MNb wrote on 02/03/11 at 15:59:31:
Perhaps you should leave the Queen's Knight on b8 and prefer 3...c5 4.c3 Qb6 5.Nf3 Bd7 idea Bb5. I am not aware of pyrotechnics in this line. Having a preference for some mad hacking myself this is an important reason not to play 3.e5.
If you are going to stick to 3...c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Qb6 then 6.a3 c4 is the most solid. But you won't reach your ideal position of course.
Against 3...c5 4.c3 Qb6 5.Nf3 Bd7, doesn't White have chances for an edge with 6.Bd3 cxd4 7.Nxd4! or 6...Bb5 7.dxc5 Bxc5 8.b4! ? Those lines aren't necessarily devoid of tactics.
I agree 5...Qb6 6.a3 c4 is pretty solid. I'll probably choose between that and 6.a3 Bd7 (which Vitiugov analyses in his recent French book) - if the latter line is playable it can be reached by either 5...Bd7 6.a3 or 5...Qb6 6.a3.
MNb wrote on 02/03/11 at 15:59:31:
In your line b) 7.dxc5 might cause some nuisance.
So if you really want that much to reach your ideal position you might take a look at 5...Bd7 6.a3 cxd4 7.cxd4 Nge7.
Shouldn't White get some advantage by playing Nc3 then? Anyway I don't think 6.Be2 Nge7 7.dxc5 Ng6 is a big problem. A move later, 7.0-0 Nf5 8.dxc5 Nh4 was a recent game Conquest - Williams.
MNb wrote on 02/03/11 at 15:59:31:
Your question is a bit irregular. Usually after 3.e5 the question is: how can Black achieve equality and create winning chances, including by diving into a mess?
As far as I know there quite a few solid lines for Black that might give White an edge, but nothing alarming. The ones mentioned by you belong to these.
Sure it's irregular
I normally play unbalanced, aggressive lines like 5...Qb6 6.Be2 Nh6 and Uhlmann's 5...Qb6 6.a3 c4 7.Nbd2 f6?!?. Actually my entire Black repertoire is like that, and now I've realized it would be good make room for some solid lines too. It's exhausting and nerve-wracking to always play for complications!