

Against 1.d4:
This is a harder question.  1...d5 claims space but the pawn structures tend to resolve quickly into something set in stone rather than fluid in the middlegame (e.g., Carlsbad, IQP, etc)-- in other words, my impression is that neither side is particularly flexible with their pawn play, but the middlegame instead revolves around well-known positional themes (eg, minority attack).  Therefore I'd suggest Nimzo-Indian and Bogo-Indian due to their greater flexibility with the central pawns.  There is nothing wrong with QID of course, but my impression (as one who doesnt play any of these openings for either color) is that Bogo secures Black more central space with pawns than the QID.  Black is not getting overrun by white's center pawns, White can't force tactical chaos without Black's permission, and Black has huge flexibility with his own fluid pawn center.  Don't laugh, but as a starting point i'd even mention the Dzindzi/Alburt/Perelshteyn book. 
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo