It's fine for me Tony to accept your proposal of maintain some repertoires.
After 20 years of open with 1.e4 and avoid mainstream theory, I have changed to the 1.d4, c4, Nf3 complex.
As black I have been playing Sicilian Sveshnikov in correspondence chess since 1990, so I have some "unpublished ideas" in some lines out of fashion now.
And the same happens with Grunfelds, my first love when I was a young player.
In the meanwhile, I have played french, closed spanish, and Slav-SemiSlav complex, but as a second weapon, if some is broken in my pet lines. Playing that lines in an active way.
My chess-style fits with active play playing unbalanced positions as black, and clearly long-term small advantages as white.
My ending skills are good enough to be able to win microscopic advantages as white (ala Karpov) in correspondence chess. And to win in a tactical way, if my opponent miss something in his analysis.
Could you clarify by a private message time-table of the repertoires, task, and soon?
GMTonyKosten wrote on 11/28/10 at 12:24:55:
I think that one strong player should be in charge of each repertoire, that they should say what lines they intend to cover, and that anyone can suggest changes/improvements as time goes by.
If TN and Fausto are happy to take on a repertoire each that is great.